1 / 37

DILEPTON TRIGGERS for SUSY SEARCHES @ CDF

DILEPTON TRIGGERS for SUSY SEARCHES @ CDF. Melisa Rossi Università degli Studi di Udine & INFN. Outline. Physics Motivation What is the Standard Model? What is SUSY? SUSY Lepton-based signatures Tevatron Collider & CDF Detector CDF Trigger System SUSY DILEPTON Trigger Strategy

Download Presentation

DILEPTON TRIGGERS for SUSY SEARCHES @ CDF

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DILEPTON TRIGGERS for SUSY SEARCHES @ CDF Melisa Rossi Università degli Studi di Udine & INFN

  2. Outline • Physics Motivation • What is the Standard Model? • What is SUSY? • SUSY Lepton-based signatures • Tevatron Collider & CDF Detector • CDF Trigger System • SUSY DILEPTON Trigger • Strategy • Structure • Trigger Monitoring • Monitoring variable • Good run list • Trigger studies • Conclusions

  3. What is the Standard Model ? An effective low energy theory that • describes matter and its interactions • combines Strong, Weak and Electromagnetic interactions • Very successful at describing data • Still unanswered questions • Where does mass comes from? • What about gravity? • What is the dark matter origin? ▬▬► Beyond the Standard Model

  4. Fermions Leptons Quarks ---------------------- Gluon ---------------------- Gauge Bosons Photon W,Z Higgs Sfermions Sleptons Squarks -------------------- Gluino -------------------- Gauginos Neutralinos Charginos What is SUSY • Possible extension of the Standard Model • Additional symmetry between fermions and bosons SM fermion field  supersymmetric boson field SM boson field  supersymmetric fermion field • Particle spectrum more than doubles

  5. What is SUSY • If SUSY was an exact symmetry • SM particle mass = corresponding superpartner mass • Clearly not realistic • No sparticles have been observed so far • Hence supersymmetry must be broken • The simplest realistic supersymmetric field theory is MSSM • Satisfies all phenomenological constraints • Depends on more than 100 parameters • Models to reduce the number of free parameters in SUSY • cMSSM, mSUGRA... • Different points in the SUSY parameter space lead to different phenomenology

  6. What is SUSY • SUSY introduces a new quantum number • R-parity: 1 for particle, -1 for sparticle • In many models R-parity is conserved • sparticles are producted in pair • Lighest superparticle is stable (LSP) • LSP behaves like a heavy neutrino • Not detectable: carrying away some energy and momentum • SUSY processes result in final states with LPS • SUSY events characterized by missing energy

  7. What is SUSY ASSUMING SUSY • LSP is an excellent candidate for cold dark matter • Coupling constants can unify at GUT scale

  8. SUSY Lepton-based Signatures • Trilepton-based • mSUGRA prediction at reach • Like-sign dileptons • Release third lepton request • Increase acceptance • LS requirement for background rejection Chargino-neutralino associated production

  9. m0 = 100 GeV, m1/2 = 180 GeV, A0 =0, tanβ=3, sgn>0 SUSY Lepton-based Signatures • Signatures characterized by • Multiple leptons • relatively low pT (<20GeV/c2) • Missing Et from multiple sources • Moderate missing Et (need full understanding of the detector) • Lepton-based Signatures very clean. This is particularly useful at hadron collider where QCD background is large.

  10. CDF D0 Tevatron Main injector & recycler Tevatron Collider • RunI (1992-1996) • ppbar √s = 1.8 TeV • luminosity peak ~1.5E31cm-2s-1 • 6x6 bunches • bunch crossing every 3.5μs • RunII (since 2001) • ppbar √s = 1.96 TeV • luminosity peak ~1E32cm-2s-1 • 36x36 bunches • bunch crossing every 396ns 6.3 km ring for a proton-antiproton collider with 980 Gev/beam

  11. Tevatron Luminosity Excellent performance in 2004 for RunII • 500 pb-1 delivered • 350 pb-1 on tape • 250 pb-1 analyzed (100pb-1 in RunI) • 4-8 fb-1 by 2009 Plan for~1.5E32cm–2s–1 luminosity peak by the end of 2005

  12. The CDF Detector • Retained from RunI • central and endwall calorimeter • central muon system • solenoid New in RunII • tracking system • central outer tracker (COT) • silicon vertex detector (SVX+ISL) • Endplug calorimeter • Muon system upgrade • Front-end electronics • DAQ/Trigger system

  13. Path 2 Path 1 L1 trigger L1 trigger L2 trigger L2 trigger L3 trigger L3 trigger Dataset CDF Trigger System • Trigger • combines information from all subdetectors (tracking, calorimeter, muon chambers...) • takes online decision to keep or reject events • CDF Technical constrains • Rate limits • CDF developed • 3 level trigger system • organized in • Path = unique combination of L1,L2,L3 • Dataset = combination of paths

  14. CDF Detector 7.6 million events/sec L1 pipeline 5.5μs 50kHz L2 decision 20μs 300Hz L3 decision 600ms 75Hz OFFLINE CDF Trigger System • Accept rates are 10x higher than RunI • L1+L2 rejection factor is 20000:1 • The trigger budget is balanced between all the physics groups (bandwidth distribution) @1E32cm–2s–1 Rate = Inst. Lumi. x cross section

  15. CDF Trigger System • Level 1 information • Calorimeter • trigger towers Δη x Δφ = 0.2 x 15 • Global trigger: missing Et, SumEt • Tracking (eXtremelyFastTracker) • Efficiency> 96% for pT>1.5GeV/c • Muon = 2D track matched to stub • Stub = cluster of hits in muon chamber • Electron = 2D track matched to trigger tower • Level 2 information • Calorimeter clustering algorithm • Identify seed towers • Identify shoulder towers • Silicon vertex tracker • To identify displaced tracks • Impact parameter resolution 35μm • Muon boards • New L2 code in 2004 • Level 3 information • Offline-like reconstruction

  16. SUSY DILEPTON Trigger • SUSY Lepton-based signals • low pt multilepton final states • Ideal choice would be an inclusive lepton trigger • CDF opted for a multipath DILEPTON trigger • To fit with bandwidth available resources • To achieve the maximum acceptance/efficiency  The SUSY DILEPTON Dataset

  17. SUSY DILEPTON Trigger Lepton types involved in the trigger • CEM4 central electron with 4GeV/c pt • CEM8 central electron with 8GeV/c pt • PEM8 forward electron with 8GeV/c et • CMU4 muon with 4GeV/c pt (η<0.6) • CMUP4 muon with 4GeV/c pt (η<0.6) • CMX4 muon with 4GeV/c pt (0.6<η<1)

  18. SUSY DILEPTON Trigger • Lepton types combined in 20 trigger paths • CEM4_CMU4 • CEM4_CMUP4 • CEM4_CMX4 • CEM4_PEM8 • CMU4_PEM8 • CMUP4_PEM8 • CEM4_CEM4 • .......

  19. SUSY DILEPTON Trigger Trigger issues are • Monitoring generally a study for each path, • Calibration complex with a multipath structure!! • We followed a new strategy to simplify calibration • define a lepton object for each lepton type • definitions do not depend on the specific path • compute efficiency for each lepton object • combine lepton objects into trigger paths

  20. SUSY DILEPTON Trigger lepton object = standard single lepton definition @ trigger level 20 trigger paths 6 lepton objects electrons muons

  21. SUSY DILEPTON Trigger • SUSY Trigger organized in 3 categories • A : baseline paths • Ask for 2 leptons of 4GeV/c pt at L1, L2, L3 • B : complementary paths • Ask for 1 lepton + an additional track of 8 GeV/c pt at L1 and L2 • To recover stub/cluster inefficiency • C : complementary paths • Ask for 1 lepton of 12 GeV/c pt at L1 and L2 • To increase the acceptance • All paths contribute to the acceptance

  22. SUSY DILEPTON Trigger • Trigger cross section: • L2 700 nb • L3 80 nb @7.5E32cm–2s–1

  23. Trigger Monitoring • Monitoring the performance of a trigger is important • to check the quality of the collected events • to verify the stability in time of the trigger response • to keep track of trigger changes • Need of a suitable Monitoring Variable

  24. Trigger Monitoring • Monitoring Approach • Consider events collected by each of the trigger path • Verify which leptons are reconstructed @ offline level For each trigger path Trigger level Offline level 2 lepton objects found 2 leptons reconstructed

  25. Trigger Monitoring • Each DILEPTON Trigger path requires • lepton1 & lepton2 @ trigger level • For each trigger path: • D1 = number of collected events • N1 = number of collected events with lepton 1 reconstructed offline and same quantities for lepton 2

  26. Trigger Monitoring • Monitoring Variable: R • It separate information about lepton1 and lepton 2 • It is a sort of purity • 0 < R < 1 • higher R  higher quality of the collected events • In ideal conditions R = 1 • It is expected to be stable in time • We have several R values for each lepton type • expect no significant differences between different trigger paths R1 = N1/D1 R2 = N2/D2

  27. Trigger Monitoring R distribution vs. Time (run) for CEM4 PATH:CEM4_PEM8 PATH:CEM4_CMUP4 ► R is locally stable in time ► Steps in distribution correlated to trigger changes ► changes increase R value higher quality ► similar absolute R values for a given lepton type

  28. SUSY TRIGGER Monitoring • R behaves as expected • We can use it as discriminator for a good/bad run • For each lepton object we define a suspect run • Test for R indipendence of trigger path • Test for R stability in time

  29. 1 R Rlepton run SUSY TRIGGER Monitoring • Supect run definition for each lepton object • R indipendence of trigger path • R = value for each trigger path • Rlepton= average value for each run • The run is suspect if |R-Rlepton| > 10σ • R stability • <Rlepton> = Rlepton local average over 20 runs • The run is suspect if |Rlepton-<Rlepton>| > 5σ 1 2 2 run1 run2 run3

  30. SUSY TRIGGER Monitoring total suspect luminosity 37pb-1 out of 380 pb-1 considered Suspect run luminosity for lepton object Rlepton stability CEM4

  31. Growth terms Constant σ Constant rate SUSY DILEPTON Trigger Studies • CDF is facing high luminosity scenarios • trigger cross sections depend on luminosity • possible growth factor @ high luminosity • For any process rate R = L σ • For a physics process σ independent of L • For trigger cross sections, observe: σ = A / L + B + C L + D L2 Growth factor in trigger cross section

  32. SUSY DILEPTON Trigger Studies • For SUSY DILEPTON Trigger • Possible large growth factor @ L2 • In particular for complementary paths • We performed a L2 Study • Total and exclusive cross section behaviour with luminosity • High-pt inclusive muon: L2_CMUP6_PT8 • High-pt inclusive electron: L2_CEM12_PT8 • Medium-pt electron+track: L2_CEM8_PT8_CES3_&_TRK8 exclusive cross section = effective cross section @ L2 w.r.t. the whole CDF trigger

  33. L2_CMUP6_PT8 L2_CEM8_PT8_CES3_&_TRK8 σTOT σTOT σEX σEX • Inclusive muon: • No major growth factor • Used by variety of physics group (not only exotic) • Electron+track: • σTOT rises with L • Adds very little to global L2 bandwidth L2 X-SECTIONS (nb) vs. L (cm-2s-1)

  34. L2_CEM12_PT8 σTOT σEX L2 X-SECTIONS (nb) vs. L (cm-2s-1) • Inclusive electron: • No growth factor in σtot • σEX≤ 100nb

  35. Summary -1- • Physics motivation for SUSY • multiple leptons final states • DILEPTON Trigger for SUSY @ CDF • Complex Multipath trigger structure • New strategy • Standard lepton object definition • To simplify calibration and monitoring

  36. Summary -2- • SUSY DILEPTON Trigger Monitoring • Variable choice: R • gives information about event quality • behaves as expected • locally stable in time • steps correlated to trigger changes • Good run list per lepton object done • 37pb of suspect luminosity (10% of the total) • Ready for Trigger Calibration

  37. Summary -3- • SUSY DILEPTON trigger up to shutdown ’04 • Complementary paths are healthy • No appreciable growth factors • Small effective cross sections • CDF should be ready for 1.5E32cm-2s-1 • the whole CDF trigger will be revised • need to re-think also the SUSY trigger for 2005 fall

More Related