1 / 5

Internet War Room

Internet War Room. Wenke Lee, Nick Feamster, David Dagon, Mustaque Ahamad. Need. How many in CS know: GTISC/NTG already have 4 joint projects together on large-scale network (Internet) monitoring NSF CyberTrust Large Team (CLEANSE) DARPA SMITE (via BBN) DHS Botnet Monitoring

ady
Download Presentation

Internet War Room

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Internet War Room Wenke Lee, Nick Feamster, David Dagon, Mustaque Ahamad

  2. Need • How many in CS know: GTISC/NTG already have 4 joint projects together on large-scale network (Internet) monitoring • NSF CyberTrust Large Team (CLEANSE) • DARPA SMITE (via BBN) • DHS Botnet Monitoring • NSF Computing Research Infrastructure • Need • Shared workspace area for joint projects in networking and security • Showcase for ongoing work and research results

  3. Approach: Internet War Room • A common, shared, and workbench-like environment for faculty, staff, students, and guests • Work area for students across areas to meet • Theme/project/problem-focused work area(vs. group-based) • Outward-facing “eye candy” to showcase research activity and results • Glass wall to racks of machines • Flat-panel displays that highlight various activities under study, results, etc. (real-time monitoring, IP heatmaps of spam and botnet activity) • Real-time analysis and data feeds that could be exported to the Web (including CS home page) • An integral part of the larger and more ambitious effort in creating an “internet security institute”

  4. Benefits • Easier collaboration across groups • Easy, direct access to machines, racks, etc. for experimentation • Promote our research excellence • Internal exposure • Example to other research groups for running large, cross-disciplinary effort • Add “cool” image to CS research (like what IC has been doing) • External exposure • Recruiting: potential faculty/student applicants, etc. • Show off to visitors from peer institutions • Report/demo to funding agencies • Industry: partnership and donation • Other potential collaborators

  5. Competition • Other universities with similar strengths may try to start a similar effort/institute • CAIDA/UCSD (Savage, Claffy)

More Related