1 / 31

Presentation to IADF Conference 1 October 2004

City of Johannesburg municipal bond issue. Presentation to IADF Conference 1 October 2004. Overview of presentation. The City of Johannesburg Institutional & legal framework for municipal debt Process and framework adopted for the bond issues Results of the bond issues Lessons learnt.

Download Presentation

Presentation to IADF Conference 1 October 2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. City of Johannesburgmunicipal bond issue Presentation to IADF Conference1 October 2004

  2. Overview of presentation • The City of Johannesburg • Institutional & legal framework for municipal debt • Process and framework adopted for the bond issues • Results of the bond issues • Lessons learnt

  3. Africa, South Africa & Johannesburg City of Johannesburg

  4. Towards the City of Johannesburg (11 administrations) 1995 elections (5 Councils) 2000 elections

  5. Basic parameters • Johannesburg accounts for 16% of national economic product • The population is approximately 3.2 million people • Over 1 million households • Around 100 000 businesses • The population is growing at about 4% per year • The City of Johannesburg … • employs 25 000 staff across 14 service delivery entities • has consolidated budgets of: • Operating ZAR 11,936 m (approx USD 1,840 m) • Capital ZAR 1,978 m (approx USD 300 m) • Total ZAR 13,908 m (approx USD 2,140 m) * Conversion rate – 1 USD = 6.5 ZAR

  6. The City of Johannesburg

  7. Sources of operating income

  8. Sources of Capital Funding

  9. Overdraft & call bonds (ZAR million)

  10. Capital expenditure (ZAR m)

  11. Credit rating upgrade (Local currency rating) 1999: Fitch BBB+ F2+ 2003: Fitch A- F2+ 2003: CA Ratings A A2+

  12. Continuing financial challenges • To increase revenue collection rates • To increase capital expenditure • To fund further increases in service delivery • To achieve a clean audit opinion • To obtain further credit rating improvements

  13. Overview of presentation • The City of Johannesburg • Institutional & legal framework for municipal debt • Process and framework adopted for the bond issues • Results of the bond issues • Lessons learnt

  14. Legal framework • Local government legislation: • Constitution of RSA (1996) • Municipal Structures Act (1998) • Municipal Systems Act (2000) • Municipal Finance Management Act (2003) • Property Rating Act (2004) • Financial market legislation: • Financial Markets Control Act • Financial Services Board Act • Strong legal framework for investors: • Depth of legal system, and enforceability of agreements • Comprehensivelyregulated financial markets • Municipalities required to comply strictly to legalframework

  15. Institutional & policy framework • Regulators • National Treasury – fiscal policy, intergovernmental fiscal relations, etc • South African Reserve Bank - monetary policy • Financial Services Board - regulates the non-banking financial sector • Lenders • Commercial banks • Development Bank of SA • Infrastructure Finance Corporation • Other • Bond Exchange of South Africa – Facilitation of bond trading • Debt Issuers Association – private association of issuers • Policy parameters for municipal borrowing • No government guarantee • No tax advantages in holding municipal debt • Municipalities may not borrow overseas

  16. Outstanding listed bonds in SA Total: R527.6 billion ($81.2 billion) (Source: BESA)

  17. Overview of presentation • The City of Johannesburg • Institutional & legal framework for municipal debt • Process and framework adopted for the bond issues • Results of the bond issues • Lessons learnt

  18. Reasons for the municipal bond issue • To diversify funding sources • Only seven banks – running into `single obligor’ limits • To reduce the average cost of borrowing • To extend the funding maturity profile • Improve the matching of funding maturity to asset life • To release escrow accounts • To initiate the municipal bond market

  19. Process adopted • 2001 - Idea first considered: But concluded we were not yet ready • 2003 - Idea revisited • Feasibility study & analysis of existing debt profile • Visit to Mexican municipal issuers • Appointment of Bond Advisor & Lead Arrangers • Road shows • International – to find an international guarrantor • Local – to introduce `the credit’ to the investors • 2004 – Full speed ahead • Local road shows – to sell the offering • Rating agencies • Legal work regarding guarrantees etc • Book-building

  20. Basic framework adopted • Johannesburg would issue two bonds • ZAR 1 billion, 6 years, unenhanced (COJ01) • ZAR 1 billion, 12 years, enhanced (COJ02) • 40% guarrantee by IFC and DBSA • No intercept, administration trust or other special vehicle, but: • Comfort to investors and guarantors • Access to information - teach the market about municipal credit (a new asset class) • Transparency & communications • Trustee to act on behalf of investors & guarrantors • Separate bank account (in CoJ’s name) for settlement amounts

  21. Basic framework adopted (cont.) • Negative pledge • CoJ must retain at least R8 billion of un-encumbered assets • Cash-flow provisions • 6 months rolling reserve account • Covenants • Interest to opex ratios to be maintained below 7% • Trading and settlement • BESA has listed the bonds • Clearing & settlement as per BESA rules • Comprehensive events of default (ten conditions)

  22. 1000 Outstanding Principal Guarantee amount of ZAR 400 mm declines proportionately with bond years 9.5-12 MM Rand Payment structure (COJ02) (12 Year Amortizing Bond with assumed 13.5% coupon and 40% Guarantee) 800 600 400 Debt Service 200 Years …8 9 1 2 3… 10 11 12

  23. Overview of presentation • The City of Johannesburg • Institutional & legal framework for municipal debt • Process and framework adopted for the bond issues • Results of the bond issues • Lessons learnt

  24. Issue results • Successful issue by first-time issuer • Inaugurated the municipal bond market • First partially guarranteed bond in SA

  25. Strategic objectives achieved • Diversified Johannesburg’s funding sources • 15 new investors (mainly private sector institutions) • including some very risk-averse investors • positioned ourselves for higher capex going forward • `New constituency’ – enhanced credit discipline • Reduced the average cost of borrowing • interest savings of approx R20 m per annum • Restructured the debt maturity profile • profile shifted outwards • Release of escrow investments that were linked to loans

  26. Change in liability profile (ZAR m)

  27. COJ01: spread above benchmark (Source: BESA)

  28. Overview of presentation • The City of Johannesburg • Institutional & legal framework for municipal debt • Process and framework adopted for the bond issues • Results of the bond issues • Lessons learnt

  29. Pre-conditions? • Sound legal framework • Sound national financial policies (fiscal, monetary, etc) • `Reasonable’ credit rating • Some investors rely on rating reports • Some have their own assessment capacity • Credit enhancement may be necessary • Ability to manage the bond issue - internal treasury capacity • Good strategy & planning • long-term economic development strategy • long-term capital development plan and funding plan • Sound leadership & management • Politicians & officials • Know your problems, have a plan to deal with them, and show some progress. • Clean audit report?

  30. Keep it simple! • Market accepts that the municipalities have challenges • They will lend, but will price the risk • New issuers (and issuers inaugurating the market) can expect to pay a premium • Transparency breeds confidence - spreads tighten • Foreign guarantors • Sometimes seek to impose different standards than apply locally (environment, legal, pricing) • May not thoroughly understand the local environment • There is no substitute for having your own capacity • Be alert! Lessons learnt by CoJ

  31. Johannesburg home page: http://www.joburg.org.za Thank you …

More Related