1 / 19

Differences in neurocognitive functioning in early and late onset alcohol dependent inpatients.

Differences in neurocognitive functioning in early and late onset alcohol dependent inpatients. Leen Joos, MSc CAPRI - Antwerp Psychiatrisch Centrum Broeders Alexianen – Boechout. Introduction. EARLY Onset Alcohol dependent patients (EOA). vs. LATE Onset Alcohol dependent patients (LOA).

aelsie
Download Presentation

Differences in neurocognitive functioning in early and late onset alcohol dependent inpatients.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Differences in neurocognitive functioning in early and late onset alcohol dependent inpatients. Leen Joos, MSc CAPRI - Antwerp Psychiatrisch Centrum Broeders Alexianen – Boechout

  2. Introduction EARLY Onset Alcohol dependent patients (EOA) vs. LATE Onset Alcohol dependent patients (LOA)

  3. Introduction Clinical and demographic differences EOA: younger more paternal family history of alcohol abuse more traumatic experiences more antisocial traits worse prognosis higher severity of alcohol dependence more craving more other drug use besides alcohol longer alcohol & substance-abusing career higher trait impulsivity higher sensation seeking and aggression weak impulse control Demir e.a., 2002; Dom e.a., 2006, 2007; Evren e.a., 2009; Johnson e.a., 2000

  4. Introduction Clinical and demographic differences EOA: younger more paternal family history of alcohol abuse more traumatic experiences more antisocial traits worse prognosis higher severity of alcohol dependence more craving more other drug use besides alcohol longer alcohol & substance-abusing career higher trait impulsivity higher sensation seeking and agression weak impulse control

  5. Introduction Neuropsychological differences EOA:less cognitive flexibility (Demir e.a., 2002) more commission errors (Continuous Perf Task) ~ impulsive action (Bjork e.a., 2004) steeper discount rates (Delay Discounting Task) ~ impulsive choice (Dom e.a., 2006)

  6. Introduction EOA: highly impulsive (impulsive choice and action) less cognitive flexibility BUT: • previous research is limited • sample sizes are small • tasks are mainly focused on impulse control Hypothesis: EOA show more deficits than LOA on tasks measuring neuropsychological functioning.

  7. Method Subjects 92 alcohol dependent inpatients: EOA: n=35 (age of onset ≤ 25 years) LOA: n=57 (age of onset > 25 years) INCLUSION criteria: - Current (past 12 months) alcohol dependence (DMS-IV) - Abstinent EXCLUSION criteria: - Use of psychoactive medication - Current (past 12 months) dependence on other drugs besides alcohol - Acute psychic or severe somatic disorders

  8. Method Subjects *p<.05; **p<.01; ***p<.001

  9. Method Measures Questionnaires • DSM-IV personality disorders (ADP-IV) • Trait impulsivity (BIS-11) • Trait anxiety (STAI) • Depression (BDI-II) • ADHD (ASRS) • Quantity/frequency measures of alcohol use, past 6 months (TLFB) • Craving (OCDS) • Nicotine dependence (FTND)

  10. Method Measures Neuropsychological tests (1/2) 1. Short-term memory / Working memory Digit span (WAIS-III; Swets Test Publishers, 2000) Pattern Recognition Memory (PRM; CANTAB; www.camcog.com) Delayed Matching to Sample (DMS; CANTAB; www.camcog.com) 2. Attention Rapid Visual Presentation Task (RVP; CANTAB; www.camcog.com) 3. Planning Tower of London (TOL; Vandenheuvel e.a., 2003)

  11. Method Measures Neuropsychological tests (2/2) 4. Response inhibition Stop Signal Task (SST; Eagle e.a., 2008) Stroop Colour-Word Task (Cox e.a., 2006) 5. Decision making Delay Discounting Task (DDT; Wittmann e.a., 2007) 6. Reflection impulsivity Information Sampling Task (IST; Clark e.a., 2006)

  12. Results Clinical characteristics *p<.05; **p<.01; ***p<.001

  13. Results Characteristics Alcohol Use *p<.05; **p<.01; ***p<.001

  14. Results 1. Short-term memory / Working memory EOA perform BETTER than LOA on: Delayed recognition memory (PRM): p<.05 Delayed visual memory (DMS): p<.05 Working memory (DMS): p=.062 No sign differences on Digit Span 2. Attention No sign differences on RVP 3. Planning EOA perform BETTER than LOA on TOL (p<.05) Difficult trials - step 4-5-6: p<.05 Easy trials - step 2-3: ns

  15. Results 4. Response inhibition No sign differences on SST or Stroop Task 5. Decision making No sign differences on DDT 6. Reflection impulsivity EOA showed a MORE IMPULSIVE response pattern than LOA (IST): p<.05 e.g. they gathered LESS information in more risky situations

  16. Summary EOA act MORE IMPULSIVE than LOA in risky situations involving rewards and losses EOA perform BETTER than LOA on tasks measuring Delayed Recognition Memory Delayed Visual Memory Planning

  17. Discussion Medication free & Pure alcohol dependent Sample selection? • Previous results were biased 2. Our sample: less comorbidity less drug dependence

  18. Discussion Differences between EOA and LOA on neurocognitive measures are less pronounced. Less comorbidity: 1. 2. Good cognitive abilities are a protective factor for EOA NOT to go into poly-substance dependence

  19. Thanks for your attention! Questions? Leen.joos@ua.ac.be

More Related