impediment profiling for smoking cessation breaking down barriers to behavioral goals
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Impediment Profiling for Smoking Cessation: Breaking Down Barriers to Behavioral Goals

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 57

Impediment Profiling for Smoking Cessation: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 320 Views
  • Uploaded on

Impediment Profiling for Smoking Cessation: Breaking Down Barriers to Behavioral Goals. David L. Katz, MD, MPH, FACPM, FACP Director, Prevention Research Center Yale University School of Medicine Art & Science of Health Promotion Conference Las Vegas, NV March 23, 2006. Key References-.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Impediment Profiling for Smoking Cessation:' - Sharon_Dale


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
impediment profiling for smoking cessation breaking down barriers to behavioral goals

Impediment Profiling for Smoking Cessation:Breaking Down Barriers to Behavioral Goals

David L. Katz, MD, MPH, FACPM, FACP

Director, Prevention Research Center

Yale University School of Medicine

Art & Science of Health Promotion Conference

Las Vegas, NV

March 23, 2006

key references
Key References-
  • Katz DL. Behavior modification in primary care: the pressure system model. Prev Med. 2001;32:66-72
  • Katz DL, Boukhalil J, Lucan SC, Shah D, Chan W, Yeh MC. Impediment profiling for smoking cessation. Preliminary experience. Behav Modif. 2003;27:524-37
  • O\'Connell M, Lucan SC, Yeh MC, Rodriguez E, Shah D, Chan W, Katz DL. Impediment profiling for smoking cessation: results of a pilot study. Am J Health Promot. 2003;17:300-3
  • O\'Connell ML, Freeman M, Jennings G, Chan W, Greci LS, Manta ID, Katz DL. Smoking cessation for high school students. Impact evaluation of a novel program. Behav Modif. 2004;28:133-46
  • More papers in press
modifiable behaviors health
Modifiable Behaviors & Health
  • The leading “causes” of death are the “results” of risk factors
  • Nearly 50% of all deaths in the US each year are premature and related to modifiable behaviors
  • Tobacco, Diet, and Physical Activity patterns are the leading causes of premature death
          • McGinnis JM, Foege WH. Actual causes of death in the United States. JAMA. 1993;270:2207-12
          • Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA. 2004;291:1238-45
what behavior is
What Behavior Is
  • The “best” choice under prevailing circumstances/conditions
the challenge of change
The Challenge of Change
  • Moving out of a desired or valued pattern
  • Moving into a rejected, or unknown pattern
leading theories
Leading Theories
  • Theory of Reasoned Action
  • Health Beliefs Model
  • Social Cognitive Theory/Self-efficacy
  • Social Learning Theory/Locus of Control
  • Transtheoretical Model/Stages of Change & Processes of Change

Institute of Medicine. Health and Behavior: the Interplay of Biological, Behavioral, and Societal Influences.

National Academy Press. Washington, D.C. 2001

reasoned action
Reasoned Action
  • Consideration of pros and cons
  • Choice based on options and values
health belief model
Health Belief Model
  • Must believe he/she is susceptible
  • Must perceive the potential seriousness
  • Must believe that benefits outweigh the costs and inconvenience
  • Must believe he/she is capable
  • There must be a “cue to action”
transtheoretical model
Transtheoretical Model
  • Stages of Change
  • Processes of Change
stages of change
Stages of Change
  • Precontemplation
  • Contemplation
  • Preparation
  • Action
  • Maintenance/Lapse
  • Termination

Prochaska J, DiClemente C. Psychotherapy: Theory, Res, Pract. 1982;19:276-288

processes of change
Processes of Change
  • Consciousness Raising
  • Dramatic Relief
  • Self-Reevaluation
  • Environmental Reevaluation
  • Self-Liberation
  • Helping Relationships
  • Counterconditioning
  • Contingency Management
  • Stimulus Control
  • Social Liberation

Prochaska JO, Redding CA, Evers KE. The Transtheoretical Model and Stages of Change. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK (eds). Health Behavior and Health Education. Theory, Research, and Practice. 2nd edition. Jossey-Bass, Inc. San Fancisco, CA. 1997.

getting there requires the right m o
Getting There Requires the Right “M/O”
  • M = maximizing motivation
  • O = overcoming obstacles
        • Katz DL. Behavior Modification in Primary Care: the Pressure System Model. Prev Med. 2001;32:66-72
motivational interviewing
Motivational Interviewing

General Principles:

  • 1) express empathy / acknowledge ambivalence
  • 2) develop discrepancy
  • 3) avoid argumentation
  • 4) roll with resistance
  • 5) support self-efficacy
  • 6) encourage social contracting

Miller WR. Addict Behav. 1996;21:835-42; Rollnick S. Int J Obes Relat Metabl Disord. 1996;20suppl1:s22-6

slide14

Increase Physical Activity

Maintain Current Activity Level

Advantages

Advantages

Weight loss

Easy

Better health

Comfortable

Avoid risk of injury

More energy

Avoid sweating

Disadvantages

Hard work

Disadvantages

No weight loss

Limited time

No health benefits

Unsure how

Possible weight gain

Decision Balance for Physical Activity. Cells in the balance show some hypothetical entries.

overcoming resistance
Overcoming Resistance
  • Acknowledge obstacles
  • Convert obstacles into challenges/opportunities
    • Identify/surmount universal barriers
    • Identify/surmount patient-specific barriers
the inspiration for ip
The Inspiration for IP-
  • How stone many walls with no windows or doors does it take to impede your progress?
study team prevention research center
Study Team: PREVENTION RESEARCH CENTER

David L. Katz, MD, MPH, FACPM, FACP Project PI

Meghan O’Connell, MPH Project Coordinator

Sean Lucan Research Assistant

YSM*4

Ming-Chin Yeh, PhD Research Associate

Wendy Chan, MPH Data Analyst

*Yale Medical School

purpose
PURPOSE
  • To establish a reliable means of identifying and quantifying the diverse impediments to smoking cessation in an individual
  • To demonstrate that smoking cessation interventions tailored to individual

impediment profiles increase one and two- year quit rates

background
BACKGROUND
  • Cigarette smoking is the leading cause of preventable death in the U.S.
  • The literature suggests that there are 7 commonly identified impediments to smoking cessation: nicotine dependence; stress; anxiety; depression; chemical codependency;concern about weight gain; and the presence of at least one smoker in the household
methods
METHODS

Survey Design

  • Comprehensive screening tools were developed to identify and quantify impediments by fusing items from existing and newly developed questionnaires
  • Validated instruments were located for nicotine dependence, stress, anxiety, and depression.
  • Multi-item questionnaires for assessing chemical dependency and concern about weight gain were developed from surveys used in clinical practice.
  • A single, direct question used to assess the presence of household members who smoke
recruitment
Recruitment

Inclusion criteria:

-smoking history > 1 year

-current smoking > 15 cigarettes per day

-resident of Lower Naugatuck Valley, CT.

-> 18 years of age

Exclusion criteria:

-current use of nicotine replacement products

-allergy to study medications, history of seizures

-participation in other cessation program

-uncompensated medical problems

intervention applications
Intervention Applications
  • Nicotine dependence
    • Subjects meeting criteria on the Fagerstrom scale were given bupropion, for a total of 12 weeks started 2 weeks prior to target quit date
    • Subjects received transdermal nicotine replacement therapy for 10 weeks starting on the quit date (2 weeks into program)
  • Co-morbid chemical dependencies
    • -Subjects meeting CAGE score criteria were evaluated by an addictions specialist and referred to a Chemical Dependency Program
intervention applications cont
Intervention Applications, Cont.
  • Anxiety
    • Subjects meeting criteria on the Beck Anxiety Inventory received the anxiolytic, buspirone, for 8 weeks. Therapy started 2 weeks prior to quit date.
  • Depression
    • Subjects meeting Beck Depression Inventory criteria were referred for psychiatric evaluation, with treatment on the basis of professional discretion.
  • Smoking by household member
    • Subjects with family/household members who smoke were invited to family group counseling dinner meetings.
intervention applications cont28
Intervention Applications, Cont.
  • Stress
    • Subjects meeting criteria on the Simple Stress and Tension Test were enrolled in a stress- management program consisting of yoga, guided relaxation, and meditation conducted weekly throughout the year-long program.
  • Weight management
    • Subjects meeting “Smoking Situations Scale” criteria enrolled in four 1-hour dietary counseling sessions.
    • Organized walking groups met 3 times per week for 20 minutes, for a period of one month.
    • Discounted membership to YMCA for subsequent 3 months.
results
RESULTS

N=19 Percentage of subjects with impediments:

results cont
Results, Cont.
  • No significant difference in the proportions of participants that quit smoking between males and females at the significance level of 0.05. (p=0.9)
  • Insufficient evidence to suggest that any single impediment predicts quit status
conclusions
Conclusions
  • This novel approach resulted in 42% and 26% quit rates at one and two years respectively, a significant improvement over best quit rates reported in literature.
  • Targeting therapies for each of the 7 commonly reported impediments to quitting smoking may have resulted in the high quit rates achieved in the study.
conclusions cont
Conclusions, Cont.
  • Independent of quit rate, profiling impediments to smoking cessation served to identify otherwise ignored health problems meriting treatment in their own right.
  • The further study of impediment profiling as a smoking cessation adjunct in larger, longer, and randomized trials is warranted.
worksite study
Worksite Study-

To replicate the promising results of a

pilot study using an approach to

smoking cessation termed “impediment

profiling” in the worksite setting

background36
Background
  • Cigarette smoking is the leading cause of preventable death in the U.S.1
  • The CDC’s Community Guide to Preventive Services recommends smoking cessation interventions be made available2
  • Worksites as an important venue3
  • Potential benefits to both employees and employers3
  • Novel “Impediment Profiling” methods applied in a community hospital setting
methods37
Methods

PLANNING

  • Community hospital/PRC partnership for planning and implementation
    • administration, human resources, outpatient psychiatry, dietary, volunteer services depts.
  • Promotion of program for manager/supervisor buy-in
  • Hospital/PRC resource sharing
methods cont d
Methods (cont’d)

RECRUITMENT

  • All smoking employees were invited to participate via internal email, flyers, informational sessions for each department, information provided with employee benefits package, letters sent to all employees
methods cont d39
Methods (cont’d.)

IMPLEMENTATION

  • Use of Impediment Profiling (IP) instrument (previously validated) for barrier identification
  • Assignment to interventions as indicated by measurement scales:
    • NRT; treatment for anxiety/depression; dietary counseling and PA for weight gain prevention; stress reduction; family support groups; referral to treatment of chemical co- dependencies
methods cont d40
Methods (cont’d.)
  • Specific intervention components were…
  • Self-reported quit status was verified with measurement of carbon monoxide (CO) concentration in expired air
  • Smoking cessation was defined as CO reading of < 10ppm.
slide41

Results

  • 55 enrolled
  • 4 dropped out prior to study commencement, resulting in sample of 51 employees
  • 88% of participants had previously attempted to quit
  • Stages of Change survey indicated subjects were in the following stages at baseline: 8% precontemplative

69% contemplative

23% action

conclusions47
Conclusions
  • This study achieved a 39% one-year quit rate, replicating pilot findings indicating that IP and tailoring of interventions results in a dramatic improvement over quit rates reported in the literature
  • Seventy-seven percent of participants were in either the precontemplative or contemplative “stage of change” at enrollment, suggesting that providing individualized assistance may be highly effective at increasing/maintaining motivation to quit
conclusions cont d
Conclusions (cont’d)
  • Independent of quit rate, profiling impediments to smoking cessation served to identify otherwise ignored health problems meriting treatment in their own right
  • Further study of impediment profiling as a smoking cessation adjunct in larger, longer, and randomized trials is warranted
conclusions cont d49
Conclusions (cont’d)
  • The study demonstrated the feasibility of applying IP methods in a worksite setting
  • Hospitals in particular are ideal settings for smoking cessation interventions. By capitalizing on existing resources and involving stakeholders, creative programs can be implemented to benefit the entire workforce
i have a dream
I have a dream…
  • Impediment profiling for all: web-based
  • Mapping individualized paths to behavior change
  • Application to eating/weight control…
bibliography
Bibliography

1. Centers for Disease Control. (2000). Reducing Tobacco Use: A Report of the Surgeon General. MMWR, 49(RR16), 1-27.

2. Cohen, S. (1983). The Perceived Stress Scale: A Global Measure of Perceived Stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385-396.

3. Creamer, M., Foran, J., & Bell, R. (1995). The Beck Anxiety Inventory in a Non-Clinical Sample. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 33(4), 477-485.

4. French, S., Jeffrey, R., Klesges, L., & Forster, J. (1995). Weight Concerns and Change in Smoking Behavior Over Two Years in Working Population. American Journal of Public Health, 85, 720-722.

5. Freund, M. (1992). Predictors of Smoking Cessation: The Framingham Study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 135, 957-964.

6. Ginsberg, D., Hall, S., & Rosinski, M. (1991). Partner Interaction and Smoking Cessation: A Pilot Study. Addictive Behaviors, 16, 195-202.

7. Glassman, A., Helzer, J., Covey, L., Cottler, L., Stetler, J., Tipp, J., & Johnson, J. (1990). Smoking Cessation and Major Depression. JAMA, 264, 1546-1549.

8. Heatherton, T., Kozlowski, L., Frecker, R., & Fagerstrom, K. (1991). The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence: A Revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. British Journal of Addiction, 86, 1119-1127.

9. Hilleman, D., Mohiuddin, S., Core, M. D., & Sketch, M. (1992). Effect of Buspirone on Withdrawal Symptoms Associated with Smoking Cessation. Archives of Internal Medicine, 152, 350-352.

10. Jeffery, R., Hennrikus, D., Lando, H., Murray, D., & Liu, J. (2000). Reconciling Conflicting Findings Regarding Post-Cessation Weight Concerns and Success in Smoking Cessation. Health Psychology, 19(3), 242-246.

bibliography cont
Bibliography, cont.

11. Keuthen, N., Niaura, R., Borrelli, B., Goldstein, M., DePue, J., Murphy, C., Gastfriend, D., Reiter, S.R., & Abrams, D. (2000). Comorbidity, Smoking Behavior and Treatment Outcome. Psychother Psychosom, 69(5), 244-250.

12. Niaura, R, Shadel W. Response to social stress, urge to smoke, and smoking cessation. Addict Behav,27(2),241-50.

13. Roski, J., Schmid, L., & Lando, H. (1996). Long-Term Associations of Helpful and Harmful Spousal Behaviors With Smoking Cessation. Addict Behav, 21(2), 173-185.

14. Saitz, R., Lepore, M., Sullivan, L., Amaro, H., & Samet, J. (1999). Alcohol Abuse and Dependence in Latinos Living in the United States: Validation of the CAGE (4M) Questions. Arch Intern Med, 159(7), 718-724.

15. Weekley, C. (1992). Smoking as a Weight-Control Strategy and its Relationship to Smoking Status. Addict Behav, 17(3), 259-271.

16. Whisman, M., Perez, J., & Ramel, W. (2000). Factor Structure of the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) in a Student Sample. J Clin Psychol, 56(4), 545-551.

bibliography cont53
Bibliography, cont.

17.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs-August 1999. Atlanta GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, August 1999.

18. Wasserman, M.P. 2001. Guide to Community Preventive Services: State and local opportunities for tobacco use reduction. American Journal of Preventive Medicine: 20 (S2) pp 8-9.

19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Making Your workplace Smoke-free: A decision makers guide. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, Wellness Councils of America and American Cancer Society.

bibliography54
Bibliography

1. Centers for Disease Control. (2000). Reducing Tobacco Use: A Report of the Surgeon General. MMWR, 49(RR16), 1-27.

2. Cohen, S. (1983). The Perceived Stress Scale: A Global Measure of Perceived Stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385-396.

3. Creamer, M., Foran, J., & Bell, R. (1995). The Beck Anxiety Inventory in a Non-Clinical Sample. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 33(4), 477-485.

4. French, S., Jeffrey, R., Klesges, L., & Forster, J. (1995). Weight Concerns and Change in Smoking Behavior Over Two Years in Working Population. American Journal of Public Health, 85, 720-722.

5. Freund, M. (1992). Predictors of Smoking Cessation: The Framingham Study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 135, 957-964.

6. Ginsberg, D., Hall, S., & Rosinski, M. (1991). Partner Interaction and Smoking Cessation: A Pilot Study. Addictive Behaviors, 16, 195-202.

7. Glassman, A., Helzer, J., Covey, L., Cottler, L., Stetler, J., Tipp, J., & Johnson, J. (1990). Smoking Cessation and Major Depression. JAMA, 264, 1546-1549.

8. Heatherton, T., Kozlowski, L., Frecker, R., & Fagerstrom, K. (1991). The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence: A Revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. British Journal of Addiction, 86, 1119-1127.

9. Hilleman, D., Mohiuddin, S., Core, M. D., & Sketch, M. (1992). Effect of Buspirone on Withdrawal Symptoms Associated with Smoking Cessation. Archives of Internal Medicine, 152, 350-352.

10. Jeffery, R., Hennrikus, D., Lando, H., Murray, D., & Liu, J. (2000). Reconciling Conflicting Findings Regarding Post-Cessation Weight Concerns and Success in Smoking Cessation. Health Psychology, 19(3), 242-246.

bibliography cont55
Bibliography, cont.

11. Keuthen, N., Niaura, R., Borrelli, B., Goldstein, M., DePue, J., Murphy, C., Gastfriend, D., Reiter, S.R., & Abrams, D. (2000). Comorbidity, Smoking Behavior and Treatment Outcome. Psychother Psychosom, 69(5), 244-250.

12. Niaura, R, Shadel W. Response to social stress, urge to smoke, and smoking cessation. Addict Behav,27(2),241-50.

13. Roski, J., Schmid, L., & Lando, H. (1996). Long-Term Associations of Helpful and Harmful Spousal Behaviors With Smoking Cessation. Addict Behav, 21(2), 173-185.

14. Saitz, R., Lepore, M., Sullivan, L., Amaro, H., & Samet, J. (1999). Alcohol Abuse and Dependence in Latinos Living in the United States: Validation of the CAGE (4M) Questions. Arch Intern Med, 159(7), 718-724.

15. Weekley, C. (1992). Smoking as a Weight-Control Strategy and its Relationship to Smoking Status. Addict Behav, 17(3), 259-271.

16. Whisman, M., Perez, J., & Ramel, W. (2000). Factor Structure of the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) in a Student Sample. J Clin Psychol, 56(4), 545-551.

bibliography cont56
Bibliography, cont.

17.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs-August 1999. Atlanta GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, August 1999.

18. Wasserman, M.P. 2001. Guide to Community Preventive Services: State and local opportunities for tobacco use reduction. American Journal of Preventive Medicine: 20 (S2) pp 8-9.

19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Making Your workplace Smoke-free: A decision makers guide. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, Wellness Councils of America and American Cancer Society.

may you be inspired often and expire late thank you

May you be inspired often (and expire late).Thank you.

Yale Prevention Research Center

130 Division St.

Derby, CT 06418

(203) 732-1265

[email protected]

www.davidkatzmd.com

ad