1 / 10

SEEF: Svensk och finsk kärnkraft mm

SEEF: Svensk och finsk kärnkraft mm. Göran Lundgren, Vattenfall Elproduktion Norden 2007-12-12. Denmark -5,6 TWh Wind 2,7 Decommissioning of coal condensing units -11,9 CHP, condensing 3,6. Changes in Base Power 2007 – 2015 (LPP 2007). Finland 11,4 TWh Wind 0,3

ahmed-cain
Download Presentation

SEEF: Svensk och finsk kärnkraft mm

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SEEF: Svensk och finsk kärnkraft mm Göran Lundgren, Vattenfall Elproduktion Norden 2007-12-12

  2. Denmark -5,6 TWh Wind 2,7 Decommissioning ofcoal condensing units -11,9 CHP, condensing 3,6 Changes in Base Power 2007 – 2015 (LPP 2007) • Finland11,4 TWh • Wind 0,3 • Hydro 0,3 • CHP* 3,7 • Nuclear 12,0 • Decommissioning of • coal condensing units -4,9 Sweden23,3 TWh Wind 5,5 Hydro 1,7 Nuclear power upgrading 9,0 Natural gas CHP* 2,0 Biofuel CHP* 5,1 Decommissioning of nuclear units 0 • Norway18,0 TWh • Wind 3,5 • Natural gas 8,7 • Hydro 5,8 47,1 TWh Increased electricity use 19,7 TWh * CHP and back-pressure generation

  3. Denmark 0,7 TWh Wind 3,0 CHP* 7,0 Decommissioning ofcoal condensing units -9,3 Changes in Base Power 2016 – 2030 (LPP 2007) • Finland9,5 TWh • Wind 1,0 • Hydro 1,1 • CHP* 5,5 • Nuclear (12,5-4,2) 8,3 • Decommissioning of • coal condensing units -6,4 Sweden-15,2 TWh Wind 3,0 Hydro 1,5 Nuclear power upgrading 0 Natural gas CHP* 0,2 Biofuel CHP* 2,5 Decommissioning of nuclear units -22,4 • Norway8,8 TWh • Wind 3,0 • Natural gas 2,8 • Hydro 3,0 3,8 TWh Increased electricity use 10,9 TWh * CHP and back-pressure generation

  4. Denmark 0,7 TWh Wind 3,0 CHP* 7,0 Decommissioning ofcoal condensing units -9,3 Changes in Base Power 2016 – 2030 (nuclear 60 years) (LPP 2007) • Finland13,7 TWh • Wind 1,0 • Hydro 1,1 • CHP* 5,5 • Nuclear 12,5 • Decommissioning of • coal condensing units -6,4 Sweden7,2 TWh Wind 3,0 Hydro 1,5 Nuclear power upgrading 0 Natural gas CHP* 0,2 Biofuel CHP* 2,5 Decommissioning of nuclear units 0 • Norway8,8 TWh • Wind 3,0 • Natural gas 2,8 • Hydro 3,0 30,4 TWh Increased electricity use 10,9 TWh * CHP and back-pressure generation

  5. Generation capacity and consumption in the Nordic countries (LPP 2007) The generation capacity does not include the contracted import from Russia and Estonia, about 11-15 TWh/year, and export to other countries.

  6. EME Analys: ”Varför är svenskar så mycket sämre än finnar på att köra kärnkraft verk?”

  7. ”Produktionsutnyttjande 94% vs 81%” • Marknad, produktionsmiljö • Teknik • Perkele

  8. Findings of a broad selection of studies evaluating the competition of the Nordic electricity market

  9. Vi drar absolut inte ner produktion för att hålla priset uppe eller manipulera marknaden !

More Related