1 / 25

2013-14 Osceola School District’s Classroom Instructor Evaluation

2013-14 Osceola School District’s Classroom Instructor Evaluation. The Ins and Outs of Our Classroom Instructor Evaluation 2013-2014 . This presentation is specific to Classroom Instructors only.

abram
Download Presentation

2013-14 Osceola School District’s Classroom Instructor Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2013-14Osceola School District’sClassroom Instructor Evaluation The Ins and Outs of Our Classroom Instructor Evaluation 2013-2014

  2. This presentation is specific to Classroom Instructors only Non-classroom Instructors will be evaluated on a new model, which will be reviewed through a separate presentation. Media Specialists Deans Guidance Counselors Psychologists Social Workers Compliance Specialists (ESOL & ESE) Athletic Directors Academic Coaches/Resource Specialists

  3. Today’s Objectives: Participants will examine the basic components of the classroom teacher evaluation. Participants will leave with a working knowledge of some changes associated with the evaluation: Deliberate Practice High Yield Strategies Student Growth Criteria Best Practices for success

  4. New Key Terms: High Yield Strategies: 14 identified elements found in Domain 1 of the Marzano Evaluation Model: Nine elements embedded in the Marzano Evaluation Model that research correlates with a high probability for student achievement. Seven elements embedded in the Marzano Evaluation Model that are correlated with successful implementation of the Common Core State Standards. Deliberate Practice: Chosen element, based on previous school year data, that is deliberately focused on for the current school year, and given a score based on the ‘growth’ in the implementation of element.

  5. Evaluation- for Classroom Teachers

  6. Domains 1-4High impact instructional strategies and professional practices80% Deliberate Practice Based on past years data, a selected element deliberately practiced for growth on that element. 20%

  7. Domain 1 • Formal • Informal • Walk Through • Domain 2 • Review of Evidence • Domain 3 • Review of Evidence • Domain 4 • Review of Evidence Domain 1-4 Observations Observation:  Event when instructional practices are observed (domain 1) or evidences are reviewed ( domain 2-4)

  8. Domain 1 Observations Domain 2 Observationsthat count towards the Final Evaluation Domain 3 Domains 1-4 Domain 4

  9. Classroom Strategies and Behaviors Planning and Preparing Reflecting on Teaching Collegiality and Professionalism 60 Thin slices of research based instructional strategies/professional practices that have a high impact on student achievement.

  10. 41 Elements • 1-2 Teacher Selected • 1 selected for Deliberate Practice Domain 1 • 1 Steering Committee • Administratively Assigned 41 Thin slices of research based instructional strategies that have a high impact on student achievement.

  11. Must have pre-conference and post conference (face to face or via the evaluation website) • Must be pre-scheduled/announced • 25 minutes- entire class period • Data points shall count towards Final Evaluation. • Only those elements that were identified during pre-conference which may include: • Teacher selected element • Deliberate Practice element • Steering Committee Selected Element • Administratively assigned element • No more then two of the High Yield Strategies (found on page 36 of the Instructional Employees Evaluation Handbook) Domain 1 Formal Observations

  12. High Yield Instructional Strategies

  13. Any of the 41 elements may be scored upon • Only instructional strategies that apply at time of observation • elements for which the teacher provides substantial behavioral evidence, OR • elements which are more appropriate for the lesson but were not observed • Unannounced • 10-20 minutes • Data points may count towards Final Evaluation. • Informal observations may serve as feedback only. Domain 1 Informal Observations

  14. Does not count towards final evaluation. • Feedback can be provided on any of the 41 elements. • Only instructional strategies that apply at time of observation • Unannounced • 3-5 minutes Domain 1 Walk Through Observations

  15. Data points may count towards Final Evaluation. • Additional Observational Sessions may serve as feedback only. • It is NOT compliance of lesson plan completion. • It’s ‘How’ you plan for your Lessons & Units of Instruction using best practices. • It is ‘Why’ you focus on certain strategies based on data and student performance. Domain 2 Observational Session: Planning & Preparing

  16. Data points may count towards Final Evaluation. • Additional Observational Sessions may serve as feedback only. • It is NOT compliance of IPDP/Deliberate Practice completion. • It is a reflection of implementation and process of the following: • IPDP/ Deliberate Practice • Lesson Planning and/or • Identification of pedagogical strengths and weakness • And how this reflection is being utilized to • Improve instructional practice • Influence how you plan for lessons and units of instruction. Domain 3 Observational Session: Reflecting on Teaching

  17. Data points may count towards Final Evaluation. • Observational session may serve as feedback only. • It is: • Adherence to District and School Rules and Procedures and, • Participating in District and School Initiatives • It is also: • Serving as a ‘positive contributor’ to the culture and climate of School and District. Domain 4 Observational Session: Collegiality & Professionalism

  18. First year of implementation (2013-14 school year) instructors will be held harmless (no growth=no penalty) • Based on previous year’s scored elements from formal, informal and walk through observations • Value calculated from growth of former year’s average score of element and current year’s average score of element. • Counts 20% of the Instructional Practice Score of the Final Evaluation • May be the same element as the ‘Teacher Selected Element” • But must have previous year’s data to serve as both. DeliberatePractice

  19. 1 Element

  20. Student Growth Value

  21. For the current school year

  22. Pre & Post Test Choices for IPDP • 35-50 questions (Same number of solutions) • Reliable and Valid • Academic Rigor • Test security • Instructional Employees Evaluation Handbook (pages 23-25). • Submit copy of pre/post test to your supervising administrator by Aug.23 along with signed security agreement.

  23. Questions?

More Related