1 / 40

The C ompressed B aryonic M atter experiment

The C ompressed B aryonic M atter experiment. Claudia Höhne, GSI Darmstadt CBM collaboration. Outline physics case, observables detector layout feasibility studies (R&D of detector components). CBM @ FAIR. Physics case.

adia
Download Presentation

The C ompressed B aryonic M atter experiment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Compressed Baryonic Matter experiment Claudia Höhne, GSI Darmstadt CBM collaboration • Outline • physics case, observables • detector layout • feasibility studies • (R&D of detector components)

  2. CBM @ FAIR

  3. Physics case Q: Why do we want to build yet another heavy-ion experiment? • What do we know from theory? → Predictions from lattice QCD: • crossover transition from partonic to hadronic matter at small mB and high T • critical endpoint in intermediate range of the phase diagram • first order deconfinement phase transition at high mB but moderate T

  4. Physics case (II) • What do we know from experiment? → Heavy-ion collisions: • chemical freeze-out curve • top SPS, RHIC (high T, low mB): • partonic degrees of freedom ? • lower SPS, AGS (intermediate T-mB): • intriguing observations around 30 AGeV! [Andronic et al. Nucl. Phys. A 772, 167 (2006).

  5. Physics case (III) Q: Why do we want to build yet another heavy-ion experiment? • CBM@FAIR – high mB, moderate T: • searching for the landmarks of the QCD phase diagram • first order deconfinement phase transition • chiral phase transition • QCD critical endpoint • in A+A collisions from 10-45 AGeV (√sNN = 4.5 – 9.3 GeV) starting in 2015

  6. Dense baryonic matter Q: Do we reach energy densities high and long enough in order to reach a deconfined phase? • baryon density in central cell (Au+Au, b=0 fm) in transport calculations HSD (mean field, hadrons + resonances + strings) • enormous energy and baryon densities reached! (e > ecrit ~ 1GeV/fm3) [CBM physics group, C. Fuchs, E. Bratkovskaya priv. com.]

  7. High baryon density matter! Q: Why do we want to measure particles also at high baryon densities? • hadronic properties should be effected by the enormous baryon densities • relation to (partial) restoration of chiral symmetry? • equation of state? [Rapp, Wambach, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 25 (2000) 1, hep-ph/9909229] [Mishra et al ., PRC 69, 015202 (2004) ] D r

  8. Physics topics and Observables Q: How to measure? What to look for? • The equation-of-state at high B • collective flow of hadrons • particle production at threshold energies (open charm) side remark: equation of state at high baryon densities → relation to inner core of neutron stars! Grigorian, Blaschke, Klähn astro-ph/0612783

  9. D-mesons in matter [W. Cassing, E. Bratkovskaya, A. Sibirtsev, Nucl. Phys. A 691 (2001) 745] D-mesons sensitive to medium (EOS)! SIS100/ 300 SIS18 [Mishra et al ., PRC 69, 015202 (2004)]

  10. D-mesons in matter (II) • charm production studies at threshold: steeply rising cross section • dropping D-meson mass might give a large enhancement • measure energy dependence! • impact on flow! [E. Bratkovskaya, W. Cassing, private communication] charm quark as probe for dense matter created at FAIR

  11. Physics topics and Observables Q: How to measure? What to look for? • The equation-of-state at high B • collective flow of hadrons • particle production at threshold energies (open charm) • Deconfinement phase transition at high B • excitation function and flow of strangeness (K, , , , ) • excitation function and flow of charm (J/ψ, ψ', D0, D, c) • sequential melting of J/ψ and ψ', charmonium suppression

  12. Excitation function • For (K, , , , ,..........) measure with high precision • particle production • kinetic distributions • flow • correlations • ....... • in dependence on energy, system-size (centrality),... • → observe changes? • in ideal case for several observables at the same energy transition hadron gas QGP [NA49]

  13. Collective flow central midcentral peripheral v2 • collapse of elliptic flow of protons at lower energies signal for first order phase transition?![e.g. Stoecker, NPA 750 (2005) 121, E. Shuryak, hep-ph/0504048] • full energy dependence needed! elliptic flow v2: initial overlap eccentricity → particle azimuthal distributions f [NA49, PRC68, 034903 (2003)]

  14. Collective flow (II) • RHIC • all particles flow: strong collective behaviour! • impressive scaling of flow observed • relation to quark content of hadrons! • → partonic degrees of freedom relevant in early phase! • when does it break down? KET=mT-m

  15. Collective flow (III) charm quark as probe for dense matter created at FAIR • does charm flow at all energies? • break down of charm flow?

  16. Charmonium suppression Quarkonium dissociation temperatures – Digal, Karsch, Satz • cc production • at threshold for CBM energies! • cc produced in first inelastic interactions • pp: certain probability to form a J/y (or y') • AA: dissolved in medium? • ... difference for J/y and y'? • (sequential melting?) measure energy and system-size dependence!

  17. Physics topics and Observables Q: How to measure? What to look for? • The equation-of-state at high B • collective flow of hadrons • particle production at threshold energies (open charm) • Deconfinement phase transition at high B • excitation function and flow of strangeness (K, , , , ) • excitation function and flow of charm (J/ψ, ψ', D0, D, c) • sequential melting of J/ψ and ψ', charmonium suppression • QCD critical endpoint • excitation function of event-by-event fluctuations (K/π,...)

  18. Fluctuations [C.Roland et al., nucl-ex/0403035 S. Das, SQM06] K/p • difficulty: subtract all "trivial" fluctuations (statistical, acceptance, other correlations,...) • dynamical fluctuations of the K/p ratio increase towards lower energies  energy dependence needed for lower energies (and a better understanding)!

  19. Physics topics and Observables Q: How to measure? What to look for? • The equation-of-state at high B • collective flow of hadrons • particle production at threshold energies (open charm) • Deconfinement phase transition at high B • excitation function and flow of strangeness (K, , , , ) • excitation function and flow of charm (J/ψ, ψ', D0, D, c) • sequential melting of J/ψ and ψ', charmonium suppression • QCD critical endpoint • excitation function of event-by-event fluctuations (K/π,...) • Onset of chiral symmetry restoration at high B • in-medium modifications of hadrons (,, e+e-(μ+μ-), D)

  20. Dileptons  n  p p  ++ K e+, μ+ r e-, μ- Dileptons are penetrating probes! lifetime of r-meson 1.3 fm/c → probe the early fireball! (ct of : w – 23 fm/c, f – 44 fm/c, J/y – 2.3 fm/c)

  21. Dileptons (II) hep-ph/0604269 • new results from top SPS energy (√sNN = 17.3 GeV): • → modification of r spectral function, importance of baryons! • measure in dependence on baryon density (energy)! CERES NA60

  22. Dileptons (III) Q: What is the best way to measure? e+e-↔ m+m-

  23. Physics topics and Observables Q: How to measure? What to look for? • The equation-of-state at high B • collective flow of hadrons • particle production at threshold energies (open charm) • Deconfinement phase transition at high B • excitation function and flow of strangeness (K, , , , ) • excitation function and flow of charm (J/ψ, ψ', D0, D, c) • sequential melting of J/ψ and ψ', charmonium suppression • QCD critical endpoint • excitation function of event-by-event fluctuations (K/π,...) • Onset of chiral symmetry restoration at high B • in-medium modifications of hadrons (,, e+e-(μ+μ-), D) CBM Physics Book (theory) in preparation

  24. The CBM experiment • tracking, momentum determination, vertex reconstruction: radiation hard silicon pixel/strip detectors (STS) in a magnetic dipole field • electron ID: RICH & TRD •  p suppression  104 • hadron ID: TOF (& RICH) • photons, p0, m: ECAL • PSD for event characterization • high speed DAQ and trigger high interaction rate long beamtime → rare probes! STS

  25. Modified CBM setup → dimuons • for investigation of dimuons study alternative CBM setup with active muon absorbers (Fe + C + detector layers) after the STS • ... move absorbers out for hadron runs

  26. Dileptons - electrons central Au+Au, 25 AGeV • low-mass vector mesons: try to reject large physical background (g-conversion, Dalitz decays) by high performance tracking • J/y: cut on pt (1.2GeV) • high purity of electron identification needed! J/y meson low-mass vector mesons S/B=1.7 eff. 12% w S/B = 0.2 eff. 7.5%

  27. Dileptons - muons central Au+Au, 25 AGeV • low efficiency for soft muons → use momentum dependent m identification? • phantastic J/y, even y' should be accessible • however:high hit densities in detectors! low-mass vector mesons J/y meson w S/B = 0.42 eff. 1.8% S/B ~ 30 eff. 13%

  28. STS tracking Challenge: high track density  600 charged particles in  25o • task • track reconstruction: • 0.1 GeV/c < p  10-12 GeV/c • Dp/p ~ 1% (p=1 GeV/c) • primary and secondary vertex reconstruction (resolution  50 mm) • V0 track pattern recognition D+→ p+p+K- (ct = 317 mm) D0 → K-p+ (ct = 124 mm)

  29. Open charm production central Au+Au, 25 AGeV • D0→ K-p+ (ct = 124 mm) • <D0> = 4∙ 10-5 → ~ 2 D0/s for 1MHz interaction rate (minbias Au+Au) • first MAPS detector at 10cm • ~53 mm secondary vertex resolution • proton identification via TOF • even better signal for • D+ → K-p+p+ • (3-particle 2nd vertex) 1.6 107 central Au+Au collisions, 25 AGeV

  30. CBM collaboration China: CCNU Wuhan USTC Hefei Croatia: RBI, Zagreb Univ. Mannheim Univ. Münster FZ Rossendorf GSI Darmstadt Norway: Univ. Bergen Kurchatov Inst. Moscow LHE, JINR Dubna LPP, JINR Dubna Poland: Krakow Univ. Warsaw Univ. Silesia Univ. Katowice Nucl. Phys. Inst. Krakow LIT, JINR Dubna MEPHI Moscow Obninsk State Univ. PNPI Gatchina SINP, Moscow State Univ. St. Petersburg Polytec. U. Hungaria: KFKI Budapest Eötvös Univ. Budapest Cyprus: Nikosia Univ. India: VECC Kolkata SAHA Kolkata IOP Bhubaneswar Univ. Chandigarh Czech Republic: CAS, Rez Techn. Univ. Prague France: IPHC Strasbourg Portugal: LIP Coimbra Romania: NIPNE Bucharest Ukraine: Shevchenko Univ. , Kiev Univ. Varanasi IlT Kharagpur Korea: Korea Univ. Seoul Pusan National Univ. Russia: IHEP Protvino INR Troitzk ITEP Moscow KRI, St. Petersburg Germany: Univ. Heidelberg, Phys. Inst. Univ. HD, Kirchhoff Inst. Univ. Frankfurt Univ. Kaiserslautern 46 institutions > 400 members Strasbourg, September 2006

  31. Physics case Q: Why do we want to build yet another heavy-ion experiment? • CBM@FAIR – high mB, moderate T: • searching for the landmarks of the QCD phase diagram • first order deconfinement phase transition • chiral phase transition • QCD critical endpoint • in A+A collisions from 10-45 AGeV (√sNN = 4.5 – 9.3 GeV) starting in 2015

  32. additional slides

  33. CbmRoot simulation framework • detector simulation (GEANT3) • full event reconstruction: track reconstruction, add RICH, TRD and TOF info • result from feasibility studies in the following: central Au+Au collisions at 25 AGeV beam energy

  34. STS tracking (II) • set of silicon tracking stations inside magnetic field („heart of CBM“) • MVD for high precision vertex resolution • Si strip for main tracker • challenge: readout speed (10 MHz interaction rate), radiation hardness (109 ions/s), material budget, resolution • layout simulations • Si-strip sensor design • system integration • fast self-triggered readout

  35. STS R&D  4"280 µm Microstrip Sensors Tracking Stations layout studies module design

  36. fast self-triggered readout electronics micro-strip sensor NXYTER chip produced; DETNI − GSI test system under construction

  37. Hadron identification – TOF (RPC) simulations: time resolution 80ps, TOF wall in 10m distance to target

  38. D-mesons in matter [W. Cassing, E. Bratkovskaya, A. Sibirtsev, Nucl. Phys. A 691 (2001) 745] SIS18 [M. Lutz, Phys. Lett. B 426, 12 (1998)] us repulsive potential us attractive potential

  39. Sequential dissociation of charmonium? (J/)/DY = 29.2  2.3 L = 3.4 fm Preliminary! Quarkonium dissociation temperatures – Digal, Karsch, Satz Preliminary! [NA60]

  40. Fluctuations (II) • However .... • mean-pt (SpT) fluctuations rather constant • changing fluctuations of net electric charge ndyn? •  importance of resonance decays?! [H. Appelshaeuser and H. Sako for CERES, nucl-ex/0409022] [CERES, NPA 727, 97 (2003)]

More Related