1 / 5

A Proposal Related to the Establishment of a New Regulation for Category L

Informal document GRSP-52-09 (52nd GRSP, 11–14 December 2012, agenda item 18). A Proposal Related to the Establishment of a New Regulation for Category L. JASIC. Ⅰ. Proporsal.

aaronwagner
Download Presentation

A Proposal Related to the Establishment of a New Regulation for Category L

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Informal documentGRSP-52-09 (52nd GRSP, 11–14 December 2012, agenda item 18) A Proposal Related to the Establishment of a New Regulation for Category L JASIC

  2. Ⅰ. Proporsal *R100 (electrical/battery safety standards for electric vehicles) is a standard based on the 4-wheel configuration. *For uniform regulations covering categories M/N/L, adoption by individual countries and harmonization across the categories at revision is essential. This may possibly cause delays especially between categories with substantially different structures or design concepts. ->A separate regulation should be established for category L whose structures and safety concept are different from others. (See the other regulations for these categories below.) M/N L L1/2 L3/4/5 Emission regulations R83 R40 R47 Engine type Driving mode (usage) L2/4/5 L3 L1 Noise L6/7 R51 R9 R41 R63 Social demand Vehicle/engine structure L1/2/5 L1/2 L1 Lamps R4/5/7/19/31/65/77/91/98/99/112/113/123 R50/56/74/76/82/113 Driving backward Vehicle structure L1/2/6 L1~7 Anti-theft devices With passenger compartment Separation and protectors to protect passengers R116 R62 Crushable zone and seat restraint to protect passengers Functional complexity Passenger compartment L1~5 Tyres R30 R75 More freedom for passengers Driving on flat tyres L1~5 Light weight up to approx. 200 kg Braking Crash requirements R78 R13H Vehicle weight of 1 t or more Both hands required for operation (Less freedom for passengers) No compartment Body stability L1~7 衝突要件なし Rear-view mirrors R81 R46 Passenger compartment Handle mount Electric shock/battery safety R100 R??? Vehicle structure/size Passenger protection concept

  3. Ⅱ. justification Electric shock/battery safety R100 R??? Vehicle structure/size Passenger protection concept Body Shell Vehicle structure/size NoBody Shell & Passenger Compartment Passenger Compartment Saddled Sit-in Small size/light weight 3395*1475*16101070 kg 1830*695*1065 mm106 kg Portable Battery →DirectContactRequirement →Add Battery Drop Requirement Drop Passenger’s posture onboard More freedom Balancing required and less freedom Passenger freedom → Protection Degree For Direct Contact

  4. Electric shock/battery safety R100 R??? Passenger protection concept Vehicle structure/size Passenger protection concept Body Shell NoBody Shell & Passenger Compartment Passenger Compartment Sit-in Crushable Zone Crushable Zone Component test only for category L →Mechanical Integrity →Mechanical Impact Saddled Post-Crash Requirement → Helmet Air Bag SeatBelt Protectors Long Sleeves Gloves Right Wearing! Restraint Separate Boots No need to require the time to go out of the vehicle →Mechanical Integrity →FireResistance

  5. With regard to the proposed addition of category L to R100, it is appropriate to establish a new regulation for category L separately from categories M/N because the former is different from the latter in terms of structure and safety concept. END

More Related