1 / 10

Alan Thomas, Director, Defense and Intelligence Practice, Compusearch Software Systems Session #: 2110 April 16, 2008

DoD’s IGT Initiative: Leading the Way to Improved Business Operations and Accountability . Alan Thomas, Director, Defense and Intelligence Practice, Compusearch Software Systems Session #: 2110 April 16, 2008 1:30 – 2:30 PM. Panel participants. Danny Werfel (moderator) Controller, OMB

aaron
Download Presentation

Alan Thomas, Director, Defense and Intelligence Practice, Compusearch Software Systems Session #: 2110 April 16, 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DoD’s IGT Initiative: Leading the Way to Improved Business Operations and Accountability Alan Thomas, Director, Defense and Intelligence Practice, Compusearch Software Systems Session #: 2110 April 16, 2008 1:30 – 2:30 PM

  2. Panel participants • Danny Werfel (moderator) • Controller, OMB • Shay Assad • Director, Defense Procurement & Acquisition Policy • Radha Sekar • Assistant Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) • Open Q&A

  3. Interagency acquisition is big business with over 40% of total Federal obligations spent through interagency contract vehicles • Request for goods or services from a requesting federal agency (“buyer”) to a performing federal agency (“seller”) • Agreements often established using a Military Interdepartmental Purchase Request (MIPR) or Interagency Assistance Agreement (IAA) All Other Obligations ($213B in FY04) Total Obligations Interagency Obligations ($142B in FY04)* *Source: Acquisition Advisory Panel

  4. 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007+ IGT identified Intragovernmental Updated OMB IGT Treasury as a material Transactions IGTE OMB IGT OMB / Federal Activity Business Issues weakness Exchange (IGTE) System Business Rules New IGT government System Pilot Pilot Ended Rules Released Instructions wide Launched Released Business Various policy - based Intragovernmental Business Process Enterprise DoD Activity efforts including Transactions IGTS IVAN Reengineering Architecture Standard Document System (IGTS) Pilot Ended Launched (End - to - End) (BEA) 3.1 Number Pilot Launched released OSD(C) OSD(C) & OSD(AT&L) OSD(BT) Defense Finance & DFAS DoD Program Ownership SCST TSO BTA BTA BTA Accounting establishes partner FMTT TP&R DPP DBSAE Service IGTS PMO (DFAS) Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) Directorates: Transformation Support Office (TSO) Directorates: Business Transformation Agency (BTA) Directorates: • OSD(C): Comptroller • FMTT: Financial Management Transformation Team • TP&R: Transformation Priorities and Requirements • OSD(AT&L): Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics • DPP: Directorate of Priority Projects • SCST: Supply Chain Systems Transformation • DBSAE: Defense Business Systems Acquisition Executive Solving problems associated with intra-governmental transfers is a long standing acquisition and financial management problem • History of OMB, Federal Civilian, and DoD efforts to address accounting and elimination issues • Series of recent IG audits pointed to a large number of potential Anti-Deficiency Act (ADA) violations • OMB continues to lead a government-wide effort to recommend a process/system solution for IGT • DoD’s efforts are an extension of the foundational work done by OMB and are playing a key role in defining a way forward

  5. Yr ADAs Source Status FY05 38 GSA Audit • 8 referred for formal investigation • 30 no violation FY06 69 GSA (12) NASA (14) Treasury (21) DOI (22) • 14 referred for formal investigation • 55 no violation FY07 386 DOI (338) NIH (42) VA (6) • 7 under review by OGC • 5 pending accounting correction • 17 referred for formal investigation • 357 no violation FY07 96 DOI IG identified cases • 3 under review by OGC • 93 no violations FY07 51 Military Services • 2 under review by OGC • 49 no violation Total 640 • 39 referred for formal investigation Recent audits directed by Congress identified potential Anti-deficiency Act (ADA) violations in DoD • Audits directed by the National Defense Authorization Act of FY 2005 to review procurement policies, procedures, and internal controls • NASA - Scientific and Engineering Workstation Procurement (SEWP) • Department of Treasury – FedSource • GSA – FTS (now FAS) • Department of Interior – GovWorks • National Institute of Health (NIH) • Department of Veteran’s Affairs (VA)

  6. The issues found on the buying side include a number practices that can be addressed through policy and automation • Buying organizations did not … • Certify funds availability before issuing MIPR • Document signature authority • Cite correct appropriation for type of purchase • Describe the purchase in accurate terms • Specify the required period of performance • De-obligate and retract funding no longer available

  7. The issues found on the selling side include a number practices that also can be addressed through policy and automation • Selling organizations … • Used DoD funds beyond expiration or period of availability • Failed to verify the existence of a bona fide need • Delivered goods and services in periods beyond the availability of funds • Made improper advances and expenses in the wrong periods

  8. Benefits Problems Capabilities Order information captured electronically & in a consistent manner Lack of visibility into the movement of funds Electronic link between buyers and sellers Detailed order information Anti-Deficiency Act violations (Parking funds, using expired funds) Accountability Accountability Visibility Visibility Visibility into Trading Partner Activity Buyer and Seller information (BPN & LOA) Uncollected funds ($2B+ year) Automated Bookings & LOA Validation Improved Financial Accounting/ Reporting Inability to properly account for, eliminate, and reconcile IGT transactions Buyer/Seller notifications prior to transfer of funds Full LOA to Accounting Systems to liquidate payables/receivables Increased Productivity Reduced Cost Manpower required to process and reconcile IGT transactions Efficiency Efficiency Access to centralized data for reporting Along with sound policy and processes, DoD is developing a system solution to address these issues Intra-governmental Value Added Network (IVAN)

  9. The IVAN proof-of-concept results show the opportunity to move away from “pay and chase” and towards “pay and process” • DoD to DoD proof-of-concept in 2007 showed that IVAN solution helps address several issues • Improves acquisition process/documentation • Improves financial process/documentation • Corrects process problems found in audits • The next step in 2008 is to validate transactions from DoD to Civilian Agencies • Begin processing proof-of-concept transactions with GSA and DoI • Incorporate additional Interagency acquisition requirements • Incorporate disbursement/collection requirements

More Related