1 / 13

Muons in Atlas TileCal G4 vs G3 vs TB

Muons in Atlas TileCal G4 vs G3 vs TB. Iouri Gavrilov (IHEP,Protvino,Russia). Geant4 vs Geant3 and TB. G4 version : Geant4.4.1 (QGSP_1) G4 range cut : 0.1 mm G3 : from Tomas Davidek Data calibration was performed using electrons (both MC and TB)

abeni
Download Presentation

Muons in Atlas TileCal G4 vs G3 vs TB

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Muons in Atlas TileCalG4 vs G3 vs TB Iouri Gavrilov (IHEP,Protvino,Russia)

  2. Geant4 vs Geant3 and TB • G4 version : Geant4.4.1 (QGSP_1) • G4 range cut : 0.1 mm • G3 : from Tomas Davidek • Data calibration was performed using electrons (both MC and TB) and Landau*Gauss fit (which is better than Moyal fit) I.Gavrilov, G4 Physics Validation of LHC Simulation

  3. Muons at -90 deg • Energy 180 GeV • Tilerow 5 • Photostatistics effects: 40 pe/GeV (in production barrel cells) I.Gavrilov, G4 Physics Validation of LHC Simulation

  4. -90 deg , tilerow 5, energy 180 GeV I.Gavrilov, G4 Physics Validation of LHC Simulation

  5. -90 deg , tilerow 5, energy 180 GeV Muons at 90 degrees Top plot – normalization with 20 GeV electrons Bottom plot – normalization with muon peak G4 better predicts TB data I.Gavrilov, G4 Physics Validation of LHC Simulation

  6. Muons: eta-scan • Energy 180 GeV h= 0.15, 0.25, 0.35, 0.55, 0.65, 0.75 • Photostatistics effects: 53 pe/GeV • Next slides: • Top plot – normalization with 20 GeV electrons • Bottom plot – normalization with muons at h= 0.35 • Fit is made with Landau*Gauss convolution I.Gavrilov, G4 Physics Validation of LHC Simulation

  7. h= 0.15 • G4 better simulates data I.Gavrilov, G4 Physics Validation of LHC Simulation

  8. h= 0.25 • G4 is better I.Gavrilov, G4 Physics Validation of LHC Simulation

  9. h= 0.35 • G4 is better I.Gavrilov, G4 Physics Validation of LHC Simulation

  10. h= 0.55 • G4 is better I.Gavrilov, G4 Physics Validation of LHC Simulation

  11. h= 0.65 • Both G4 and G3 do not succeed in predicting TB data, but G4 seems to be better I.Gavrilov, G4 Physics Validation of LHC Simulation

  12. h= 0.75 • G4 fails I.Gavrilov, G4 Physics Validation of LHC Simulation

  13. Conclusions and Future Plans • G4 predicts better the TB data • But situation is unclear at large  • Problems with e- calibration • Simulation at different energies &  • Optimization of range/energy cuts I.Gavrilov, G4 Physics Validation of LHC Simulation

More Related