Noontime seminar dod research funding processes
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 23

Noontime Seminar: DoD Research Funding Processes PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 90 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Noontime Seminar: DoD Research Funding Processes. John Albrecht 15 April 2014. Noontime Seminar: DoD Research Funding Processes. John Albrecht 15 April 2014. DoD Major Appropriation Categories. APPN CAT. FUNDING POLICY. SCOPE. RDT & E PROC (SCN) O & M MILPER MILCON.

Download Presentation

Noontime Seminar: DoD Research Funding Processes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Noontime seminar dod research funding processes

Noontime Seminar: DoD Research Funding Processes

John Albrecht

15 April 2014


Noontime seminar dod research funding processes1

Noontime Seminar: DoD Research Funding Processes

John Albrecht

15 April 2014


Dod major appropriation categories

DoD Major Appropriation Categories

APPN CAT

FUNDINGPOLICY

SCOPE

RDT & E

PROC (SCN)

O & M

MILPER

MILCON

RDT&E Activities & Expenses

End items >= $100K system unit cost, All Centrally managed items, Initial Spares, Labor for certain production-related functions (e.g., item assembly, quality assurance)

Replenishment Spares, Fuel, Civilian Salaries, Construction Projects < $750K, Travel, Non-centrally managed end items < $100K system unit cost

Military Personnel Expenses

Construction Projects >= $750K

INCREMENTAL

FULL

ANNUAL

ANNUAL

FULL


Dod appropriation structure

Procurement

O&M

RDT&E

MILPER

MILCON

Budget

Activity

Budget

Activity

Budget

Activity

Budget

Activity

Budget

Activity

Activity

Group

Activity

Group

Program

Elements

Activity

Group

Line Item

Sub Activity

Projects

Project

Sub Activity

DoD Appropriation Structure


Dod appropriation structure1

Procurement

O&M

RDT&E

MILPER

MILCON

Budget

Activity

Budget

Activity

Budget

Activity

Budget

Activity

Budget

Activity

Activity

Group

Activity

Group

Program

Elements

Activity

Group

Line Item

Sub Activity

Projects

Project

Sub Activity

DoD Appropriation Structure


Dod research funding sources

DoD Research Funding Sources

  • 6.1, 6.2, 6.3 (basic, applied, and demonstration level research)

    • 6.1 is the closest DoD equivalent to NSF-style funding (ONR, AFOSR, ARO, DARPA, …) – primarily grants

    • 6.2 typically supports “big program” winners (e.g. microelectronics programs taking devices to circuits) or first attempts at applications. Spans the services (AFRL, ONR, DARPA, ARL, …)

      • May be declared fundamental campus research OR come with restrictions (mandatory pre-pub review, etc)

      • Often is ITAR and otherwise export controlled

      • Solicitations (such as BAAs) will contain language discussing how these are handled and the contracting officers will adhere

    • 6.3 is advanced development money = functional prototypes, heavy deliverables, transition partners to the industrial base (ONR, DARPA, MDA, AFRL, NAVSEA, ARL (long list))

      • By law, all 6.3 money from DoD comes with restrictive clauses that cannot be removed by the contracting officer

      • Very likely to be export controlled, at a minimum


Dod research funding sources1

DoD Research Funding Sources

  • 6.1, 6.2, 6.3 (basic, applied, and demonstration level research)

    • 6.1 is the closest DoD equivalent to NSF-style funding (ONR, AFOSR, ARO, DARPA, …) – primarily grants

    • 6.2 typically supports “big program” winners (e.g. microelectronics programs taking devices to circuits) or first attempts at applications. Spans the services (AFRL, ONR, DARPA, ARL, …)

      • May be declared fundamental campus research OR come with restrictions (mandatory pre-pub review, etc)

      • Often is ITAR and otherwise export controlled

      • Solicitations (such as BAAs) will contain language discussing how these are handled and the contracting officers will adhere

    • 6.3 is advanced development money = functional prototypes, heavy deliverables, transition partners to the industrial base (ONR, DARPA, MDA, AFRL, NAVSEA, ARL (long list))

      • By law, all 6.3 money from DoD comes with restrictive clauses that cannot be removed by the contracting officer

      • Very likely to be export controlled, at a minimum


Dod appropriation structure2

Procurement

O&M

RDT&E

MILPER

MILCON

Budget

Activity

Budget

Activity

Budget

Activity

Budget

Activity

Budget

Activity

Activity

Group

Activity

Group

Program

Elements

Activity

Group

Line Item

Sub Activity

Projects

Project

Sub Activity

DoD Appropriation Structure


Additional research funding sources

Additional Research Funding Sources

  • SBIR/STTR – Small Business Innovative Research, Small business Technology TransfeR

    • SBIR/STTR has its own opportunity website outside of fed biz ops

    • SBIR has to be >50% at the business

    • STTR can have large university components

    • Phase 2s are subject to funds availability

    • SBIR is not appropriated, it is an unfunded mandate that is a percentage tax internal to every agency. (It comes out of your 6.1 money too!)

    • SBIR has favorable IP rules that do not enforce govt use claims and restrictions

    • SBIR/STTR topics can and do come with export control restrictions

  • Non-traditional Examples: Director’s Innovation Initiative (NRO), Joint DoD programs with other agencies, Manufacturing Initiatives


Other variations of funding

Other variations of funding…

  • MURI – Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative

    • Each service’s 6.1 unit proposes topics (annually)

    • Office of the Secretary of Defense chooses

    • 3 year base, 2 year option at ~$1.5M/year

    • Often large teams

    • Does not come out of the base budget of the unit

  • Internal forms of MURI-like activity

    • Example: AFOSR BRI topics

    • Large programs formed within an agency to reward/punish program quality and execution

  • Congressional Insert Items

    • Significant change over last decade  often are forcibly inserted as unfunded mandates (core budgets have to be re-worked to accommodate them) Result: Your lab friends my find them onerous.

    • Scrutiny on execution has become intense from service leaders

  • Labs

    • Caution: Labs influence more money than they spend on external research (NRL, AFRL are primarily using 6.2 to service salaries at this point).

    • No external 6.1 funding, but they can have great influence.


Other variations of funding1

Other variations of funding…

  • MURI – Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative

    • Each service’s 6.1 unit proposes topics (annually)

    • Office of the Secretary of Defense chooses

    • 3 year base, 2 year option at ~$1.5M/year

    • Often large teams

    • Does not come out of the base budget of the unit

  • Internal forms of MURI-like activity

    • Example: AFOSR BRI topics

    • Large programs formed within an agency to reward/punish program quality and execution

  • Congressional Insert Items

    • Significant change over last decade  often are forcibly inserted as unfunded mandates (core budgets have to be re-worked to accommodate them) Result: Your lab friends my find them onerous.

    • Scrutiny on execution has become intense from service leaders

  • Labs

    • Caution: Labs influence more money than they spend on external research (NRL, AFRL are primarily using 6.2 to service salaries at this point).

    • No external 6.1 funding, but they can have great influence.


Where do i look

Where do I look?

  • Federal Business Opportunities

    • https://www.fbo.gov/

    • https://www.sbir.gov/

    • Proposer’s Day announcements

    • Proposal Abstract requests (Do This. Always.)

  • Agency websites are typically very responsive about posting new solicitations or funding policies and procedures

  • Existing programs

    • Existing programs have money.

    • Large 6.2 programs generate basic research topics

    • Stay current with the literature and any public program reviews in your area.

      • There are dedicated conferences to show off DoD programs


Key elements of dod proposals 1

Key Elements of DoD Proposals -1

  • Read the solicitation carefully and completely

    • Technical specifications and any mandatory thresholds

    • Proposal structure expectations and preparation instructions

    • FAQs are posted, public forums are often held

    • What constitutes technical compliance

      • Complete solutions only?

      • Are any technical approaches specifically excluded?

  • Technical innovation and responsiveness to the solicitation

    • Does the proposed solution break down the technical challenges and systematically address them?

    • Does the proposal demonstrate a sound understanding of the current state of practice?

    • Is there existing data to support the claimed research path?


Key elements of dod proposals

Key Elements of DoD Proposals

  • Clear SOW that has tasks supporting technical solution

    • Do the tasks match the proposed solutions to the key technical challenges?

    • Are the resources clearly identified (people/time/money) and adequate? Do they match the cost proposal and schedule?

    • Are the tasks aligned with the schedule (critical path, long-lead items)?

    • Recommend marking SOW on a task basis if there is a mix of fundamental research and export controlled or restricted work

  • Schedule and project structure

    • If you are bidding a 6.2 project, install Microsoft Project and plot a gantt chart

    • Does it match the SOW and cost volume of the proposal exactly?

  • Cost Proposals

    • Is the formatting compliant with the solicitation (non-compliance = rejection)

    • Does it match up with the SOW and Schedule

    • Are the sub-contractor proposals in place and compliant

    • Is it realistic? DoD proposals that are incorrectly over/under budgeted in time/money are strongly downgraded.

    • Watch out for equipment (computers are not equipment, they are IT within DoD)


So you won now what

So you won, now what?

  • Be diligent during contract negotiation

    • Answer requests from OSP or your program manager promptly and accurately (the most dangerous word in the English language is “send”)

    • Primary clarification questions are on budgets

    • Fill out ECORRW (export control) forms early

      • Include the proposal and solicitation if at all possible

      • Contact me before submitting if you need to check the database for potential controls – don’t make up answers or allow the export control office to interpret for you.

  • Expect that any restrictions in the solicitation will and can apply to your work (CDAs too)

  • The government can change the award instrument

    • E.g., Grant Awards cannot contain physical deliverables


Post award

Post-Award

  • Get an account. If there are lengthy negotiations, request a hardship account (Dr. Chatti).

    • Most 6.1 DoD money authorizes 90 days pre-award expenditure within certain budget limitations

    • Understand your post-award accounting procedures

      • Is the DoD expecting montly invoicing (MSU default is quarterly)?

      • Are you allowed to change the labor mix under the rules of your award?

      • What is your sponsor’s policy on no-cost extensions?

      • Are you incrementally funded or milestone based?

  • Execution, execution, execution.

    • DoD funding rewards those that follow the contract plan

    • There have been movements to severely limit NCEs


Budget execution

Budget Execution

Congress

DFAS Region

Finance Center

US Treasury

OMB

DFAS

Disbursing /

Finance Office

OSD Comptroller

Service

Comptroller

PCO

Procuring

Contract

Officer

ACO

Administrative

Contract

Officer

MAJCOM/PEO

Comptroller

Commitment

C-Color

Y-Year

A-Amount

PMO

Program

Management

Office

Contractor


Budget execution1

Budget Execution

Congress

DFAS Region

Finance Center

US Treasury

OMB

DFAS

Disbursing /

Finance Office

OSD Comptroller

Service

Comptroller

PCO

Procuring

Contract

Officer

ACO

Administrative

Contract

Officer

MAJCOM/PEO

Comptroller

Obligation

Contractor

PMO

Program

Management

Office


Budget execution2

Budget Execution

Congress

DFAS Region

Finance Center

US Treasury

OMB

DFAS

Disbursing /

Finance Office

OSD Comptroller

Service

Comptroller

Invoice

PCO

Procuring

Contract

Officer

ACO

Administrative

Contract

Officer

MAJCOM/PEO

Comptroller

Invoice

Contractor

PMO

Program

Management

Office

  • Starts work

  • Incurs cost


Budget execution3

Budget Execution

Congress

DFAS Region

Finance Center

US Treasury

OMB

DFAS

Disbursing /

Finance Office

OSD Comptroller

Service

Comptroller

Check

PCO

Procuring

Contract

Officer

ACO

Administrative

Contract

Officer

MAJCOM/PEO

Comptroller

Expenditure

Contractor

PMO

Program

Management

Office


Budget execution4

Budget Execution

Congress

DFAS Region

Finance Center

US Treasury

OMB

Expenditure

Reporting

System

DFAS

Disbursing /

Finance Office

OSD Comptroller

Service

Comptroller

PCO

Procuring

Contract

Officer

ACO

Administrative

Contract

Officer

MAJCOM/PEO

Comptroller

Contractor

PMO

Program

Management

Office


Budget execution5

Budget Execution

Congress

DFAS Region

Finance Center

US Treasury

OMB

DFAS

Disbursing /

Finance Office

Cash

OSD Comptroller

Service

Comptroller

Outlay

PCO

Procuring

Contract

Officer

ACO

Administrative

Contract

Officer

MAJCOM/PEO

Comptroller

Contractor

PMO

Program

Management

Office


Summary

Summary

  • Understand the DoD opportunities in your technical area (agencies, timing, color of money)

  • Write clean proposals

    • Technical responsiveness

    • Cost and schedule

    • SOW development (especially for contracts)

  • Understand any restrictions that can be expected for this research

    • Do not assume they will go away in negotiation

  • Vigorously manage your post award execution

    • The DoD does reward good behavior in this area

    • Tell your program manager about know execution problems before they become acute


  • Login