Policy incentives for intellectual property development
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 12

POLICY INCENTIVES FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 44 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

POLICY INCENTIVES FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT. PEREZ W.J ODERO LEGAL CONSULTANT 5 TH JUNE 2005. SPECIFIC RIGHTS AND UNFAIR COMPETITION :. SUBJECT MATTER IPR BY APPLICATION DURATION FULL MONOPOLY? EQUILIBRIUM BY LEGISLATION. JUSTIFICATION FOR IPRS. LAW AND ECONOMICS

Download Presentation

POLICY INCENTIVES FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Policy incentives for intellectual property development

POLICY INCENTIVES FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT

PEREZ W.J ODERO

LEGAL CONSULTANT

5TH JUNE 2005


Specific rights and unfair competition

SPECIFIC RIGHTS AND UNFAIR COMPETITION:

  • SUBJECT MATTER

  • IPR BY APPLICATION

  • DURATION

  • FULL MONOPOLY?

  • EQUILIBRIUM BY LEGISLATION


Justification for iprs

JUSTIFICATION FOR IPRS

  • LAW AND ECONOMICS

  • COMPETITION

  • LABOUR JUSTIFICATION

  • PUBLIC DOMAIN


Usa 1

USA 1

  • TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER

  • SCIENCE TO INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIALISATION

  • RESEARCH FUNDING BY GOVERNMENT

  • ESTABLISHMENT OF NIH, NSF AND ONR

  • NO FUNDING POLICY


Usa 2

USA 2

  • LITTLE SUCCESS BY INDUSTRY WITH NEW TECHNOLOGY

  • NO UNIVERSAL POLICY ON OWNERSHIP OF INVENTIONS

  • CONFLICTING FUNDING POLICIES REDUCED GOVT FUNDING TO PRIVATE SECTORS

  • RESTRUCTIONS ON LICENSING


Usa 3

USA 3

  • 1980 28,000 PATENTS BY GOVT

  • 5% ONLY EXPLOITED BY INDUSTRY

  • COMPANIES UNWILLING TO INVEST

  • PUBLIC FINANCED RESEARCH NOT GAINING


Good patent policy

GOOD PATENT POLICY

  • PROMOTE USE OF GOVT FUNDED INVENTIONS

  • GOVT TO PRACTICE INVENTIONS

  • IP RIGHTS IN ITS INVENTIONS USED FAIRLY

  • UNIFORM PRINCIPLES

  • BEST QUALIFIED CONTRACTORS


Evolution

EVOLUTION

  • CONGRESS WISER

  • PATENTS DELIVERY TO PUBLIC

  • TITLE OF INVENTION TO UNIVERSITY AND SMALL BUSINESS GOOD

  • PATENT POLICY NOT GOOD

  • CHANGES; TITLE TO CONTRACTOR


Bayh dole act

BAYH - DOLE ACT

  • INCREASE IN TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER

  • UNIFORM PATENTING/LICENSING PROCESS

  • CERTANITY TO TITLE


Bayh dole act results

BAYH-DOLE ACT RESULTS

  • POSITIVE CHANGES IN PATENTS MANAGEMENT

  • GOVERNMENT PROMOTED ADOPTION OF NEW TECHNOLOGY

  • FEDERAL POLICY ON IN INVENTIONS BY CONTRACTORS GRANTEES

  • PATENTS/LICENSING THE UNIVERSITIES LED TO COMMERCIALISATION

  • INFRASTRUCTURES FOR TECHNOLOGY ESTABLISHED IN UNIVERSITIES

  • GOVT UNIVERSITIES COOPERATING TO COMMERCIALISE INVENTIONS IN PUBLIC INTEREST


Patents for developing countries

PATENTS FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

  • NEED FOR PATENTS?

  • TYPE

  • FOREIGN TECHNOLOGY PROTECTION


Industrial property act

INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY ACT

  • PATENTS REGISTERED BY KIPI

  • REASON WHY PROTECT IPR

  • EMPLOYEE INVENTOR REWARDED

  • EMPLOYER PATENTEE

  • PATENTS MAY BE LICENSED


  • Login