International conference on festivals and event research orlando florida 20 january 2009
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 12

International Conference on Festivals and Event Research Orlando, Florida 20 January 2009 PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 80 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

International Conference on Festivals and Event Research Orlando, Florida 20 January 2009. Please Don’t Stop the Music! An Exploratory Study of Alternative Approaches to Public Sector Evaluation and Funding Policies for Cultural Events Preliminary Findings Dr. Rebecca Finkel and

Download Presentation

International Conference on Festivals and Event Research Orlando, Florida 20 January 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


International conference on festivals and event research orlando florida 20 january 2009

International Conference on Festivals and Event ResearchOrlando, Florida20 January 2009

Please Don’t Stop the Music!

An Exploratory Study of Alternative Approaches to Public Sector Evaluation and Funding Policies

for Cultural Events

Preliminary Findings

Dr. Rebecca Finkel and

Dr. Joe Goldblatt, CSEP

Kuan-wen Lin, MBA


Agenda

Agenda

  • Purpose and rationale of study

  • History of Edinburgh and Glasgow Cultural Events

  • Stakeholders

  • Hypotheses and Research Questions

  • Methodology

  • Preliminary Findings

  • Discussion


Purpose of research

Purpose of Research

  • Identify potential sustainable sources of funding for Edinburgh and Glasgow cultural events.

  • Examine the emerging conflicts between public support and private interests (Myerscough and Bruce, 1988).

  • Develop sustainable models of funding for Edinburgh and Glasgow cultural events.


Rationale for research

Rationale for Research

  • Edinburgh and Glasgow cultural events are largely dependent upon public subsidy for their continuing operations.

  • The public purse is reducing in size each year due to limited resources and competing demands (AEA Consulting, 2006).

  • Historical expectation of public support by the cultural sector - the growth of public arts subsidies represented the cultural branch of the welfare state (McGuigan, 1996, 20).


Edinburgh and glasgow

Edinburgh and Glasgow


Stakeholders

Stakeholders

  • Festival and cultural events community

  • Government (MSP’s, Local Council)‏

  • Bureaucrats

  • Sponsors


Hypotheses and research questions

Hypotheses and Research Questions


Research methods

Research Methods

  • Quantitative study of funding history of UK cultural sector and the Edinburgh festivals.

  • Quantitative analysis of return on investment from Edinburgh festival public funding.

  • In-depth semi-structured interviews with key informants from cultural, government and commercial sectors.

  • Analyse quantitative and qualitative findings to identify potential sources of sustainable funding.


Preliminary findings

Preliminary Findings

  • Quantitative: Gap between public purse and the productivity of the cultural sector.

  • Instrumentalist argument informs and guides most cultural policy decisions (Holden, 2004; 2006; Mirza, 2006).

  • Main concern is future stability due to short term funding approaches.

  • Consensus between Glasgow and Edinburgh regarding the need for new sources of sustainable funding.


Preliminary findings con t

Preliminary Findings con't.

  • General consensus is that these sources will include greater individual and corporate support through voluntary philanthropy.

  • General consensus is that these sources will also require a redirection of council or federal taxes that are derived from businesses that directly benefit from the cultural sector.

  • Disagreement about the future dependence by the cultural sector on public funding.

  • Glasgow embraces new entrepreneurial government (Glasgow Culture and Sport) versus Festivals Edinburgh (Council initiative).


Discussion

Discussion


References

References

AEA Consulting (2006) Thundering hooves: maintaining the global competitive edge of Edinburgh’s festivals: Full report. Commissioned by the Scottish Arts Council in partnership with Festivals Edinburgh, City of Edinburgh Council, Scottish Executive, EventScotland and Scottish Enterprise Edinburgh and Lothian: Edinburgh.

Holden, J. (2004) Capturing cultural value: how culture has become a tool of government policy. London: Demos.

Holden, J. (2006) Cultural value and the crisis of legitimacy: why culture needs a democratic mandate. London: Demos.

Mirza, M. (ed) (2006) Culture vultures: Is UK arts policy damaging the arts?. London: Policy Exchange.

McGuigan, J. (1996) Culture and the public sphere. London: Routledge.

Myerscough, J. and Bruce, A. (1988) The economic importance of the arts in Britain. London: Policy Studies Institute.


  • Login