1 / 23

# Deductive logic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

You do not reason a man out something that he was not reasoned into. All generalizations are false, including this one. Deductive logic. What is it? How does it work? Why does it matter?. Critical reason is the only alternative to violence so far discovered.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

All generalizations are false, including this one

### Deductive logic

What is it?

How does it work?

Why does it matter?

Critical reason is the only alternative to violence so far discovered.

Logic is the beginning of wisdom, not the end

An example.. reasoned into

Sherlock Holmes (the master of deductive logic) speaking

to a police officer about the theft of an expensive racehorse…

Police Officer: “Holmes, does any one aspect of the crime strike you as significant?”

Holmes: “Yes, the curious incident of the dog in the night time”

Police Officer: “But the dog did nothing in the night time!”

Holmes: “That was the curious incident!”

The deductive reasoning.. reasoned into

Watchdogs bark at strangers

The Watchdog did not bark at the thief

Therefore the thief was not a stranger

More examples.. reasoned into

• You know that you left your mobile phone either in your pocket or on your desk

• Therefore it must be on your desk

The benefits? lake

• You don’t have to check every single fresh water lake to know that there aren’t any sharks in it: deductive logic tells you that there are no sharks in any freshwater lakes.

• Any form of reasoning that moves from the general to the particular e.g.

• “All dogs are mammals

• Fido is a dog

• Therefore Fido….

Is a mammal

Syllogisms lake

• The kind of deductive argument that we just looked at is known as a syllogism

• A syllogism consists of:

• Two premises and a conclusion

• Three terms, each of which occurs twice (dogs, mammals, fido)

• Quantifiers such as ‘all, some or no’

• All rocket scientists are stupid

• Bill Gates is a rocket scientist

• Therefore Bill Gates is stupid

It is Valid! lake

• Both the PREMISES are false

• The CONCLUSION is false

• Yet the ARGUMENT ITSELF IS VALID!

• All tacos are teachers

• Mr. Wright is a taco

• Therefore Mr. Wright is a Teacher

Valid lake

• Both the premises are false

• But the conclusion is true

• However the argument is still VALID

This one?... lake

• All projectors require electricity

• This classroom has a projector

• Therefore this this classroom does not have a projector

INVALID lake

• The premises are both true

• The conclusion is false

• This is the one combination where the argument MUST be invalid

• Two true premises and a true conclusion

• One true premise, one false premise and a true conclusion

• One true premise, one false premise and a false conclusion

• Two false premises and a true conclusion

• Two false premises and a false conclusion

Pure logic lake

• Concerned merely with the structure of arguments, it doesn’t matter if the premises are false, or even meaningless!

• All that matters is does the conclusion follow logically from the premises.

• E.g. :

• All blims are blams

• Some blims are bloms

• Therefore some blams are bloms

Aghhhh lake – my head hurts! Algebra in TOK!

• All A’s are B’s

• Some A’s are C’s

• Therefore some B’s are C’s

• Removes ‘belief bias’

• Sometimes we tend to believe an argument is valid because we already agree with the conclusion

• E.g. Democrats are in favour of free speech

• Dictators are not Democrats

• Therefore all dictators are opposed to free speech

• This is NOT a valid argument

• Refer to the photocopied information… Venn diagrams can be useful way of picturing a Syllogism and determining whether an argument if valid

Enthymeme’s lake

• Incomplete arguments that exclude a premise because it is considered obvious/assumed.

• Jenny goes to Oxford University, so she must be very intelligent

• Drugs should be legalised because they only harm the addict

• Graham is a politician, so he is probably lying.

• Cheerleading should be an olympic event becauses cheerleaders compete, train and have a high level of physical fitness

• Since it is natural to eat meat, there is nothing morally wrong with it

• INDUCTIVE REASONING…!

• To be continued….

Bibliography lake

• Much of this presentation is shamelessly based upon material from the excellent TOK book by Richard van de Lagemaat – thanks go to him!