Breast cancer
Download
1 / 38

Breast Cancer - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 119 Views
  • Uploaded on

Breast Cancer . Who Gets What Type of Surgery? Murray Pfeifer 16 th August, 2014. History of Breast Cancer Treatment. Hipppocrates (460-375BC) spoke of two cases Galen (129-200AD) Humoral theory Linked to melancholia Likened to a ‘crab’

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Breast Cancer ' - africa


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Breast cancer

Breast Cancer

Who Gets What Type of Surgery?

Murray Pfeifer

16th August, 2014


History of breast cancer treatment
History of Breast Cancer Treatment

  • Hipppocrates (460-375BC) spoke of two cases

  • Galen (129-200AD)

    • Humoral theory

    • Linked to melancholia

    • Likened to a ‘crab’

    • Recognised the merit of local excision were possible

  • LeDran 1757 proposed the theory that breast cancer is a local disease

    • Spread at first occurs through the lymphatics to lymph nodes before subsequently entering the general circulation

    • This hypothesis suggests that breast cancer can be cured if treated early with aggressive surgery to the breast.

    • This ‘local theory’ prevailed for about two centuries and was the basis on which radical breast operations were offered to women


The modern era 1
The Modern Era (1)

W Sampson Handley’s ‘Theory of Lymphatic Permeation’ was mooted around 1860

Centrifugal lymphatic permeation is the mechanism for the spread of cancer

This gave support to the radical operations being advocated by Halstead, Moore and others

McWhirter – simple mastectomy supplemented with XRT resulted in the same survival as patients who had radical surgery


The m odern era 2
The Modern Era (2)

Bernard Fisher:

Lymph nodes not an effective barrier to spread

Cancer cells pass easily back and forth between lymphatics and blood vessels

Spread of cancer therefore not an orderly progression from lymphatics to blood stream

Gershon-Cohen:

Breast cancers have a protracted period of occult growth during which time they have a ample opportunity to metastasize

This limits the surgical curability of breast cancer

These theories of breast cancer spread were widely adopted and started a movement to less aggressive surgery


Who gets surgery
Who gets surgery?

  • Almost all women with invasive and in situ breast cancer will receive surgery as part of their management

  • Purpose of surgery:

    • To control the locoregional disease by

      • Extirpation of the primary tumour

      • Removal of involved regional lymph nodes

  • Relative contraindications to surgery:

    • Advanced age and frailty

    • Advanced disease


What are the operations that are available to us to manage invasive breast cancer
What are the operations that are available to us to manage invasive breast cancer?

  • For the primary lesion in the breast:

    • Mastectomy

    • Wide local excision

    • +/- breast reconstruction

      • Immediate

      • delayed

  • For the axilla:

    • Sentinel node biopsy

    • Axillary clearance


Mastectomy
Mastectomy: invasive

Mastectomy has become increasingly conservative as a result of our better understanding of tumour biology

Simple mastectomy aims to remove almost all breast tissue including the axillary tail of the breast, the nipple/ areolar complex, and the underlying pectoral fascia

The need for XRT is obviated in most cases


Indications for simple mastectomy
Indications for simple mastectomy: invasive

  • Large tumour/ small breast

  • Centrally located tumour

  • Multifocal and multicentric cancers

  • Recurrence of cancer previously managed by breast conserving treatment

  • Patient choice

    • Arguably lower local recurrence rates

    • Avoidance of XRT

    • Social aspects of access to XRT at a remote site


Breast conserving treatment
Breast Conserving Treatment: invasive

Wide local excision

And

Radiotherapy

Radiotherapy after BCT is mandatory

  • NSABP B-06

    • recurrence rate after surgery alone – 35%

    • Recurrence rate after surgery and XRT – 10%


Objectives of breast conserving treatment bct
Objectives of Breast Conserving Treatment(BCT): invasive

Good control of the primary cancer

Survival equivalence to mastectomy

Cosmetically acceptable outcome


Good control of the primary tumour
Good control of the primary invasive tumour:

Ipsilateral Breast Tumour Recurrence(IBTR) represents local therapeutic failure and psychological stress for the patient

Minimising IBTR depends on adequate resection of the primary tumour and good radiotherapy to the breast

Risk of dissemination of tumour is increased and survival decreased after local recurrence

IBTR increases risk of dissemination by 3-4x (Fisher et)


How much is enough
How much is enough? invasive

Criteria for acceptable margins is, with time becoming more conservative

  • Previous standard:

    • Ideal >1cm

    • Close but acceptable 5mm-1mm

  • ASTRO and SSO consensus guideline Feb 2014

    • Meta-analysis 33 studies; 28,162 patients

    • Positive margins are associated with a >2x risk of IBTR

    • Negative margins (no ink on tumour)optimise IBTR. Wider margins do not lower risk

    • Rates of IBTR are reduced with use of systemic therapy


Contraindications to bct
Contraindications to BCT invasive

More than one tumour

Large tumour, small breast

Diffuse, suspicious microcalcifications

Previous radiotherapy to the breast

Collagen disorders may result in an adverse response to XRT

Central tumours where there is a need to excise the nipple/areolar complex

Patient choice with respect to XRT


Morbidity of bct
Morbidity of BCT: invasive

Poor cosmesis

Wound complications

Altered nipple sensation

Initial inflammation in the skin post XRT

Later skin thickening and woody contracture of the breast

Post XRT fatigue

Radiation damage to underlying lung and heart

Radiation induced neoplasms egangiosarcoma (1 in 476 patients)

Risk of salvage mastectomy


Is there a survival equivalence between bct and mastectomy in sti ii cancers
Is there a survival equivalence between BCT and Mastectomy in STI-II cancers:

Yes there is!!

Numerous controlled trials have consistently demonstrated this point

Early Breast Trialist Group meta-analysis of 7 RCTs showed no difference in 10 year overall survival rates


Surgery of the axilla
Surgery of the axilla: in STI-II cancers:

Decisions about management of the axilla are made quite independently from decisions about the management of the primary cancer


Why operate on the axilla
Why operate on the axilla? in STI-II cancers:

To assess prognosis

To ‘stage’ the disease for purposes of determining indication for adjuvant systemic therapies and radiotherapy

To resect disease that might be present in the axillary lymph nodes.


Who gets axillary surgery
Who gets axillary surgery? in STI-II cancers:

  • Almost all women with invasive breast cancer

  • Selected women with DCIS

    • Published data – Upgrade diagnosis of DCIS on core bx in around 20% (range 13-40%)

    • About 10% of patients with high risk DCIS have +ve sentinel node (high risk=high grade, large size)

    • Indications for sentinel node biopsy:

      • High grade

      • Large lesion

      • Extensive involvement

      • mastectomy


The operations
The Operations in STI-II cancers:

Two Operations:

  • Sentinel node biopsy

  • Axillary dissection


Sentinel lymph node biopsy
Sentinel lymph node biopsy in STI-II cancers:

The sentinel lymph node is the hypothetical first node or group of nodes draining a cancer

First mooted by Gould (1960) for parotid cancer

Popularised by Cabanas for penile cancer

Used extensively in breast cancer, melanoma, and head and neck cancer


Who gets sentinel node biopsy
Who gets Sentinel node biopsy? in STI-II cancers:

  • Women who have invasive breast cancer and fulfil the following criteria:

    • Small tumour (T1 or T2)

    • No identifiable axillary lymph node involvement

  • Exclusions:

    • Large tumours (T3 or T4)

    • Suspicious or proven positive axillary nodes

    • Prior axillary surgery

    • Prior cosmetic breast surgery

    • Following neoadjuvant systemic therapy


  • Sentinel node biopsy principles
    Sentinel node biopsy – principles in STI-II cancers:

    Combined technique of vital blue dye and radioisotope.

    Technitiumlabelledsulphur colloid injected the day prior to surgery. Usually accompanied by scintngram and CT SPECT

    Blue dye > periareolar injection after induction of anaesthesia

    Combined technique associated with a higher degree of identification of the sentinel node than the use of one or other technique alone.


    Sentinel node biopsy principles1
    Sentinel node biopsy principles in STI-II cancers:

    Node(s) can either be sent for frozen section whilst the patient is on the table with a view to completing the axillary dissection if positive

    Or

    Node(s) can be sent for paraffin section with a view to subsequent further treatment if positive


    How reliable is sentinel node biopsy
    How reliable is sentinel node biopsy? in STI-II cancers:

    • Numerous studies including NSABP B-32, ALMANAC, Milan, and SNAC1 have reported:

      • A success rate of 90-98%

      • False negative rate 5.5 – 15.7%

      • Our own SNAC trial reported a false negative rate - 5.5%


    Management of the axilla where there has been a positive sentinel node biopsy
    Management of the axilla where there has been a positive sentinel node biopsy

    • Controversial but usually completion axillary dissection +/- radiotherapy

    • Management is tending to become more conservative

      • Isolated tumour cells and micrometastases are usually managed with radiotherapy only

      • More extensive axillary disease is now being managed by XRT alone


    Eorct amaros study asco 2013 emeil rutgers
    EORCT AMAROS Study sentinel ASCO 2013 – Emeil Rutgers

    • RCT – Surgery v XRT

    • Five year follow up

    • Results:

      • Local recurrence 0.54% v 1.03%

      • Disease free survival 86.7% v 82.7%

      • Overall survival 93.3% v 92.5%

      • Lymphoedema 28% v 14%


    Axillary dissection
    Axillary Dissection sentinel

    Does it still have place?

    Yes……. But less so than in years gone by


    Axillary dissection why we do it
    Axillary dissection – why we do it sentinel

    • Stage the axilla for prognosis

    • Inform the planning of adjuvant therapies

    • Locoregional control of disease

      • 30-40% of patients presenting with breast cancer have disease in the axillary nodes

      • Recurrence rate after axillary dissection <2%

      • Therefore an improvement in DFS

    • Possible improvement in overall survival (but note NSABP B-04 – no survival advantage for patients with clinically negative axilla who had ALND compared to the group in whom an expectant approach was taken).


    Who gets axillary dissection
    Who gets axillary dissection? sentinel

    • Patients with large tumours – T3 or T4

    • Patients with confirmed axillary node metastasis

      • Palpable enlarged axillary lymph nodes

      • Suspicious axillary nodes seen on ultrasound examination of the axilla

      • Usually confirmed by ultrasound guided FNA cytology


    The morbidity of axillary dissection
    The morbidity of axillary dissection: sentinel

    Wound infection

    Seroma

    Pain, parasthesia, and numbness in the distribution of the intercostobrachial nerve

    Frozen shoulder

    lymphoedema


    Is sentinel node biopsy superior to axillary dissection with respect to complications
    Is sentinel node biopsy superior to axillary dissection with respect to complications?

    • ACSOG Z0011, ALMANAC both show that there is significantly less morbidity after SLNB when compared to ALND (70% adverse effects v 25% overall)

    • Inconsistent application of protocols and incomplete data capture was a problem in both of these two studies as it has been in other published studies.


    Ductal carcinoma in situ
    Ductal Carcinoma In Situ respect to

    A condition in which presumably malignant cells proliferate within lactiferous ducts with no evidence of invasion through the basement membrane

    Heterogeneous pathology with highly variable appearance, biology and behaviour

    Represents around 20% of the caseload

    Is largely a disease entity of the mammographic era

    The approach to surgical management is somewhat different


    What surgery is offered
    What surgery is offered? respect to

    Mastectomy +/- reconstruction is a commonly utilised option

    • Best for large lesions, and multifocal/multicentric lesions

    • Low local recurrence rate (1%-2%)

    • In most instances obviates the need for XRT

    • For many patients it represents too much treatment

    • Psychosocial issues:

      • For some the reassurance of a high probability of cure is reassuring

      • For others there is the psychological morbidity of what might be perceived as a mutilating operation


    What surgery is offered1
    What surgery is offered: respect to

    Wide local excision

    Wide local excision alone is associated with a high local recurrence rate (NSABP 20.9% at 5years)

    May be acceptable in selected patients ie small, non high grade lesions with good margins (>10mm)

    Wide local excision plus XRT lower local recurrence rates (8%-10% at 5years)

    About half of the local recurrences are invasive


    What margins are required in bct for dcis
    What margins are required in BCT for DCIS? respect to

    A vexed question in this condition because of the high incidence of multifocality and multicentricity which makes pathological assessment of margins difficult

    NZ guideline – margin should be >2mm

    Ideal is 10mm

    Involved margins demands further surgery


    Management of the axilla in dcis
    Management of the Axilla in DCIS respect to

    • Theoretically DCIS should not involve nodes

    • In practice microinvasion or even overt invasive disease in another part of a lesion may result in nodal metastasis in up to 25% of lesions diagnosed as DCIS on work up

    • Risk factors:

      • Large tumour

      • High grade

      • Palpable tumour

      • Mammographic density


    Should patients with a preoperative diagnosis of dcis have sentinel node biopsy
    Should patients with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS have sentinel node biopsy?

    Indications for sentinel node biopsy in DCIS:

    Large lesion

    High grade

    Palpable tumour

    Mammographic density

    Patient is having a mastectomy


    Who gets what operation
    Who gets what operation? sentinel node biopsy?

    40 years ago -

    MASTECTOMY and AXILLARY DISSECTION

    Today –

    Multi disiplinary approach with surgery tailored to the needs of the patient and her condition and integrated with radiotherpy and systemic therapies

    Thankyou


    ad