Shell and pairing gaps from mass measurements experiment
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 32

Shell and pairing gaps from mass measurements: experiment PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 52 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Shell and pairing gaps from mass measurements: experiment. Magdalena Kowalska CERN, ISOLDE. Masses and nuclear structure. Atomic masses and nuclear binding energy show the net effect of all forces inside the nucleus

Download Presentation

Shell and pairing gaps from mass measurements: experiment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Shell and pairing gaps from mass measurements experiment

Shell and pairing gaps from mass measurements: experiment

Magdalena Kowalska

CERN, ISOLDE


Masses and nuclear structure

Masses and nuclear structure

  • Atomic masses and nuclear binding energy show the net effect of all forces inside the nucleus

  • Mass filters (i.e. various mass differences) “enhance” specific effects, compared to others

  • Best comparison to nuclear structure models: use models to calculate mass differences (i.e. compare the observables)

    • Easier in mean-field models than in shell model

  • Problems start when comparing to non-observables


Shell gaps

Shell gaps

fp-shell

28

20

sd-shell

8

p-shell

2

s-shell

  • Observable:

    • Two-nucleon separation energy; how strongly bound are the 2 additional neutrons (protons)

    • “empirical shell gap”: Difference in two-nucleon separation energy

  • “indirect observable”: (single-particle) shell gap

  • Assumptions

    • Single-particle picture: no correlations

    • No rearrangement when adding the additional nucleons

    • In practice: small correlations (thus little deformation)


Pairing gaps

Pairing gaps

  • Observable

    • odd-even staggering in binding energy

    • 3-, 4-, or 5-point mass-difference formula

  • “indirect observable” – pairing gap

  • Assumptions

    • No rearrangement (polarization)

    • The same shell filled


Binding energy

Binding energy

  • Net effect of all forces

    • Parabolic behaviour

    • Odd-even staggering

    • Discontinuity at magic numbers

N


Separation energy

Separation energy

  • First mass derivative

    • Steady decrease (almost linear)

    • Odd-even staggering (larger for even-Z)

    • Larger decrease at magic numbers

N


2 nucleon separation energy

2-nucleon separation energy

  • Close-to-linear decrease

  • No odd-even staggering

  • Larger decrease at magic numbers

N


3 point mass difference

3-point mass difference

  • Second mass derivative

    • Linear trend taken away

    • Showing the size of odd-even staggering (larger for even-Z)

    • Small residual odd-even staggering

    • Larger at magic numbers

N


4 point mass difference

4-point mass difference

  • Second mass derivative

    • Linear trend taken away

    • Showing the size of odd-even staggering (larger for even-Z)

    • No residual odd-even staggering

    • Larger at magic numbers

N


Two proton separation energy

Two-proton separation energy

Z=28

Z=50

Decrease for smaller N

Z=82

N


Two neutron separation energy

Two-neutron separation energy

N=20

N=50

N=82

N=126

Z


Two neutron separation energy1

Two-neutron separation energy

N


S 2n zoom1

S2n – zoom1

N


S 2n zoom11

S2n– zoom1

N=20

N=50

N=28

N=82

Decrease for smaller Z

Z


Shell gap zoom1

Shell gap-zoom1

DS2N/2 [keV]

1/2 x Empirical shell gap

DS2N/2:

1/2 x S2N(Z,N)-S2N(Z,N+2)]


S2n zoom2

S2n – zoom2

N


Shell and pairing gaps from mass measurements experiment

Shell gap-zoom2

DS2N/2 [keV]


Empirical shell gaps

Empirical shell gaps

  • D(S2n)/2 [keV]

Decrease for smaller Z

Z


Example ca

Example: Ca

Binding energy


Separation energy1

Separation energy

x

Pairing energy


Pairing gap

Pairing gap

D(3)

Example:

  • Neutron pairing gap in Ca

For even N – shell effects visible

D(4)

D3(N) = B(N-1)-2B(N)+B(N+1)

D4(N) = B(N-2)-3B(N-1)+3B(N)-B(N+1)

Smoother than D3, but

Centred at N+1/2 or N-1/2


N 40 and 68ni region

N=40 and 68Ni region

From S. Naimi et al, Phys. Rev. C 86, 014325 (2012)

Theory: M. Bender, G. F. Bertsch, and P.-H. Heenen, Phys. Rev. C 78, 054312 (2008).


Shell gap at n 50

Shell gap at N=50

  • Empirical shell gap

Decrease for smaller Z

Decrease also in spherical mean-filed -> shell gap indeed decreases

Theory: M. Bender, G. F. Bertsch, and P.-H. Heenen,

Phys. Rev. C 78, 054312 (2008).


Shell gap at z 50

Shell gap at Z=50

  • Empirical shell gap

Decrease for smaller Z

No decrease in spherical mean-filed -> shell gap doesn’t decrease; experimental value changes due to correlations

Theory: M. Bender, G. F. Bertsch, and P.-H. Heenen,

Phys. Rev. C 78, 054312 (2008).


N pairing gap for odd and even z

N-pairing gap for odd and even Z

Pairing gap difference: can we call it p-n pairing?

even-Z

even-Z

p-n interaction?

odd-Z

odd-Z


Summary

Summary

  • Mass differences can be used to obtain empirical

    • shell gaps – 2-nucleon separation energies

    • pairing gaps – odd-even mass staggering

  • To give them quantitative value, other effects should be small in a given region:

    • Shells: small deformations

    • Pairing: the same shell filled, similar deformation

  • Comparison to theoretical models:

    • Safest: compare to theoretical mass differences

    • Problems start when interpreting the values as shell or pairing gaps

  • Open questions mainly for pairing

    • Which formula to use?

    • What about p-n interaction?


Shell and pairing gaps from mass measurements experiment

S. Naimi, ISOLTRAP PhD thesis 2010


  • Login