1 / 7

Contents

Selected Regulatory Aspects for Remittance Service Providers , by Torsten Schlink (Bankakademie e.V.). Contents. Money Laundering & Financing of Terrorism Financial Action Task Force EC’s “New Legal Framework for Payments in the Internal Market” Impact on Remittance Market Discussion.

agatha
Download Presentation

Contents

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Selected Regulatory Aspects for Remittance Service Providers, by Torsten Schlink (Bankakademie e.V.)

  2. Contents • Money Laundering & Financing of Terrorism • Financial Action Task Force • EC’s “New Legal Framework for Payments in the Internal Market” • Impact on Remittance Market • Discussion

  3. Money Laundering (ML) & Financing of Terrorism (FT) • Informal money remittance system have been existing for ages and they have provided efficient and effective money transfers • In certain circumstances they are even needed (e.g. Afghanistan) • However, since 9/11 especially informal Remittance Service Providers (RSP) are associated with money laundering and financing of terrorism • Thus, ML & FT regulations have been introduced and RSPs shall be licensed/registered

  4. Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Special Recommendation VI • All banks and non-banks shall be subject to all FATF recommendations • Implement consistent anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CTF) measures on all forms of money/value transfer systems • enhance internal controls to cater specifically for AML/CFT risks • undertake customer due diligence procedures • introduce surveillance of suspicious transactions • keep transaction records • report suspicious transactions to national authorities. • Aims at either licensing or registration of informal remittance business • FATF allows governments’ discretion to exempt low-value transactions that fall below a certain threshold from AML/CFT requirements.

  5. EC’s Directive on Payment Services in the Internal Market – Payment Institutions (1) • Directive aims at: • A modern and harmonized legal framework for payment services for the entire internal market • More competition in the field of payments • Increased transparency and legal certainty (in the single payment area) • Applies for payment service providers in the European Union • Covers all currencies, not only the Euro • Authorized payment institutions can expand their businesses to other Member States (“EU passport”)

  6. EC’s Directive on Payment Services in the Internal Market – Payment Institutions (2) • Authorization is to be granted against submission of (among others) • Business plan • Administrative and accounting procedures • Internal control mechanisms (i.e. AML/CFT) • Risk management procedures • Information about the owner(s)/shareholders • Payment institutions shall be • Supervised by a competent authority (to be named by Member State) • listed in a register

  7. Conclusion What will be the impact on the Remittance Market ? • EU – specific: • Market becomes more transparent – but only for the existing Remittance Service Providers (RSP) • Directive does not “invite” Informal Remittance Service Providers • EU aims at full traceability of all transfers, i.e. zero threshold for transfers • Transfers in Euro will become cheaper – but will require bank accounts in the sender and receiver country • In general: • Access to RSPs in receiving countries remains a challenge – outreach must be increased • Channeling remittances through the formal financial sector remains a challenge • Migrants without “proper” ID may remain excluded from formal RSPs • Transaction volume thresholds are welcomed but impact needs to be analyzed

More Related