Baptist confessions theology
Download
1 / 35

Baptist Confessions Theology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 238 Views
  • Updated On :

Baptist Confessions & Theology. Copyright 2007 NOBTS, Rex D. Butler and Lloyd A. Harsch. Purpose. Clarify Baptist teachings to others Inform and Educate their own members Provide a basis for fellowship Deal with Controversy Baptists use confessions of faith, not creeds

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Baptist Confessions Theology' - Samuel


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Baptist confessions theology l.jpg

Baptist Confessions& Theology

Copyright 2007 NOBTS, Rex D. Butler and Lloyd A. Harsch


Purpose l.jpg
Purpose

  • Clarify Baptist teachings to others

  • Inform and Educate their own members

  • Provide a basis for fellowship

  • Deal with Controversy

  • Baptists use confessions of faith, not creeds

    • Creed is an officially binding statement that one must believe


Common points l.jpg
Common Points

  • Religious liberty for all

    • Formed in the crucible of persecution

    • Appealed to nature of faith

      • Cannot be coerced

      • Must be voluntary or is meaningless

    • Practical arguments

      • Freedom leads to more peaceful and stable society

      • Persecution harms both state and church

    • Magistrate had authority only in civil matters


Common points4 l.jpg
Common Points

  • Reliability and authority of scripture

    • Did not develop theories of how inspiration worked

    • Basis for fellowship

      • Particular Baptists emphasized doctrine as basis for fellowship

      • General Baptists emphasized experience as basis for fellowship


Common points5 l.jpg
Common Points

  • Church composed of visible saints voluntarily assembled and baptized

    • All believers formed the invisible church

    • General Baptists viewed congregations as local units of the larger church

    • Particular Baptists viewed each congregation as complete and independent


Common points6 l.jpg
Common Points

  • Pastors served life-time pastorates unless move agreed upon by both congregation and pastor

  • Baptism is for believers only

  • Communion gradually moved from closed to open

  • Required spontaneity in worship

  • Evangelistic



General baptists l.jpg
General Baptists

  • Declaration of Faith (1611)

    • Issued by Thomas Helwys’ congregation


General baptists9 l.jpg
General Baptists

  • Faith and Practice of Thirty Congregations (1651)

    • Issued by an association

    • First GB confession to represent more than one church

    • Rejects free will unaided by God (art. 25)

    • Makes oblique reference to immersion (art. 48)

      • “Go into the water, and to be baptized”


Slide10 l.jpg

General Baptists

  • Standard Confession (1660)

    • Issued by the denomination

    • First GB confession to specify immersion

    • Includes laying on of hands (art. 12) - six principles of Heb 6:1-2:

      • Repentance, faith, baptism, laying on of hands, resurrection of the dead, eternal life

  • Orthodox Creed (1678)

    • Adds a third office of messenger who oversees congregations in an area and plants churches



Particular baptists l.jpg
Particular Baptists

  • First London (1644)

  • 1646 revision

    • Submitted to Parliament seeking legal toleration

    • Less antagonistic to Parliament

    • Clarified religious liberty and role of magistrate

    • Strengthened Calvinism

      • Puts them in line with Presbyterians in Parliament

    • Reduced ministry to pastors and deacons like General Baptists


Particular baptists13 l.jpg
Particular Baptists

  • Somerset Confession (1656)

    • Written by Thomas Collier

    • Response to Quakers

    • Represents earliest attempt to bring together Particular & General Baptists


Particular baptists14 l.jpg
Particular Baptists

  • Second London (1677, revised 1688/89)

    • Written by Benjamin Keach

    • Modifies the Westminster Confession (Presbyterian-1647) & Savoy Confession (Independent-1658)

    • First confession to use “infallible” about Bible (chap 1.1)

    • Baptism is sign of fellowship, not sign and seal of covenant of grace


Particular baptists15 l.jpg
Particular Baptists

  • Second London

    • Introduces covenant of grace (chap 7.2-3)

    • Possibility of elect being saved without the gospel (chap 10.3)

    • If not elect, nothing can be done about it (chap 10.4)



Slide17 l.jpg

CALVINISM

Total Depravity

Unconditional Election

Limited Atonement

Irresistible Grace

Perseverance of the Saint

ARMINIANISM

Positive View of Humanity

Conditional Election

Unlimited Atonement

Resistible Grace

Falling from Grace

  • Emphases of Each System

    • Calvinism emphasizes God’s providential control

    • Arminianism emphasized human free will & responsibility to obey

    • “For by grace you have been saved through faith” (Eph. 2:8) – Calvinists emphasize grace; Arminians, faith


History of arminianism l.jpg
History of Arminianism

Jacob Arminius (1560-1609)

  • Dutch pastor & theologian, trained under Calvin’s successor, Theodore Beza

  • In debate over predestination, Arminius came to reject this Calvinist doctrine

  • Calvinists accused Arminius & his followers of heresy

  • After Arminius’ death, Arminians were condemned at Synod of Dort (1619), fined, deposed, exiled, beheaded

  • 1610, followers described his views in Remonstrance


Arminian theology l.jpg
Arminian Theology

  • Unlimited Atonement

    • Also called General Atonement

    • Christ died for all humans (Heb. 2:9; 1 Jn. 2:2)

    • Anyone who believes in him can be saved

    • Universal redemption, not universal salvation: Jesus died for all sin & sinners, but only believers are forgiven


Arminian theology20 l.jpg
Arminian Theology

  • Conditional Election

    • God determined in eternity that persons believing in Christ will be saved

    • Faith is condition of election

    • Grace is still divine basis of election


Arminian theology21 l.jpg
Arminian Theology

  • Conditional Election

    • Understood in terms of God’s foreknowledge(electing those he knows will believe) instead of predestination(God’s determining who will believe)


Arminian theology22 l.jpg
Arminian Theology

  • Positive View of Humanity

    • Higher view of human free will after fall

    • Compatible with God’s sovereignty

    • Human cannot save himself or herself without God’s grace

    • Fallen humanity can do nothing good without being “born again of God in Christ, through his Holy Spirit, and renewed in understanding, inclination, will, and all his power, in order that he may rightly understand, think, will, and effect what is truly good”

    • All persons are able to believe or to meet the conditions of salvation

      • Prevenient grace is given by God to all persons, so everyone is capable of accepting God’s offer of salvation


Arminian theology23 l.jpg
Arminian Theology

  • Resistible Grace

    • God’s Spirit shows the truth of the Word & enables belief but can be rejected

    • Every person has genuinely free will

    • For human will to be genuinely free, person must be allowed to make independent moral decision

  • Possible to Fall from Grace

    • It is possible for one who once believed to reject, or fall from, God’s saving grace (Heb. 6:4-6)


History of calvinism l.jpg
History of Calvinism

John Calvin (1509-64)

  • Systematic theologian of Reformation: Institutes of the Christian Religion

  • Sovereignty of God

    • God’s purposes are unquestionable & unchangeable

  • Total depravity of humanity

    • Every individual is sinful & unable to respond to God’s offer of grace

  • From eternity, God has predestined some to salvation, others to destruction


History of calvinism25 l.jpg
History of Calvinism

Theodore Beza (1519-1605)

  • Calvin’s successor at Geneva

  • Developed doctrine of limited atonement – Christ shed his blood only for sins of the elect

  • Opposed idea that Great Commission was still in effect


History of calvinism26 l.jpg
History of Calvinism

Synod of Dort (1618-19)

  • Called to deal with Remonstrants & Arminian theology

  • Defined strict Calvinism using Beza’s interpretation of Calvin’s theology

  • Codified “TULIP” – five points of Calvinism vs. Arminianism


Tulip l.jpg
TULIP

  • Total Depravity

  • Unconditional Election

  • Limited Atonement

  • Irresistible Grace

  • Perseverance of Saints


Total depravity l.jpg
Total Depravity

  • Doctrine is linked to original sin

  • Every human is utterly sinful & can do nothing morally good in his or her own power (Rom. 3:10-12)

  • Individual is incapable of initiating salvation experience (John 6:44)


Unconditional election l.jpg
Unconditional Election

  • In eternity, God elected some to salvation (Eph. 1:4-6) & chose others for damnation

    • Calvin taught Double Predestination

    • Augustine taught Single Predestination

  • God’s election is based only on his sovereign will, not on basis of merit or foreknowledge


Limited atonement l.jpg
Limited Atonement

  • Also called Particular Atonement

  • Christ died only for the Elect

  • Otherwise, part of his blood would have been shed in vain, in violation of God’s economy


Irresistible grace l.jpg
Irresistible Grace

  • Elect will be drawn irresistibly to God by his Holy Spirit

  • Spirit will cause elect to affirm their election

  • Irresistible grace results in elect believing in Christ & performing good works


Perseverance of the saints l.jpg
Perseverance of the Saints

  • Elect will persevere in salvation until end (John 10:29)


Theological extremes l.jpg
Theological Extremes

  • Calvinism

    • Hyper-Calvinism

      • Overly emphasized election

      • To share the Gospel with those not surely elect is more than futile; it is disobedient

    • Antinomianism

      • Exaggeration of doctrines of atonement & justification by faith

      • Whatever the elect do, it is not sin

    • Universalism

      • Conclusion that God elected everyone


Theological extremes34 l.jpg
Theological Extremes

  • Arminianism

    • Arianism

      • Optimistic anthropology led to weak Christology

      • Salvation of humans did not require Christ to be fully divine

    • Socinianism

      • Christ was good man & prophet but not God

      • Works-oriented salvation

    • Unitarianism

      • Rejected traditional Trinity as illogical

      • Atonement was an example of how people should obey God (cf. Peter Abelard’s Moral Example Theory of Atonement)

    • Universalism

      • Doctrine of universal atonement led to conclusion that all would be saved


ad