deductive logic
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Deductive logic

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 23

Deductive logic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 93 Views
  • Uploaded on

You do not reason a man out something that he was not reasoned into. All generalizations are false, including this one. Deductive logic. What is it? How does it work? Why does it matter?. Critical reason is the only alternative to violence so far discovered.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Deductive logic' - adriel


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
deductive logic

You do not reason a man out something that he was not reasoned into

All generalizations are false, including this one

Deductive logic

What is it?

How does it work?

Why does it matter?

Critical reason is the only alternative to violence so far discovered.

Logic is the beginning of wisdom, not the end

an example
An example..

Sherlock Holmes (the master of deductive logic) speaking

to a police officer about the theft of an expensive racehorse…

Police Officer: “Holmes, does any one aspect of the crime strike you as significant?”

Holmes: “Yes, the curious incident of the dog in the night time”

Police Officer: “But the dog did nothing in the night time!”

Holmes: “That was the curious incident!”

the deductive reasoning
The deductive reasoning..

Watchdogs bark at strangers

The Watchdog did not bark at the thief

Therefore the thief was not a stranger

more examples
More examples..
  • You know that you left your mobile phone either in your pocket or on your desk
  • Your mobile isn’t in your pocket
  • Therefore it must be on your desk
slide5

You know that The West Lake in Hangzhou is a fresh water lake

  • You know that sharks cannot live in fresh water
  • Therefore there cannot be any sharks in the West Lake
the benefits
The benefits?
  • You don’t have to check every single fresh water lake to know that there aren’t any sharks in it: deductive logic tells you that there are no sharks in any freshwater lakes.
so what is deductive reasoning
So what is deductive reasoning?
  • Any form of reasoning that moves from the general to the particular e.g.
  • “All dogs are mammals
  • Fido is a dog
  • Therefore Fido….

Is a mammal

syllogisms
Syllogisms
  • The kind of deductive argument that we just looked at is known as a syllogism
  • A syllogism consists of:
        • Two premises and a conclusion
        • Three terms, each of which occurs twice (dogs, mammals, fido)
        • Quantifiers such as ‘all, some or no’
truth vs valid which is this
Truth Vs Valid – which is this?
  • All rocket scientists are stupid
  • Bill Gates is a rocket scientist
  • Therefore Bill Gates is stupid
it is valid
It is Valid!
  • Both the PREMISES are false
  • The CONCLUSION is false
  • Yet the ARGUMENT ITSELF IS VALID!
what about this one
WHAT ABOUT THIS ONE..
  • All tacos are teachers
  • Mr. Wright is a taco
  • Therefore Mr. Wright is a Teacher
valid
Valid
  • Both the premises are false
  • But the conclusion is true
  • However the argument is still VALID
this one
This one?...
  • All projectors require electricity
  • This classroom has a projector
  • Therefore this this classroom does not have a projector
invalid
INVALID
  • The premises are both true
  • The conclusion is false
  • This is the one combination where the argument MUST be invalid
diy make your own valid syllogisms
DIY – make your own valid syllogisms
  • Two true premises and a true conclusion
  • One true premise, one false premise and a true conclusion
  • One true premise, one false premise and a false conclusion
  • Two false premises and a true conclusion
  • Two false premises and a false conclusion
pure logic
Pure logic
  • Concerned merely with the structure of arguments, it doesn’t matter if the premises are false, or even meaningless!
  • All that matters is does the conclusion follow logically from the premises.
  • E.g. :
    • All blims are blams
    • Some blims are bloms
    • Therefore some blams are bloms
aghhhh my head hurts algebra in tok
Aghhhh – my head hurts! Algebra in TOK!
  • All A’s are B’s
  • Some A’s are C’s
  • Therefore some B’s are C’s
what s the point
What’s the point?
  • Removes ‘belief bias’
  • Sometimes we tend to believe an argument is valid because we already agree with the conclusion
  • E.g. Democrats are in favour of free speech
  • Dictators are not Democrats
  • Therefore all dictators are opposed to free speech
  • This is NOT a valid argument
using venn diagrams
Using Venn diagrams
  • Refer to the photocopied information… Venn diagrams can be useful way of picturing a Syllogism and determining whether an argument if valid
enthymeme s
Enthymeme’s
  • Incomplete arguments that exclude a premise because it is considered obvious/assumed.
supply the missing premise for these enthymemes
Supply the missing premise for these enthymemes
  • Jenny goes to Oxford University, so she must be very intelligent
  • Drugs should be legalised because they only harm the addict
  • Graham is a politician, so he is probably lying.
  • Cheerleading should be an olympic event becauses cheerleaders compete, train and have a high level of physical fitness
  • Since it is natural to eat meat, there is nothing morally wrong with it
but where do our premises come from
But where do our premises come from?
  • INDUCTIVE REASONING…!
  • To be continued….
bibliography
Bibliography
  • Much of this presentation is shamelessly based upon material from the excellent TOK book by Richard van de Lagemaat – thanks go to him!
ad