1 / 9

The University of Texas System Federated Identity Management Initiative

The University of Texas System Federated Identity Management Initiative. Paul Caskey Technology Architect pcaskey@utsystem.edu June 21, 2007. https://idm.utsystem.edu/downloads/APAN-UTsys-June07.ppt. Where we are. Who we are. Who we are (cont). Nine academic universities

Download Presentation

The University of Texas System Federated Identity Management Initiative

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The University of Texas SystemFederated Identity Management Initiative Paul Caskey Technology Architect pcaskey@utsystem.edu June 21, 2007 https://idm.utsystem.edu/downloads/APAN-UTsys-June07.ppt

  2. Where we are

  3. Who we are

  4. Who we are (cont) • Nine academic universities • Six health institutions • $10 Billion Operating Budget (FY 2007) • $1.7 Billion in research • More than 80,000 employees • More than 190,000 students enrolled • Educates more than one-third of the state’s undergraduates • Educates nearly three-fourths of the state’s health professionals

  5. A Chronology of IdM in the U.T. System… • Impetus • Need to collaborate • Regulations / Security • Statement of Direction “…deployment of a robust, secure, interoperable infrastructure for identity management in support of inter-institutional collaboration is a strategic goal. ” • Vision Statement “All University of Texas students, faculty, and staff are able to access both local and remote resources using their local credentials and attributes, through a seamless technology infrastructure.” • NMI “Extending the Reach” Grant • Shibb-fest / Pilot federation • 7 IdPs initially • All 16 within 2 years • Started with low-risk apps

  6. A Chronology of IdM in the U.T. System… (cont) • Policies / Governance • IdM Governing Board • MOP • FOP • Charter, Member Agreement, Attributes, Fees • Roadmap • Built around 3 main areas: Policy, Technology, Governance (https://idm.utsystem.edu/IdentityMgmtpage4.pdf) • Production • Legal agreements signed • ~10 apps • Working on audit plan

  7. Lessons Learned • Identity management is not an “I.T. problem”. • Policy and governance, done right, take considerable time. • It’s easier to sell something tangible. • It’s important to address the need for “federated support”.

  8. The Future? • New Apps / Shared Services! • Grid access • Medical Forensics • Benefits • ERP? • Apps starting to consume more attributes • AuthZ • User convenience • What attributes, what vocabulary? • LoA gaining in importance • Interfederation a real need

  9. Thank You! Paul Caskey Technology Architect pcaskey@utsystem.edu June 21, 2007 https://idm.utsystem.edu/downloads/APAN-UTsys-June07.ppt

More Related