1 / 22

Measuring γ at LHCb with Dalitz Methods and Global Sensitivity

This study explores the measurement of γ (angle) using the Dalitz method in B-→D0(KSππ)K- decays at LHCb. The yield, background expectations, amplitude model fits, and model-independent fits are analyzed. Other opportunities for Dalitz analysis and the global sensitivity to γ with tree-level processes at LHCb are also discussed.

ahoran
Download Presentation

Measuring γ at LHCb with Dalitz Methods and Global Sensitivity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Measuring γ at LHCb with Dalitz Methods and Global Sensitivity • Measuring  with B-→D0(KS)K- • Yield and background expectations • Amplitude model fits • Model independent fits • Other Dalitz Opportunities • Global Sensitivity to  with • Tree-Level Processes at LHCb Guy Wilkinson (University of Oxford) On behalf of the LHCb collaboration LHCb Gamma Dalitz and Global Fit Guy Wilkinson - CKM 2008 - Rome

  2. Dalitz fits to extract γ LHCb Gamma Dalitz and Global Fit Guy Wilkinson - CKM 2008 - Rome

  3. Can measure  through the interference in B-→(D0/D0)K- decays… B±→(D→K0S+-)K± B+ B- BELLE: arXiv:0803.3375 …provided D0 and D0 decay into a common final state. B-factories have pioneered Dalitz analysis of KS. Measuring γ in B-→D0(KSππ)K- How well will this method work at LHCb? LHCb Gamma Dalitz and Global Fit Guy Wilkinson - CKM 2008 - Rome

  4. Hadronic state such as B-→D0(KS)K- is well suited to capabilities of LHCb At earliest (‘L0’) trigger level hadron high-pT trigger most important discriminator Offline, signal separated from background through usual cuts, eg. : pT requirements; impact parameter significance w.r.t. primary-vertex; vertex chi2; RICH PID requirements; consistency of reconstructed B flight direction and direction of primary-vertex→B-vertex; mass cuts… Only specific challenge w.r.t. other hadronic decays comes from KS Reconstruction. After all offline cuts ‘DD’ make up ~2/3 of sample. T-stations ‘LL’ TT VELO ‘DD’ Ongoing work focused at finding ‘DD’ tracks with necessary speed in HLT. Here assume HLT selection is fully efficient. Unusable Magnet B-→D0(KS)K-Selection [LHCb-48-2007] LHCb Gamma Dalitz and Global Fit Guy Wilkinson - CKM 2008 - Rome

  5. Background studied with inclusive bb events, & with specific B-→D0- sample • Combinatorics from bb Event Yields and Background Mature analysis - numbers assumed for sensitivity studies Indications from most recent simulation study This number looks rather stable Expected yield in 2 fb-1: 5000 events Study with similar samples and with large bb MC sample enriched in ‘dangerous’ events. No indication to revise significantly this estimate ; also have learnt dangerous ‘DK’ component (see later) is not dominant B/S < 0.7 at 90% CL B-→D0- background suppressed to < 10% through introducing max. momentum cut (good for RICH) • Contamination from B-→D0- B/S ≈ 0.25 LHCb Gamma Dalitz and Global Fit Guy Wilkinson - CKM 2008 - Rome

  6. signal DK combinatoric D Phase-space combinatoric Acceptance and background classification Dalitz acceptance rather flat and can be measured in data from B-→D0- events. Here model with polynomial for subsequent amplitude fit. Make-up of background found in bb events largely unknown. 2 main possibilities: • True D with random/fake K • (‘DK combinatorial’) • Fake D • (‘Phase-space combinatorial’) Consider 3 scenarios with a 0.7 B/S coming from: 1) all ‘DK combinatoric’; 2) half DK combinatoric, half phase-space ;3) all phase-space LHCb Gamma Dalitz and Global Fit Guy Wilkinson - CKM 2008 - Rome

  7. B- B+ Extracting γ LHCb simulated sample for 2 fb-1 (with no background), CPV included: The KS Dalitz plots contain a CP-violating contribution from the B+ and B- interference which is sensitive to . Consider two analysis methods: • Unbinned fit based on amplitude model; • Model independent binned fit using results from ψ(3770) on D decays LHCb Gamma Dalitz and Global Fit Guy Wilkinson - CKM 2008 - Rome

  8. Sensitivities for 2 fb-1 (ie. 5000 events) Input values: Fit Scenario  r δ B B No background; flat acceptance 5.8o 0.010 6.0o  = 60o; δB=130o; rB=0.10 D (B/S=0.24) + phase-space (B/S=0.7); real acceptance 9.1o 0.017 9.0o Fits work well, with any bias small compared with statistical uncertainty D + phase-space (B/S=0.35) + DK (B/S=0.35); real acceptance 9.8o 0.018 9.3o D + DK (B/S=0.7); realistic acceptance 10.7o 0.017 9.1o Results scale with sample sizes & rB in expected manner Amplitude Model Fit [LHCb-48-2007] LHCb has followed example of B-factories and investigated potential of amplitude fit to extract  from analysis of KS Dalitz plots from B+ and B- Generate, and then fit, events assuming isobar model. Have considered both BaBar [PRL 95 (2005) 121802] and Belle [hep-ex/0411049] models. (Sensitivity results consistent, so here only report those from latter.) So statistical error on of 9-11o. Total error will also include a model uncertainty – latest BaBar analysis [PRD 78 (2008) 034023]estimates this at 7o. LHCb Gamma Dalitz and Global Fit Guy Wilkinson - CKM 2008 - Rome

  9. ci,si : average in bin of cosine, sine of strong phase between D0 and D0 Binned Model-Independent Fit Binned fit proposed by Giri et al.[PRD 68 (2003) 054018] and developed by Bondar & Poluektov [arXiv:0801.0840; hep-ph/0703267; EPJ C47 (2006) 347] removes model dependence by relating events in bin i of Dalitz plot to experimental observables. x± = rBcos(δB± ) Number of events for flavour-tagged D sample B± events in bin i of Dalitz plot y± = rB sin(δB± ) Can be measured directly in quantum correlated decays at ψ(3770)! Expect final CLEO-c results soon… Choosing bins of similar strong phase difference maximises statistical precision No model error! Instead: i) slight degradation in statistical precision; ii) residual error on  from finite CLEO-c statistics: • B & P [arXiv:0801.0840] estimate 5o (usedin our global fit) • Latest CLEO-c estimate is 1-2o[Asner, ICHEP 08] LHCb Gamma Dalitz and Global Fit Guy Wilkinson - CKM 2008 - Rome

  10. r Fit Scenario  δ B B 8.0o No background; flat acceptance 0.013 7.9o 12.9o D (B/S=0.24) + phase-space (B/S=0.7); real acceptance 12.8o 0.020 12.8o D + phase-space (B/S=0.35) + DK (B/S=0.35); real acceptance 0.020 12.6o 12.7o D + DK (B/S=0.7); realistic acceptance 0.020 12.7o Binned Fit: LHCb study [LHCb-2007-141] Study performed using BaBar isobar model [PRL 95 (2005) 121802], both for generation and to define 8 equally separated bins in strong phase difference. Include acceptance variation & background. One toy experiment Fit parameters x± & y± , then transform to physics parameters Sensitivities for 2 fb-1 (ie. 5000 events) Compare with amplitude fit: • D+DK bckgd scenario 20% worse • Results more robust against bckgd LHCb Gamma Dalitz and Global Fit Guy Wilkinson - CKM 2008 - Rome

  11. Sensitivity to γ with ∫Ldt Calculate how total error evolves with time for amplitude fit & binned approach. Amplitude fit, model error 7o Binned fit, CLEO-c error 2o Error at end of baseline LHCb (10 fb-1): 8.5o (amplitude model); 6.0o (binned). These numbers neglect experimental systematics. For unbinned fit, resolution and acceptance effects have been considered and are expected to be small. LHCb Gamma Dalitz and Global Fit Guy Wilkinson - CKM 2008 - Rome

  12. Amplitude fit, model error 7o Binned fit, CLEO-c error 2o Binned fit, CLEO-c error 5o Sensitivity to γ with ∫Ldt In global fit studies (see later) a binned analysis is assumed with 5o CLEO error This is historical, and – if we believe ‘Asner ICHEP 08’ – conservative. This assumption gives a 10 fb-1 error on  of 7.6o (new CLEO-c value → 6.0o). LHCb Gamma Dalitz and Global Fit Guy Wilkinson - CKM 2008 - Rome

  13. Other Opportunities in Dalitz Studies B-→D0(KS)K- approach can be extended to other multi-body modes. LHCb KK study [LHCb-2007-098] Some possibilities: • D0→KSKK (already exploited • at BaBar [PRD 78 (2008) 034023]) • or D0→KSK • D0→KK: proposed in • PLB 647 (2007) 400 and explored in • LHCb in LHCb-2007-098. Same • principle, but Dalitz space now • requires 5-variables. Amplitude model now exists, [FOCUS, PRD B610 (2005) 225] but requires further development. LHCb error on  : 18o in 2 fb-1 • Perhaps Dalitz fits of suppressed • ADS modes for K or K0 ? LHCb Gamma Dalitz and Global Fit Guy Wilkinson - CKM 2008 - Rome

  14. Combined Fit to γ LHCb Gamma Dalitz and Global Fit Guy Wilkinson - CKM 2008 - Rome

  15. B-→D0K-: • D0→K, KK,  • D0→K • D0→KS (LHCb-2008-011) (LHCb-2007-004) (LHCb-2007-048) B0→D0K*0 • D0→K, KK,  (LHCb-2007-050) Time dependent measurements: • B0→D • Bs→DsK (LHCb-2007-044) (LHCb-2007-041) LHCb Global Sensitivity to  With B→DK methods perform global fit of common parameters. In addition consider results from B0 and Bs time dependent analyses. (LHCb-2008-031) Input measurements considered: Summary of event yields in 2 fb-1 LHCb Gamma Dalitz and Global Fit Guy Wilkinson - CKM 2008 - Rome

  16. rB - ratio of magnitude of diagrams (0.1) o + 22 δK = (-158 ) - 16 δB - strong phase difference (130o) D B0→DK0* analogues: rB (0.40), δB (scan) o o δDK3π [o] δK (-158o), δK3(144o)- strong phase differences (r K , r K3 well known) D D D D RK3π B→DK free parameters and constraints Free parameters (and values used toy MC studies) Constraints (from CLEO-c) • PRL 100 (2008) 221801: Parameters common to B-→DK- : (ADS formalism requires -180o phase shift w.r.t. published result) • Preliminary: arXiv:0805.1722 D decay parameters for K, K: RK3 - coherence factor And of course  (60o) LHCb Gamma Dalitz and Global Fit Guy Wilkinson - CKM 2008 - Rome

  17. K rB rB o δD (deg) RK3 δB (deg) O δB (deg) K3 (deg) Gaussian fit →  = 5.7o δD(deg) Fitted B→DK parameters for many 2fb-1 experiments In general Gaussian – tails less pronounced than in fits to individual modes. LHCb Gamma Dalitz and Global Fit Guy Wilkinson - CKM 2008 - Rome

  18. Add results from time dependent CP-measurements (see Carbone talk): Bs→DsK very powerful [LHCb-2007-041] : Bs→Ds-K+ Bs→Ds-K+ 2 fb-1 error on : 10.3o As explained in Carbone talk, B0→D is very promising, but in conventional analysis requires complementary measurement, eg. B0→D*, or alternatively U-spin combination with Bs→DsK to yield competitive results [LHCb-2008-035] . Here take B0→ D uncertainty of 20o in 2 fb-1 (rather conservative) Include Time Dependent CP Measurements LHCb Gamma Dalitz and Global Fit Guy Wilkinson - CKM 2008 - Rome

  19. Sensitivity to  including all measurement Results shown as function of δBo, least well known parameter. Sensitivity of B0→D0K*0 improves by factor of two in going from δBo = 45→180o . Residual dependence remains in global fit, but diluted due to other measurements. Weight (in %) of each contributing analysis with 2 fb-1 for two values of δBo: LHCb Gamma Dalitz and Global Fit Guy Wilkinson - CKM 2008 - Rome

  20. Conclusions • Measurement of  with B-→D0(KS)K- as pioneered by B-factories • appears a very promising strategy at LHCb. Model independent approach • gives uncertainty of 6o over lifetime of baseline experiment. • Dalitz strategy can be extended to other modes, eg: KSKK, KK • Combined fit of all tree-level  measurements helps obtain Gaussian • fit results for parameters, and yields best-possible overall precision. →  uncertainty around 2o with 10 fb-1 • Although real data may inevitably hold nasty surprises, and final stage of • HLT is still under development, there are also promising other modes not • yet included in average/study: → D→K0, KSKK, KK …, B→D(*)K(*) + other time dependent measurements, eg. B0→D*, Bs →Ds(*)K1 + improved Information from other experiments (eg. ci, si precision from CLEO-c) The work will begin very soon – first experience in reconstructing real hadronic final states in the next couple of months ! LHCb Gamma Dalitz and Global Fit Guy Wilkinson - CKM 2008 - Rome

  21. Backup LHCb Gamma Dalitz and Global Fit Guy Wilkinson - CKM 2008 - Rome

  22. 2 fb-1 of data: D0(K,KK,)K + D0(K)K + CLEO-c constraints; scan in δK D o External constraints important: equivalent to doubling of B dataset at δK= -158 D ADS/GLW B± measurements alone:the role of the external constraints (And external input essential for D0→KS to avoid model dependent systematic) LHCb Gamma Dalitz and Global Fit Guy Wilkinson - CKM 2008 - Rome

More Related