1 / 21

Replacing PERC with safer alternatives in dry cleaning

Replacing PERC with safer alternatives in dry cleaning . Steve Whittaker Local Hazardous Waste Management Program Public Health – Seattle & King County. Outline. History of dry cleaning Dry cleaning solvents The problem with PERC An industry in crisis What is LHWMP doing?

afia
Download Presentation

Replacing PERC with safer alternatives in dry cleaning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Replacing PERC with safer alternatives in dry cleaning Steve Whittaker Local Hazardous Waste Management Program Public Health – Seattle & King County

  2. Outline • History of dry cleaning • Dry cleaning solvents • The problem with PERC • An industry in crisis • What is LHWMP doing? • What else could be done?

  3. Evolution of Dry Cleaning Solvents Pre 1960s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s • Liquid CO2 • High-flashhydrocarbons • Siloxane • Glycol ethers • 1-bp • Water! • Kerosene • Turpentine • Naptha • Benzene • Stoddard • Carbon tet. • TCE PERC use peaks PERC introduced California: PERC phase-out Acetal (Solvon K4)

  4. Nothing cleans like PERC Chemical Formula: C2Cl4 PERC (tetrachloroethylene) – 69% Hydrocarbons – 21% Solvon K4 Liquid CO2 Liquid silicone Wet cleaning (water) Glycol ethers 1-bromopropane (!) Source: LHWMP, 2011

  5. PERC = DNAPL PERC Adapted from: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Adapted from: Science Education Resource Center at Carleton College.

  6. Redmond, WA Groundwater2006-2010

  7. Redmond, WA - 2011 259 x 0.57 = 148 ppm

  8. Redmond, WA - 2011 > 1000 ppm PERC (maxed out!)

  9. Age of dry cleaning machines Expected lifespan ? <1 Source: LHWMP, 2011

  10. ~36,000 current dry cleaning facilities in the U.S. • ~75% contaminated with PERC • Median cleanup cost: $230,000 • Range: $29,000 - $2,000,000 Source: SCRD Drycleaner Site Profiles database, April 29, 2014

  11. King County, WA: • ~200 dry cleaners • ~140 using PERC • ~50 dry cleaners on Ecology’s Confirmed & Suspected Contaminated Sites List

  12. Cleanup Alternatives: 1—$11,327,000 2—$10,260,000 3—$16,822,000 Troy LaundrySeattle

  13. PERC Harms People! • 2014 EPA review (verified by NAS): • likely to be carcinogenic to humans • toxic to the CNS, kidney, liver, immune system, and hematologic system. • adverse effects on embryonic development and reproduction. • Grandjean & Landrigan (2014): • PERC is a developmental neurotoxicant • Meta-Analysis of Dry-Cleaning-Worker Studies: • increased risk of bladder cancer in dry cleaners Guyton et al. (2014). Environ Health Perspect; DOI:10.1289/ehp.1307359 Grandjean& Landrigan (2014). The Lancet Neurology, 13(3), 330-338. Vlaanderen et al. (2014). Environ Health Perspect; DOI:10.1289/ehp.1307055

  14. PERC Kills Fish! LC50 = 5 mg/L • Juvenile rainbow trout LC50: • WA Dangerous Waste @ 100 mg/L • WA Extremely Hazardous Waste @ 10 mg/L Source: EPA ECOTOX database

  15. A PERCfect Storm • Cultural and language barriers • Lack of knowledge of health effects • Incorrect information from vendors • Little interaction with OSHA • Confusion about waste management • Changing regulatory requirements • Economically-challenged industry

  16. What is LHWMP doing? • Technical assistance & EnviroStars certification • Research into alternatives • Interagency Resource for Achieving Cooperation (IRAC): education/outreach • “Mega vouchers” to replace equipment • Three $20K awards in 2013 • Four $15K awards in 2014 • Substantial Improvement Reimbursements: $500 - $2500 • Regular vouchers - up to $500 for 50% of costs

  17. What else could be done? • Goals: • Reduce exposure/health disparities • Minimize impacts on struggling businesses • Multi-agency public/private strategy: • Incentivize conversion from PERC • Private and public financial incentives • Regulatory flexibility • Culturally appropriate technical guidance • Rigorous safer alternatives assessment

  18. www.lhwmp.org/home/Health/drycleaners.aspx

  19. Acknowledgements • LHWMP interns: • - ChantrelleJohanson • - Cody Cullison • - Jessie Taylor • City of Redmond: • - Amanda Balzer • LHWMP staff: • Alice Chapman • Trevor Fernandes • Ryan Kellogg • Debra Oliver • Sharon Schoenfeld-Cohen • Laurel Tomchick • Linda van Hooser

  20. Greenwashing? No more 5-star EnviroStar PERC users “It is very frustrating to see PERC dry cleaners promoting their 5 star EnviroStar status, it confuses customers into thinking PERC is environmentally friendly… I am frustrated that I paid a premium to build a "true" PERC free business and there is no support to promote our efforts.”

More Related