1 / 10

James Ritchie Senior Policy and Publicity Manager European Social Fund Division

Network for Europe European Funding - Good Practice and Preparing for the Next Programme event Tuesday 3 July 2012 EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUND. James Ritchie Senior Policy and Publicity Manager European Social Fund Division. ESF in England 2007-2013. £2.5 billion focused mainly on two priorities:

ahendon
Download Presentation

James Ritchie Senior Policy and Publicity Manager European Social Fund Division

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Network for EuropeEuropean Funding - Good Practice and Preparing for the Next Programme eventTuesday 3 July 2012EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUND James Ritchie Senior Policy and Publicity Manager European Social Fund Division

  2. ESF in England 2007-2013 £2.5 billion focused mainly on two priorities: extending employment opportunities employability & skills for disadvantaged people families with multiple problems community grants developing a skilled & adaptable workforce training low skilled workers, especially in SMEs

  3. Civil Society participation National level • strong focus on delivering localised, specialised, voluntary services • 2007-2010 phase – 211 voluntary sector organisation sub-contractors in DWP ESF CFO provision (60% of sub-contractors) • 2011 ESF Community Grant delivery • over 800 grants awarded • average value – c. £10,000 • participants supported – c. 22,000 • networks to raise awareness, involvement and achievements

  4. ESF 2014-2020 thematic objectives • European Commission proposes enhanced focus on Europe 2020 growth strategy: • promoting employment & labour mobility • investing in education, skills & lifelong learning • promoting social inclusion & combating poverty • enhancing institutional capacity & efficient public administration

  5. European Commission investment priorities 18 investment priorities including: Access to employment for job-seekers and inactive people, including local employment initiatives and support for labour mobility; Sustainable integration of young people NEET into the labour market; Adaptation of workers, enterprises and entrepreneurs to change; Active and healthy ageing; Improving the quality, efficiency, and openness of tertiary and equivalent education with a view to increasing participation and attainment levels; Enhancing access to lifelong learning, upgrading the skills and competences of the workforce, and increasing the labour market relevance of education and training systems; Combating discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation; Active inclusion; Promoting the social economy and social enterprises.

  6. European Commission delivery options Options in regulations to encourage local engagement: Integrated Territorial Investments Community Led Local Development Role of cities New financial instruments to encourage social investment

  7. ESF 2014-2020: initial policy thinking Focus on disadvantaged groups, particularly those not eligible for, or not well served by existing mainstream provision. Opportunities to support recently published Social Justice strategy. Groups likely to include: young people not in employment, education or training; troubled families; ex-offenders; unskilled people. Also scope to support growth agenda through funding self-employment and entrepreneurship, and upskilling employees, particularly in SMEs.

  8. ESF 2014-2020: delivery issues Existing arrangements are effective: coherence with national policy priorities – ensures that ESF complements and does not duplicate or support local alternatives to the Work Programme or skills strategy; match funding comes from national programmes; delivery is efficient (low national overheads); sound financial management through standardised national procurement and control systems. But are they responsive enough to local needs, particularly given Government’s localism agenda and focus on cities ?

  9. ESF 2014-2020: challenges How can we get more local input into strategic planning of how the funds are spent ? What advantages could closer alignment of funds (especially ESF and ERDF) bring ? Are there arguments for different local delivery models ? Which sub-national organisations have the capacity and capability to make a difference and take on financial risks ? If some national elements remain, can we put in place effective mechanisms for local engagement ?

  10. ESF 2014-2020: possible options Separate Operational Programmes for (a) Helping disadvantaged groups; and (b) Supporting Growth, with the second aligned with ERDF (and therefore “regionalised”). Different arrangements for engaging Voluntary and Community Sector, particularly in delivering social inclusion activities ? Some core cities having greater local control. Is London a model to copy ? Improved procurement arrangements through CFOs, with greater local consultation.

More Related