1 / 24

The KBART Recommended Practice

The KBART Recommended Practice. Nettie Lagace (@ abugseye ) NISO Associate Director for Programs CEAL Workshop on Electronic Resources Standards and Best Practices March 25, 2014. OpenURL query (base URL + metadata string). repository. link resolver/ knowledge base.

agamemnon-elena
Download Presentation

The KBART Recommended Practice

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The KBART Recommended Practice Nettie Lagace (@abugseye) NISO Associate Director for Programs CEAL Workshop on Electronic Resources Standards and Best PracticesMarch 25, 2014

  2. OpenURLquery (base URL+ metadata string) repository link resolver/knowledge base target (cited)article OpenURL basics printcollections gateways article citation database publisherwebsite publisher/providerholdings data

  3. A database Contains information about web resources (global) e.g. what journal holdings are available in JSTOR and how you link to articles in them Contains information about the resources a library has licensed/owns (local) May contain electronic and print holdings (in addition to a number of other services) Used by a link resolver to direct institutional users to the ‘appropriate copy’ What is a KnowledgeBase?

  4. It tracks the library’s content and identifies locations for the content It knows which versions the library is able to access So – it’s the only place that can get a user to the “appropriate copy” … the one that his/her library has licensed. The KnowledgeBase’s Central Role in the Library

  5. More content visible to end users Content linking is more accurate for end users Increase in content usage Maximum reach for authors and editors Better return on investment for library Favorablerenewal decision Protection of revenue for content providers Benefits for All

  6. Where the chain breaks • Wrong data • Publisher gives wrong metadata for title to the KB • Link resolver uses bad metadata to make link • Link does not resolve to correct target • Dead end  • Outdated data • Publisher said it has a particular issue • Link resolver links to an article from it • Issue has been removed • Dead end  • Or, provider doesn’t notify that issue is now live • So no traffic from link resolvers to that issue!

  7. KBART: A simple metadata exchange format

  8. Ebooks • Challenges • Incomplete • Non-standard data • Frequency

  9. Ebooks • Phase I • recommendations were serial-centric • Some fields were dual-purpose • date_first_issue_online • Identifiers • Holding’s content type was ambiguous • Phase II • 8 new monographic fields added • Disambiguation of usage

  10. Ebooks Serials! – Phase II • Serials-only fields for Phase II: • date_first_issue_online • num_first_vol_online • num_first_issue_online • date_last_issue_online • num_last_vol_online • num_last_issue_online

  11. Ebooks and Serials! – Phase II • Fields used for both monographs and serials: • Identifiers • title_id • embargo_info • coverage_depth • coverage_notes • title_url • Publication_type (Serial, Monograph)

  12. New Ebooks fields for Phase II date_monograph_published_print date_monograph_published_online monograph_volume monograph_edition first_editor

  13. Book Series / Proceedings - Phase II • Challenges • Both serial and monograph • Users search for bothtitles • New fields • parent_publication_title_id • preceding_publication_title_id

  14. Open Access OA has gotten more popular Importance of facilitating access to both paid and free peer-reviewed, quality publications (not just fee-based material).

  15. Open Access • Challenges • What to do with Hybrid OA models? • Embargoed Hybrid OA – example: free access until one year ago. • Title transfer OA – title changes from OA to paid (or vice versa) upon transfer to another publisher. • Author-paid OA – some articles fee-based. • Full OA – all content is free • Title-level vs. article-level OA metadata

  16. Open Access The decision was made not to differentiate between Free and OA for KBART. Needed to strike a balance between noting significant OA content and making the file understandable.

  17. Open Access • Free-text coverage_notes field suggested to explain subtleties of OA availability for that particular title. • New field – access_type • “F” – title is mostly fee-based (subscription/purchase) • “OA” – 50% or more of the title is OA/freely accessible.

  18. Consortia Survey results Libraries purchase titles as a consortium Consortium administrators and librarians need the same title-level information from their consortium-purchased packages as they do from “vanilla” publisher packages. Difficult to obtain accurate consortium-specific title lists.

  19. Consortia • We re-state the importance of providing a separate file for each “Global” package that the Content Provider offers. • Consortium-specific files should be created when: • A unique set of titles has been packaged for the consortium, different than the Content Provider’s standard packages. • A package contains unique dates of coverage.

  20. Consortia • Changes to file naming for ALL files. • Addition of “Region/Consortium” value in file structure. • [ProviderName]_[Region/Consortium]_[Package Name]_[YYYY-MM-DD].txt • Applicable to Consortia packages and Regional variants (e.g., “Asia-Pacific”, “Germany”, etc.) • “Global” value is used if the package is available for all libraries to purchase.

  21. Consortia – New File Name Examples • Title list is not region or consortium-specific, includes all titles from the content provider: • JSTOR_Global_AllTitles_2008-12-01.txt • Taylor & Francis_Global_AllTitles_2012-08-30 • Title list is consortium-specific, for a specific package: • IOP_NESLi2_Option 1 (2011)_2012-05-31.txt (includes a year as part of the package name) • Oxford_SCELC_AllTitles_2012-01-09.txt (contains all titles that the consortium has subscribed to) • Title list is region-specific, for a specific package: • Springer_Asia-Pacific_Medicine_2012-08-03.txt

  22. KBART’s lifespan Phase 1 – Universally accepted standardized publisher metadata, regularly distributed AND available on demand Phase 2 – Broad adoption, Consortia, More content type coverage (eBooks, conference proceedings), Open Access materials • Final document now in last stage of NISO approval before publication Phase 3? – Even more content types, automated delivery, institutional metadata????

  23. PublisherInvolvement Everything can be found at http://www.uksg.org/kbart/endorsement Review the requirements (data samples available) Format your title lists accordingly. Self-check to ensure they conform to the recommended practice Ensure that you have a process in place for regular data updates Register your organization on the KBART registry website: http://bit.ly/kbartregistry

  24. Thank you! Questions?nlagace@niso.org @abugseye Spring Colors! by cerebros1 is licensed under CC-BY 2.0

More Related