Smart buildings for a smart grid technology services to make buildings grid responsive
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 13

Smart Buildings for a Smart Grid Technology & Services to Make Buildings Grid Responsive PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 89 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

National Town Meeting on Demand Response and Smart Grid – Washington, DC. Smart Buildings for a Smart Grid Technology & Services to Make Buildings Grid Responsive. James Dagley, Vice President of Channel Marketing and Strategy June 24, 2010. Intro to Johnson Controls.

Download Presentation

Smart Buildings for a Smart Grid Technology & Services to Make Buildings Grid Responsive

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Smart buildings for a smart grid technology services to make buildings grid responsive

National Town Meeting on Demand Response and Smart Grid – Washington, DC

Smart Buildings for a Smart GridTechnology & Services to Make Buildings Grid Responsive

James Dagley,

Vice President of Channel Marketing and Strategy

June 24, 2010


Intro to johnson controls

Intro to Johnson Controls

140,000 Employees Fortune 100 Multi-Industry Company

  • Founded in 1885 by Warren Johnson, inventor of the first electric room thermostat

  • Over 40,000 employees dedicated to building efficiency in 500+ locations in 125 countries

  • Market leader in HVAC and controls technology

  • 13,000 HVAC technicians, 12,000 facility mgrs

  • Over 1.4B sq ft of space under direct management, with services provided to a further 20B sq ft

  • Largest ESCO in North America with over $4.9 billion of active cost savings guarantees

2


Agenda for today s discussion

Agenda for Today’s Discussion


Smart buildings for a smart grid technology services to make buildings grid responsive

Technologymakes the smart grid possible… . …and buildings are the next wave

Source: Johnson Controls analysis of $3.4 billion in SGIG awarded October 2009


Commercial buildings big load large potential

Commercial buildings – big load, large potential

U.S. Electricity Demand (GW)

Half of U.S. peak demand is medium to large facilities (>20 kW)

Potential Impact of DR (10-yr)

Large C&I

4%

Residential

20%

Small C&I

Medium C&I

Source:North American Electric Reliability Corporation (2009) “2009 Summer Reliability Assessment”

FERC (2009) “A National Assessment of Demand Response Potential”


The building perspective on demand response

The Building Perspective on Demand Response

Cost-Effective

Convenient

  • What do mid to large commercial buildings require in order to be interested in DR?

  • Cost-Effective – economics have to work out

  • Convenient – building operators cannot take on a “second job” to manage load shedding

  • Control – unwilling to allow outside parties (utility, service provider, etc) complete control over load

Technology

Control

Demand Response technology can help with all three


Cost effective automating dr on operations budgets

Cost-effective – Automating DR on operations budgets

Installation cost for DR automation technology

Median payback of projects under PG&E’s Auto-DR program is 2.25 years

Source: PG&E/LBNL AutoDR Pilot, 2006.


Convenient if it s not easy no one will do it

Convenient – If it’s not easy, no one will do it

5% load response without technology

vs.

10%load response with auto-DR technology

Two pilot studies show that automation leads to better response

Source: Global Energy Partners (2007) “PG&E 2007 Auto-DR Program Assessment”

2006 CRA SPP C&I Report; Demand Response Research Center


Control a spectrum of demand response options

Control – A “Spectrum” of Demand Response Options

Logic, decision-making and control can sit with the load-serving entity, the customer, or anywhere between (e.g. an curtailment service provider):

Central Control

Autonomous Control

Critical Peak Pricing

Wholesale EnergyPrograms

Voluntary Demand Bidding

Pure Real Time Price

Interruptible Rate

Wholesale CapacityPrograms

Traditional “Aggregator” Model

Historical DR has been centrally controlled, but there is a push to the right of the spectrum. Buildings benefit.

Direct Load Control(AC Cycling)


Technology can help with cost effectiveness increase convenience and maintain control

Technology can help with cost-effectiveness, increase convenience and maintain control

Market-Based

Event-Based

Direct Load Control

Fixed Time of Use Pricing

Curtailment/Interruptible Rate

Critical Peak Pricing

Demand Limiting

Demand/Capacity Bidding

Dynamic Pricing (RTP)

Smart

Grid

BMS

Integrated Supervisory Control

Energy Storage Energy Loads Onsite Generation

-Set Points -On/Off

Minimize Energy Cost

Maximize Comfort

Building owner pre-defines load reduction strategies, levels and thresholds based on and comfort and cost preferences


Smart buildings for a smart grid technology services to make buildings grid responsive

An example of an automated demand response event

1

9

High summer temps drive up cooling loads

8

2

Automatically dims lighting

Dispatches thermal storage or gen-sets in response to loss in solar PV output

Marginal cost of power increases, T&D systems become congested

7

Throttles servers for non-critical applications

Provides real-time visibility to building

managers

4

3

Ensures fans don’t overcompensate for new CHW set points

6

5

Curtailment signal or real time price provided by ISO/utility

Adjusts space temp, and chilled water temp set points

Prevents PHEVs from charging during peak hours

10

11


Case study automated demand response georgia institute of technology

Case Study – Automated Demand Response:Georgia Institute of Technology

  • Georgia Institute of Technology is on a dynamic hourly tariff from Georgia Power

  • Each hour, building management system reads prices for for next 48 hours from utility’s web service feed

  • Facilities director sets price threshold for automated load shedding mode

Savings during initial summer 2006 pilot

Observing a 1MW peak load reduction, ~7% of load for participating buildings

12


Thank you

Thank You

13


  • Login