Silviculture
Download
1 / 41

Silviculture (Forestry)??? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 199 Views
  • Uploaded on

Silviculture (Forestry)???. Traditional Forestry where timber management is based mostly on the economics of commodity extraction. Plant Seedlings. Grow Trees, Apply Fertilizers, Pesticides. REPEAT. Burn Slash. Cut Trees. Traditional Forestry.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Silviculture (Forestry)???' - adora


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Silviculture(Forestry)???

  • Traditional Forestrywhere timber management is based mostly on theeconomics of commodity extraction


Plant Seedlings

Grow Trees, Apply Fertilizers, Pesticides

REPEAT

Burn Slash

Cut Trees

Traditional Forestry


In Nepal, 40% of annual feed of buffalo is leaves, 25% for a cow.

In dry tropical forests, livestock not survive without forest grazing

Ref: Patel-Weynand & Vogt 1999

Collecting leaves for fodder (animal food), Himalayan India

-this is illegal


Significant dependence on wood for heating, cooking (~80%) a cow.

India Himalayas – cutting trees for fire wood, obviously not enough supply since this is supposed to be a forest

Sustainable use of forests???


CONVERSION FORESTS INTO AGRICULTURE: a cow. Former tropical forests now terraced palm oil plantations

Palm oil production big in Asia, right converted tropical rain forest, lower right palm oil fruit, left red colored palm oil (used in cooking)


ECOTOURISM LODGES a cow.

Palms collected for roofing especially on tourist lodgings

RESULT: Belize being over harvested and illegal collection in conservation areas


International community pushing as economic viable for indigenous communities to obtain income – non-timber forest products

Has not been shown to be viable

RESULT: OVERHARVESTING RESOURCE

Sri Lanka


Southwest Mexico – pine needles collected from forests to add to agricultural fields, nurseries as fertilizer


ECONOMICS/ add to agricultural fields, nurseries as fertilizer

GLOBAL MARKETS

FOREST PRACTICES

Sustainable Forestry

CONSERVATION

Sustainable Forestry


We have struggled with minimizing our ecological footprint on the landscape and determining our capacity to survive on a smaller land base

BIOSPHERE 2 Arizona

10


PEOPLE on the landscape and determining our capacity to survive on a smaller land base

FOOD

BIO 2, Arizona

Wildlands

TOTALLY HUMAN CONSTRUCT AND MANAGED

11


12 on the landscape and determining our capacity to survive on a smaller land base


Definitions: on the landscape and determining our capacity to survive on a smaller land base

  • clear-cutting – cutting all trees in an area, no trees left for regeneration or for habitat, biodiversity (number of different species)

  • variable retention harvesting –

    • don’t remove all trees (can be scattered evenly or clumped distribution or both),

    • maintain all species at some degree,

    • leave biological legacies

  • legacies – remnants in ecosystem that can be live or dead that are important in determining how ecosystems function and their resilience

13


Definitions: (cont’d) on the landscape and determining our capacity to survive on a smaller land base

lifeboating of species – structures or functions, such as coarse wood, that allow species to survive or persist after a major change in the system, or a landscape matrix that will allow species to survive in other locations that will then function as sources of species

fragmentation – changing landscape matrix of tree distribution to small patches that increases edges and disconnects forest areas from one another

structural enrichment – manage forests so structures required by species remain as legacies in younger systems and can provide habitat such as owls roost and nest in younger forests when a few old trees are left, focusing on obtaining the maximum growth of trees for harvesting without considering all the other services that could come from the forest does not allow for or provide for structural enrichment.

14


CLEARCUT on the landscape and determining our capacity to survive on a smaller land base

15

Photographer: Chris Schnepf, University of Idaho

http://www.forestryimages.org/browse/detail.cfm?imgnum=1174018


  • Sustainable forestry on the landscape and determining our capacity to survive on a smaller land base

  • Variable retention harvesting

  • Alternative to clear cutting

  • Manage for ecological values

  • Some biological legacies left behind (e.g., big, old, large-diameter trees)

  • Questions to ask when doing variable retention harvesting

  • What should we leave?

  • How much should we leave?

  • What spatial pattern do we want to attain?

16


  • Sustainable forestry (cont’d) on the landscape and determining our capacity to survive on a smaller land base

  • Reasons to do it

  • Lifeboat species and processes

  • Structural enrichment

  • Provide variety of habitats

  • Modeled on natural processes

  • Spotted owls can nest and roost in a non-old-growth forest IF the forest has the structural characteristics of an old-growth forest – legacies – owls respond to habitat needs

17


Green tree retention on the landscape and determining our capacity to survive on a smaller land base

Host: Douglas-fir Pseudotsuga menziesii(Mirbel) Franco Photographer:Scott Roberts, Mississippi State University

Description:H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest

Location: Oregon, US

Mature forest in back

Regenerating forest in the middle

18

http://www.invasive.org/browse/detail.cfm?imgnum=4799015


Snags on the landscape and determining our capacity to survive on a smaller land base

Woody Debris

Brown cubical rot

19

Photographer: Chris Schnepf, University of Idaho

http://www.forestryimages.org/browse/detail.cfm?imgnum (1169021, 1171003, 1171065)


Snags on the landscape and determining our capacity to survive on a smaller land base

Photographer: Chris Schnepf, University of Idaho

http://www.forestryimages.org/browse/detail.cfm?imgnum=1171066

http://www.forestryimages.org/browse/detail.cfm?imgnum=1171058

20


Huckleberry on the landscape and determining our capacity to survive on a smaller land base

http://www.forestryimages.org/browse/detail.cfm?imgnum=1172048

Photographer: Chris Schnepf, University of Idaho

http://www.forestryimages.org/browse/detail.cfm?imgnum=1172046

21


Complexity and interactions within an ecosystem on the landscape and determining our capacity to survive on a smaller land base

?


  • Forests on the landscape and determining our capacity to survive on a smaller land base

    • Past: foresters’ idea of sustainable forestry was to plant trees, grow them, cut them, burn the slash, and repeat

    • Today: foresters manage with ecological values in mind - water, recreation, aesthetics, wildlife

  • What do we want from forests today?

    • Sustainable flow of wood products

    • Recreational opportunities

    • Wildlife habitat

    • Sustainable flow of clean water

23


  • What’s in a forest? on the landscape and determining our capacity to survive on a smaller land base

    • More than just largevertebrates; also a vast number and array of small organisms (microflora)

    • Detritivores such as fungi, invertebrates, and insects extremely important to forest ecosystems because they break down organic matter – nutrients released

  • Biodiversity

    • Biodiversity can be higher in recently cut areas than in undisturbed forest, but this isn’t the entire issue

    • Must take into account the kinds of different species present and their functional roles – TYPE of biodiversity important

  • 24


    • Structure on the landscape and determining our capacity to survive on a smaller land base of the forest

      • Dead tree – snag – important for wildlife (habitat for cavity-dwellers such as bats)

      • Downed log – habitat, stream interaction, nutrient sources and nurse logs

      • Live tree – erosion control, habitat

    25


    • Complexity on the landscape and determining our capacity to survive on a smaller land base of forest ecosystems

      • Example of important relationships:

      • spotted owls feed on flying squirrels which feed on below-ground fungi

      • Tree voles – live for many generations within a single tree – eat fir needles

      • Small organisms (detritivores) extremely important – make forest ecosystems run

      • Important things in a forest: green plants, detritivores

      • Past: natural forests of PNW called “biological deserts” because not many large organisms present

      • Today: we know that many small organisms such as fungi, insects, and other types of invertebrates are very important to forest ecosystems

    26


    CLAMS on the landscape and determining our capacity to survive on a smaller land base

    To be sustainable, it is difficult to know what to manage for since we don’t have a good ‘model’ of a system to aim for and we don’t know how the parts are put together

    27


    Put in COOL WATER and on the landscape and determining our capacity to survive on a smaller land baseheat slowly

    Put in BOILING WATER

    Exp. #2 - Slowly increase heat

    Exp. #1 - Instant hot heat

    Changes in our ecosystem may be slow and not apparent. For example, FOREST HEALTH – when will you detect the problem?

    28


    Mt. St. Helens, 1980 on the landscape and determining our capacity to survive on a smaller land base

    29


    Mt. St. Helens, 1980 – surrounding landscape on the landscape and determining our capacity to survive on a smaller land base

    30


    Mt. St. Helens, 1980 – surrounding landscape on the landscape and determining our capacity to survive on a smaller land base

    31


    Mt. St. Helens, covered the surface of the ground, most soils in PNW formed from volcanic materials (tephra)

    32


    Important lessons ecologists learned soils in PNW formed from volcanic materials (tephra)from the eruption of Mt. St. Helens:

    • Cumulative Effects - combined effects across a landscape –such as clearcutting with snow or rain effects that can result in huge erosion events

    • Legacies– their role in recovery, and how, defines our structure and function needed in management

    • Fragmentation– isolated blocks of forest with lots of edges do not provide good habitat

    • Landscape ecology–need to look at collective effect of our activities and fragmentation with isolated pockets of forests not being good habitat and not something to be managed for

    33


    Important lessons ecologists learned soils in PNW formed from volcanic materials (tephra)from the eruption of Mt. St. Helens: (cont’d)

    • Educatedus about how forests respond tocatastrophes or disturbances.

      • Importance of survivors in the recovery process of the forests and this eventually is used to define what needs to be left in the forest for it to be sustainable – e.g., legacies (live or dead as logs or organic matter).

      • Made us rethink about fire’s role in systems and big storms that occur at decadal time scales and the legacies that they leave – this is important because it gets back tohow we manage for natural forest processes (mimic?).

    34


    35 soils in PNW formed from volcanic materials (tephra)

    http://outreach.forestry.oregonstate.edu/ecosystem/ppt/Puettmann.pdf


    36 soils in PNW formed from volcanic materials (tephra)

    http://outreach.forestry.oregonstate.edu/ecosystem/ppt/Puettmann.pdf


    Key findings on soils in PNW formed from volcanic materials (tephra)aesthetics of cuts:

    If green-tree retention is dispersed, higher levels of retention produce higher perceived scenic beauty.

    Dispersed retention harvests require about 25% retention to avoid average perceptions of ugliness. 

    15% aggregated retention with visual impact mitigation

    15% aggregated retention with no visual impact mitigation

    15% dispersed retention with visual impact mitigation

    15% dispersed retention with no visual impact mitigation

    37

    http://www.cfr.washington.edu/research.demo/research/social_perceptions/Social_perceptions_text.htm


    • Wildlife scientists soils in PNW formed from volcanic materials (tephra) prefer aggregated spatial patterns; Hydrologists like a dispersed spatial pattern

    Host: Douglas-firPseudotsuga menziesii (Mirbel) Franco Photographer: Doug Maguire, Oregon State University Wilmer Location:Oregon, United States http://www.invasive.org/browse/detail.cfm?imgnum=2714011

    38


    Principles of Ecological Forestry soils in PNW formed from volcanic materials (tephra)

    (orNew ForestryorEcosystem Management)

    • Forest management, focused heavily on enhancing ecological complexity, is an evolving area of interest. It can be a major objective or be incorporated into management for objectives such as income, wildlifehabitat, or recreation. It involves consideration of three basic principles:

    • Incorporation of biological legacies (features of pre-disturbance forests) into harvesting prescriptions

    • Incorporation of natural stand development processes into intermediate treatments

    • Allowing appropriate recovery periods between regeneration harvests

    39

    http://ncrs.fs.fed.us/fmg/nfmg/fm101/silv/p4_ecology.html


    How do we incorporate what we’ve learned to soils in PNW formed from volcanic materials (tephra)maintain species and water quality that we value as well as to continue sustainable timber extraction?

    The key seems to be preserving ecosystem structure and processes.

    40


    Lessons learned soils in PNW formed from volcanic materials (tephra)

    • Maintain habitat at both large and small scales; Especially by creating reserves with no resource extraction; Easier than restoring damaged habitat.

    • Maintain buffers and corridors along aquatic systems.

    • Pay special attention that roading doesn’t overly contribute to erosion and habitat fragmentation.

    • FINALLY, and only after the above factors are considered, plan for timber harvest incorporating principles learned from natural forest disturbances, such as green tree retention (“variable retention harvesting”).

    41


    ad