1 / 18

-- wide wing -- long stinger

The diagram you produced on Page 4 of Cladistics:. OG E B A D C. -- black eye. -- long wing. -- wide neck. -- long leg -- dark body. -- large eye. -- thick leg -- wide body.

Solomon
Download Presentation

-- wide wing -- long stinger

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The diagram you produced on Page 4 of Cladistics: OG E B A D C -- black eye -- long wing -- wide neck -- long leg -- dark body -- large eye -- thick leg -- wide body The differences in the in-group are explained in 10 steps! Comma separation at one step might be clearer! -- wide wing -- long stinger Your cladogram probably uses numbered traits… I’m doing it this way for a reason…

  2. This diagram is based on the same clade critter data… But is not the result of cladistic analysis: OG E B A D C 25 Steps!! <-- black eye <-- long leg <-- dark body <-- wide neck <-- thick leg <-- wide body <-- long wing <-- large eye <-- wide wing <-- long stinger What concept was used to make this diagram? Scientists reject this diagram because of parsimony…why?

  3. This is likely your cladogram from Page 4 of Cladistics OG E B A D C -- black eye -- long wing -- wide neck -- long leg -- dark body -- large eye -- thick leg -- wide body -- wide wing -- long stinger

  4. F What do we do with the newly-discovered Clade Critter (page 5)? OG E B A D C -- black eye -- long wing -- wide neck -- long leg -- dark body -- large eye -- thick leg -- wide body -- wide wing -- long stinger

  5. F There are two possible explanations--which is most parsimonious? OG F B A D C -- dark bodyR -- black eye dark -- body -- long wing Two Forward Evolutions -- wide neck -- dark bodyR -- long leg -- dark body -- large eye A homoplasy of parallelism or… convergence -- thick leg -- wide body A single evolution But two reversals -- dark body -- wide wing -- long stinger Is it easier to evolve or to lose the characteristic?

  6. Reversal Homoplasy The Case of Tetrapods

  7. Tetrapod limbs are complex Ball joint at girdle (pectoral or pelvic) Proximal segment has one heavy bone Hinge joint at elbow or knee Distal segment has two bones for rotation of hand/foot Small cuboidal bones at wrist and ankle for flexibility of hand/foot position Long metacarpal/metatarsals for palm/instep Phalanges for the digits (fingers/toes)

  8. Tetrapod limbs are stereotypical The complex structures are shared among these tetrapods: Fishes (some are more plesiomorphic) Amphibians Reptiles Birds Mammals Conclusion: rather than evolving complex limb form and function separately and identically among all these groups of species (i.e., many homoplasies), the tetrapod leg design evolved just once in a common ancestor (i.e., more parsimonious)

  9. Forward evolution of a leg requires modification of: • Bones • Muscles • Connectives • Vascular Paths • Neural Paths Reversal of a complex trait is comparatively parsimonious Reversal could be just ONE point mutation in ONE gene that normally puts limb development into motion. Without the first step, the rest does not happen.

  10. Tetrapod evolution has been reversed multiple times! Thus, it must be easily done… i.e. is parsimonious Legless amphibians: caecilians Legless lizards: glass lizards Ajolote: mole lizards Snakes So some gene functioning early in tetrapod development can mutate (become defective), rendering some ancestral species (and its descendants) legless. All the rest of the tetrapod genes that had evolved to make the limbs, are made useless by this one mutation.

  11. Caecilians: terrestrial amphibians http://www.wildherps.com/images/herps/standard/017614_caecilian.jpg http://www.wildherps.com/images/herps/standard/017612_caecilian.jpg http://scienceblogs.com/zooillogix/caecilian.bmp

  12. A photo of parent Caecilian with offspring R635RmqosDI/AAAAAAAANYc/jwcNDv1suD4/flesh+eating+amphibian+caecilians%5B2%5D

  13. http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/gallery/albums/userpics/22445/normal_ajolote.jpghttp://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/gallery/albums/userpics/22445/normal_ajolote.jpg This ajolote is a snake that reversed the reversal blocking only pectoral limbs (note: belly scale pattern and limb location) Or it is a lizard that has reversed only its pelvic limbs

  14. There are also partial losses: the Boa has vestigial pelvic limbs http://www.edwardtbabinski.us/images/spurs1.jpg Of course the alternative interpretation is a partial reversal of loss

  15. There are several clear examples of reversals of reversals: http://dakotabirding.com/Snake_wlegs.jpg This snake has reversed the reversal blocking pectoral limbs

  16. This is another verified reversal of a reversal: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/wildlife/6187320/Snake-with-foot-found-in-China.html This snake has reversed the reversal blocking pelvic limbs

  17. Of course humans will make false claims! This claim of pectoral limbs is clearly false: http://robandjan.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/snake1.jpg This snake is in the act of swallowing a frog, NOT sprouting legs!

  18. F There are two possible explanations--which is most parsimonious? OG F B A D C -- dark bodyR -- black eye dark -- body -- long wing Two Forward Evolutions -- wide neck -- dark bodyR -- long leg -- dark body -- large eye A homoplasy of parallelism or… convergence -- heavy leg -- wide body A single evolution But two reversals -- dark body -- wide wing -- long tail Is dark body a complex characteristic? Maybe one enzyme!

More Related