Virtual neighborhoods architecture of online communities
Download
1 / 23

Virtual Neighborhoods Architecture of Online Communities - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 218 Views
  • Updated On :

Virtual Neighborhoods Architecture of Online Communities . Reuven Aviv Zippy Erlich Gilad Ravid [email protected] http://www.ravid.org/gilad. Agenda. Introduction Design, Mechanisms, Architecture Method Results. Design of network. mechanisms. Social Interdependence theory.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Virtual Neighborhoods Architecture of Online Communities ' - Roberta


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Virtual neighborhoods architecture of online communities l.jpg

Virtual Neighborhoods Architecture of Online Communities

Reuven Aviv

Zippy Erlich

Gilad Ravid

[email protected]

http://www.ravid.org/gilad


Agenda l.jpg
Agenda

  • Introduction

  • Design, Mechanisms, Architecture

  • Method

  • Results


Slide3 l.jpg

Design of network

mechanisms

Social Interdependence theory

Matching the predictions of network emergence theories

Architecture

Content Analysis

Network statistical analysis of Markov models

Collaborative Knowledge construction


Sna viewpoints l.jpg

Global SNA

Macro

Cohesiveness

Equivalence (role groups)

Power of actors

Range of influence

Brokerages

Local SNA

Micro

Statistical

Dyads and triads

SNA viewpoints

Aviv, R., Erlich, Z., Ravid, G., & Geva, A. (2003). Network Analysis of Knowledge Construction in Asynchronous Learning Networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks


The social capital mechanism l.jpg
The Social Capital Mechanism

  • Hunt for Knowledge (social capital)

    • Using efficient interactions

    • E.g. bridging others

  • Community works with broadcast medium:

    • Most efficient connection: No interactions

      • Passive members (Lurkers)


Slide7 l.jpg

Cognitive balance

Emergence of transitive triads

cohesiveness

cliques

Creation of knowledge support


Slide8 l.jpg

  • The architecture of a network can be describes in terms of three components

    • One or more relations are the fundamental glue between the actors

    • A partition of the actors and the relations into 2 level hierarchy of groups of actors

    • A set of mechanisms shaping the relations to the creation of the neighborhood


Virtual neighborhoods l.jpg

link three components

In star

Mutual dyad

Mix star

Out star

Virtual Neighborhoods

Transitive triad

Cyclic triad


Method of analysis l.jpg
Method of Analysis three components

  • Reveal Architectural Components

  • Identify Relevant Theories

  • Identify Mechanisms


Method l.jpg
Method three components

  • Analyze the recorded responsiveness data of two online forums of learners with different design


Example two communities l.jpg
Example: Two Communities three components

  • 16 weeks each; 19, 18 participants

  • Parts of Open U “Business Ethics” Course

  • Team community

    • Designed for Knowledge Construction

    • Tested positively by Content Analysis

  • Forum Community

    • Designed for support by Q & A


Social capital transaction costs l.jpg
Social Capital & Transaction Costs three components

  • Burt 1992, 2002

  • Bridge over Holes with minimal cost

  • Few single links

  • link<0

  • Supported for both networks


Collective action l.jpg
Collective action three components

  • Coleman, 1973, 1986; Marwell & Oliver 1993; Fulk et al. 1996

  • Inducements to contribute under peer pressure

  • Respond to several others

  • If large density & centralization & size then out star > 0

  • Supported for team network.

  • Not supported for forum network because condition in not fulfilled


Exchange l.jpg
Exchange three components

  • Willer & Skvoretz, 1997; Hommans, 1958

  • Exchange resources directly, depending on partner & network status

  • Tendency to reciprocate to resource promising partners

  • mutuality > 0

  • Not supported for team network because there are no a-priory resource promising actors

  • supported for Forum network because Tutor is a-priory resource promising actors


Generalized exchange l.jpg
Generalized exchange three components

  • Bearman, 1997

  • Exchange resources via mediators, depending on partner & network states

  • Tendency to respond cyclically to resource promising partner

  • cyclicity > 0

  • Not supported in both networks. Probably because no need for information exchange via mediators


Contagion exposure l.jpg
Contagion Exposure three components

  • Burt 1980; Contractor et al., 1990

  • Leading to social influence & limitation in attitudes, knowledge & behavior

  • Respond to same as other equivalent actors

  • Out star > 0; in star > 0; mixed star >0; transitivity >0

  • Not supported in both networks. Probably because contagion process could not develop in the short lifetime of networks


Cognitive consistency l.jpg
Cognitive Consistency three components

  • Heider 1958; Festinger, 1957; Cartwright et al., 1956

  • Drive for balance in cognitions

  • Respond via several paths

  • transitivity > 0

  • Supported in team networks. Not supported in the forum network. In both networks this is due to their designs


Uncertainty reduction l.jpg
Uncertainty reduction three components

  • Berger 1987

  • Reduce uncertainty by gaining

  • Attract responses from several others

  • In star > 0

  • Not supported in both networks. In the forum network the tutor clarified all uncertainties


Exogenous factors l.jpg
Exogenous factors three components

  • Residual personal tendencies o respond or trigger only to actors with pre assigned roles

  • For students (1)resp=0; (2)trigg=0; For tutor (3)resp>0; (4)trigg>0

  • 1,2 supported for both networks; 3 un supported for team network, supported for forum network; 4 un supported for both networks


Thank you l.jpg

Thank You three components

Questions? Comments? Remarks ?


ad