1 / 19

SHOT IN THE FANNIE MAE

SHOT IN THE FANNIE MAE. The History of a Financial Disaster. Background. In 1977, Community Reinvestment Act CRA is signed into law by President Carter Designed to prevent discrimination and promote affordable housing in low-income communities

adila
Download Presentation

SHOT IN THE FANNIE MAE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SHOT IN THE FANNIE MAE The History of a Financial Disaster

  2. Background • In 1977, Community Reinvestment Act CRA is signed into law by President Carter • Designed to prevent discrimination and promote affordable housing in low-income communities • Encouraged mortgage lending through two government sponsored enterprises (GSEs), Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac • Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are regulated by Congress. • Fannie Mae buys mortgages from other companies. • It is backed by the taxpayers for all losses, but keeps all profits.

  3. 1993 • President Clinton ordered new regulations for the CRA to increase access to mortgage credit for inner city and distressed rural communities. • The new rules featured: • strictly numerical assessments to get a satisfactory CRA rating using federal home-loan data broken down by neighborhood, income group, and race • encouraging community groups (e.g., Acorn) to complain when banks were not loaning enough to specified neighborhood, income group, and race and allowing these groups to collect a fee from the banks for marketing these mortgages (as of 2000 $9.5 billion had been paid to such groups).

  4. 1993-1998 • The number of CRA mortgage loans increased by 39 percent between 1993 and 1998, while other loans increased by only 17 percent. • The chief executive of Countrywide Financial, the nation's largest mortgage lender, said that in order to approve minority applications, "lenders have had to stretch the rules a bit"

  5. 1997 • Clinton administration ordered more rule changes for Fannie and Freddie to loosen credit for low income borrowers. • Allowed them to hold just 2.5% of capital to back their investments, vs. 10% for banks. By 2007, Fannie and Freddie owned or guaranteed nearly half of the $12 trillion U.S. mortgage market.

  6. 1998 • Banks begin making thousands of bad loans,0 down, no documentation, for120%!(1998 – 2008). • Executives at Fannie receive huge bonuses if loan targets are met. • Franklin Raines and Jamie Garelick from the Clinton Administration are appointed to run Fannie Mae.

  7. 2003 • President Bush proposes a new oversight committee to clean up Fannie Mae, but Democrats derail the effort. • Rep. Melvyn Watt, (D-NC)Committee on Financial Institutions & Consumer Credit.stated, “I don’t see much other than weakening the bargaining power poorer families to get affordable housing.”

  8. 2003 • Representative Barney Frank (D-MA) claimed "These two entities—Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac—are not facing any kind of financial crisis, the more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing."

  9. 1999 - 2004 • Raines earns $90 million+ in bonuses. • Garelick earns $25 million+ in bonuses. • In 2004, Enron collapses, congress investigates, Executives Skilling & Lay are convicted for fraudulent bookkeeping. • Congress responds with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act – more heavy-handed regulation of corporations.

  10. 2004 • An OMB investigation finds massive fraudulent bookkeeping at Fannie Mae. • False numbers triggered executive bonuses every year. • Congress holds no hearings, no one goes to jail, or is punished. • WHY NOT?

  11. 1999 -2005 • Fannie Mae gives millions to Democratic causes, examples: Jesse Jackson & ACORN. • Fannie Mae pays millions to 354 congressmen and senators, from both parties. • Who got the most money?

  12. Top 4 Recipients #1Sen. Christopher Dodd, (D-CT) Chairman of the Banking, Housing, & Urban Affairs Committee #2Sen. Barack Obama, (D-IL) Federal Financial Management Committee

  13. Top 4 Recipients #3Sen. Chuck Schumer, (D-NY) Chairman of the Finance Committee #4Rep. Barney Frank, (D-MA) Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee

  14. 2005 • The Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act is sponsored by: #325 Sen. John McCain, (R-AZ) Armed Services, & Commerce, Science, & Transportation “If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole.”

  15. 2005 • None of the top4 recipients support the legislation. • The reform act is blocked by Democrats, never even making it out of committee. • None of the politicians return any of the money, tainted by fraud. In fact, some continued to receive money from Fannie Mae

  16. 2005 • Franklin Raines & top execs are forced to resign from Fannie Mae. • They do not go to jail. • There is no media “perp. walk.” • They keep their bonuses, though they finally pay $31.4 million in civil fines.

  17. 2008 • Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac go bankrupt and the government takes them over completely. • Lehman Brothers, goes bankrupt from investing in bad mortgages. • AIG gets $85 million in loan guarantees, after insuring bad loans & projects.

  18. 2008 • Franklin Raines is now a top economic advisor to the Obama Campaign which wants the government to take over more of the economy. • Did government involvement in the mortgage market work out? • How will even MORE government involvement make it better?

  19. SOURCES • Congressional Record, 5/25/06 • Herald Tribune, 4/18/08 • New York Times, 9/13/03 • www. govtrack.com, 9/17/08 • Wall Street Journal, 9-22-08

More Related