1 / 35

Two Summer Research Assistant Positions in Plant/Pollinator Evolution and Conservation

Two Summer Research Assistant Positions in Plant/Pollinator Evolution and Conservation. Position 1: Part time, on campus, to evaluate divergent selection on floral traits by pollinators (mostly bees) and water availability.

Download Presentation

Two Summer Research Assistant Positions in Plant/Pollinator Evolution and Conservation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Two Summer Research Assistant Positions in Plant/Pollinator Evolution and Conservation Position 1: Part time, on campus, to evaluate divergent selection on floral traits by pollinators (mostly bees) and water availability. Position 2: Full time, Vancouver Island, to assist in building pollinator interaction webs and measure pollen limitation of wildflowers in the endangered Garry Oak Ecosystem. Both begin mid-April and run through July (flexible at both ends) To Apply: Send a letter detailing which position you are interested in and why you should be hired, plus a CV including contact information for two references, to Elizabeth Elle: eelle@sfu.ca.

  2. SCHEDULE FOR NEXT 2-3 weeks - F- Restoration M- Reintroductions W- Background for issue based tutorial not attending will reduce ability to participate in the tutorial Guest – CWS – Habitat approaches attendance required New topic - Reserve Design

  3. RESTORATION terminology natural succession vs active management case studies REINTRODUCTIONS Why and when? Australian and New Zealand perspectives Canadian reintroductions The good, the bad and the ugly

  4. ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION CURRENT STATE OF SITE Reclamation Rehabilitation Re-creation Restoration Replacement Stabilize Remove pollutants Revegetate Aesthetics Improve Return to historic condition Restore structure, function, diversity and dynamics of ecosystem DESIRED STATE OF SITE

  5. RESTORATION TOOLS Natural succession - let nature take care of it Mitigating/altering factors impacting the site Introducing and promoting species

  6. NATURAL SUCCESSION Eg Restoration of Tropical Montane Forest, Goal restore composition structure function prevent spp loss and maintain viable populations Options Allow natural regeneration Plant native trees, then allow succession

  7. Restoration of Tropical Montane Forest Ucumari Regional Park, Central Andes, Columbia Ecoregion with enormous diversity Degraded - cattle ranch, pasture, logging NATURAL INTERVENTION REGENERATION Plant native Andean alder 40 yrs later

  8. Ucumari Regional Park, Central Andes NATURAL AND TREE PLANTATIONS Mixed uneven canopy Continuous vertical foliage 63 spp per 0.125 ha plot Alder dominated canopy No sub-canopy43 spp per 0.125 ha plot 178 spp found in restored plots Only 23 shared by two forest types Initial conditions determine restored ecosystem Natural succession --> greater diversity BUT success depends on availability of seed sources

  9. NATURAL SUCCESSION Restoration of Fresh Kills Landfill, NY City • Received urban waste for 50 yrs • Created four mounds 100+ ft tall • Mounds “capped” 2001 Goal Restore wetlands,grasslands and woodlands that will offer wildlife habitat and natural open spaces

  10. Restoration of Fresh Kills Landfill, NY City Natural regeneration ---> little structure, diversity Planted shrubs, oak, pine (17 spp) ---> arrival 20 new spp. in 2 yrs Planting adds spp, provides habitat that allows arrival animal-dispersed seeds

  11. Fresh Kills 2016

  12. NATURAL SUCCESSION Herb species diversity in regenerating forest Proportion of ancient forest left Q. Conclusions? Vellend 2003 Ecol 84: 1158-64

  13. RESTORATION - mitigating impacts on a site • Steps: • Define Goal - restore what? • Identify constraints Disturbance regime Lack seed source/limited spp pool Invasive spp - biogeochemical feedback Herbivory or other trophic interactions Environmental change • Prioritize - • Address Constraint • Evaluate and GO TO 1

  14. Restoration of tropical dry forest, Guanacaste Conservation Area, Costa Rica Issue - conversion of forest for pasture - dry forest is the most endangered lowland forest type - less 0.1% original habitat is protected Daniel Janzen

  15. Restoration of tropical dry forest, Costa Rica Guanacaste - major restoration project - 47000 ha pasture + 23000 ha park - 130 staff

  16. Restoration of tropical dry forest, Guanacaste Conservation Area, Costa Rica Constraints - fires set to maintain pasture - pasture dominated by exotics - seeds are animal dispersed Prioritize Step 1 - aggressive fire control; fire breaks, fire access roads Step 2 - horses/cows used to promote seed dispersal

  17. Restoration of tropical dry forest, Costa Rica Results Areas protected 5-10 yrs - Fires reduced by 93% - trees 10-15 ft tall Pasture expected to be closed canopy forest in 20-50 yrs mature forest in 300 yrs

  18. Restoration of Garry Oak Ecosystems BUT dominated by exotics (grasses/broom) High diversity Native wild flowers Restoration constraints: invasive spp, grazing, fire

  19. Evaluating constraints: an experimental approach • Plants compete with each other for resources “Bottom-up hypothesis” 2. Herbivores regulate plants “ top-down hypothesis” 3. Herbivores eat certain plants which helps less palatable species “enemy of my enemy hypothesis”

  20. Many deer Few deer Emily Gonzalez – UBC 200 plots in Southern gulf and San Juan Islands

  21. 200 plots in Southern gulf and San Juan Islands

  22. Evaluating constraints: an experimental approach Plant native species in plots Seeds Seedlings Treatments Herbivore exclusion, Competitor removal Fence Cut Factorial 2x2 design

  23. Competition (C) and Herbivore (H) impacts on seedlings and seeds Gonzales and Arcese Ecology 2009

  24. Evaluating actions: an experimental approach Removal of competitors (burn or mow) Re-seed with natives Added Non-added exotics 300 200 100 0 No. Seedlings Burning can help some natives but it helps some exotics too Control Burned Seeded Both MacDougal and Turkington Ecology

  25. Restoration of tall grass prairie Tall grass prairies covered 250 million acres of Midwest dominated by 30 grass + 250 forb spp 1% remaining most endangered ecosystem in NA Midewin National Tall Grass Prairie projected initiated 1996 19,000 acres in Illinois massive restoration project

  26. Midewin National Tall Grass Prairie Action - removal excess willow/cottonwood - plantings 69000 plants, 79 sp - seeding - 112 spp

  27. RESTORATION ECOLOGY New discipline Active research - how to assemble a community order effects, trophic interactions Requires multidisciplinary approach clear goals community involvement planning $$$

  28. ANIMAL RESTORATION PROJECTS Once habitat is restored How successful are (re)introductions of animals? REINTRODUCTIONS - OVERVIEW Terminology Why and when? Australian and New Zealand perspectives Canadian reintroductions The good, the bad and the ugly

  29. TERMINOLOGY Reintroduction - introduce into historic range Translocation - movement from A to B Supplementation/reinforcement Benign introduction - introduce outside known range Loggerhead shrike takahe

  30. REINTRODUCTIONS - Why and When? Why maintain/restore biodiversity re-establish keystone taxa establish viable wild populations limit long-term management costs When need to increase number or range no risk to source population cause of decline removed sufficient protected habitat community support impact on people +ve $$$ IUCN guidelines

  31. REINTRODUCTIONS - Can they work? Famous success stories Golden lion tamarin 1970’s 200 147 captive bred releases 2001 - 1000 % wildborn now 88% Mauritius kestrel 1974 - 4 birds 1994 333rd release 2000 ca. 700

  32. REINTRODUCTIONS - Will they work? Wolves in Yellowstone Cause of extirpation Human hunting Reintroduction 1995-97 41 individuals Current population in YNP - 271+ Prospects No longer “endangered”

  33. REINTRODUCTIONS - Will they work? The Guam rail Cause of extirpation brown tree snake (introduced) Reintroduction Rota - predator free island Guam - 60 ha fenced area Prospects on Guam - not good

  34. REINTRODUCTIONS - Will they work? MOST IMPORTANT CONSIDERATION What caused extirpation in the first place? Has that threat been reduced/eliminated NEXT LECTURE Reintroductions Australian and New Zealand perspectives Canadian reintroductions The good, the bad and the ugly

More Related