1 / 29

Ethical Implications of Legalizing Recreational Marijuana

Ethical Implications of Legalizing Recreational Marijuana. Heidi Keating Master of Public Health, Medical College of WI Faculty Advisor: Dr. Thomas May April 2016. Purpose. As of April 2016, recreational marijuana is legal in 4 states plus Washington DC Colorado, Washington, Oregon, Alaska

Rita
Download Presentation

Ethical Implications of Legalizing Recreational Marijuana

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ethical Implications of Legalizing Recreational Marijuana Heidi Keating Master of Public Health, Medical College of WI Faculty Advisor: Dr. Thomas May April 2016

  2. Purpose • As of April 2016, recreational marijuana is legal in 4 states plus Washington DC • Colorado, Washington, Oregon, Alaska • Marijuana is classified as a Schedule I drug (great potential for harm and no medicinal value) and remains illegal at the federal level • States allowed to determine how to proceed without interference from federal law enforcement • Use a public health ethics framework to examine the issue of legalizing recreational marijuana

  3. Public Health Ethical Framework • Framework influenced by Beauchamp and Childress’ four principles widely used in biomedical ethics • Autonomy: the right of an individual to make his/her own choice • Beneficence: acting with the best interest of the other in mind • Non-maleficence: above all do no harm • Justice: fairness and equality among individuals (Aldcroft, Adrian) • Framework has 3 sections to guide decision-making in order to reach the best possible solution and public health goals • Analysis • Harm related to the issue • Public health goals • Legal scope, stakeholders, and professional code of ethics

  4. Public Health Ethical Framework • Framework • Evaluation-Using ethical standards and 4 principles • Utility-balance of benefits over harm • Rights-respect for individual • Justice-benefits and burdens distributed fairly • Common Good-serve the community and not just a few • Virtue/Respect for public institutions-respect of self and civic roles and values • Justification of the decision • Effectiveness—will the public health goals be achieved with this option? • Proportionality-will benefits outweigh infringed morals? • Necessity—is it necessary to override conflicting ethics to achieve goals? • Least infringement-is the action the least intrusive and the least restrictive? (Bernheim)

  5. Methods/Research • Research on drug use • National Institute for Drug Abuse • Health and Human Services • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention • Harvard School of Public Health • Research on drug policy • London School of Economics; Expert group on the economics of drug policy • Drug Policy Alliance • Smart Approaches to Marijuana • Ethicists and economists • John Stuart Mill • Milton Friedman • Gerald Dworkin • Joel Feinberg • Doug Bandow

  6. Data • Using data to determine the type of harm related to marijuana use • States and voters face complex decisions around marijuana • Is it safe enough to legalize for recreational use? • Will adolescent use increase? • Will adult use increase? • Is the war on drugs effective?

  7. Data • Independent scientific committee on drugs used multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to score 20 drugs on 16 criteria-9 related to individual harm, 7 related to harm to others

  8. Data: Youth • Marijuana use rates for adolescents from Monitoring the Future Study

  9. Data: Adults • Colorado use rates: 13.6% according to Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance Survey • From 2010-2014 use rates have remained steady, moving up and down a percentage point between 11% and 13.7% according to the National Survey of Drug Use and Health • Gallup polls report 11% of US adults are current users in 2015, up from 7% in 2013 • 44% of Americans have tried marijuana according to Gallup (2015)

  10. Analysis: Public Health Goals • Healthy People 2020 • Reduce substance abuse to protect the health, safety, and quality of life for all, especially children • To achieve health equity, eliminate disparities, and improve the health of all groups • Drug Policy Alliance • Drug policy should cause the least possible harm and the greatest possible benefit • World Health Organization • Prevention and reduction of the negative health and social consequences of psychoactive substance use • Assessment of psychoactive substances so as to advise the United Nations with regard to their regulatory control

  11. Analysis: Stakeholders • Pro Legalization • Recreational users • Advocacy groups to reform drug laws to include legalization, taxation, regulation, and education • NORML • Drug Policy Alliance • Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP) • 58% of the American Public • Support Prohibition • Federal government • Rocky Mountain High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area • Certain states • Community coalitions to prevent youth substance youth

  12. Analysis: Professional ethics • In 2002, American Public Health Association adopted “Principles of Ethical Practice of Public Health” • 10 principles that reflect values and purpose of the public health profession including: • PH should address causes of disease, requirements for health, and prevent adverse health outcomes. • Achieve community health in a way that respects the rights of the individual • Work for the empowerment of disenfranchised community members • Implement effective policies and programs that protect and promote health • Provide information • Incorporate a variety of approaches that respect diversity

  13. Evaluate: Utility • Utilitarian approach aims to produce the greatest balance of good over harm • “Good” is based on human welfare, pleasure over pain. Expanded to include personal satisfaction and monetary benefits • Utility considers the impact of harm • John Stuart Mill is credited with the harm principle: prevent harm to others

  14. Evaluate: Utility (con’t) • Philosopher Joel Feinberg established criteria for harm including: • Magnitude of harm—is the harm a criminal violation or personal interest? • Probability of harm—how dangerous is the activity? • Aggregative harms—notion of banning something that is harmful to some but enjoyable to others. • Marijuana use is a criminal violation for many as current laws stand. One of the greatest harms is not use but criminalization • Use has risk. About 9% of adults who use become addicted, and increase to 17% if use starts during adolescence

  15. Evaluate: Utility (con’t) • Teenage use has greatest risk • Negative correlations with grades, college graduation rates, life satisfaction, learning impairment, memory loss, decreased motivation and linkages to schizophrenia • Teenagers have the greatest access to marijuana from the black market • Harm associated with the marketplace • Comparisons to alcohol and tobacco industries • Market to youth • Legalization could make product safer • Regulation • Taxation • Education

  16. Evaluate: Rights • A rights approach protects an individual’s ability to determine what to do with one’s life • Many advocacy groups believe legalization is mostly about rights • Rights advocates suggest legalization will not cause widespread harm and there is no proof that it does • Burden of proof should be on those who would make it illegal

  17. Evaluate: Rights • Many consider drug use to be dangerous, addictive and harmful • But there are other activities that fit that criteria such as sky diving, gambling, or driving a car • “Adults are entitled to ingest substances even if a majority view that decision foolish.” -John Stuart Mill • “Too much of our policy about illegal drug use is based on generalizations from worst-case scenarios that do not conform to the reality of typical drug use.” –Doug Bandow

  18. Evaluate: Rights • Paternalistic government intervention, or using the law to interfere with a person’s liberty for his own good • Paternalism often justified to prevent harm to self, whereby laws are enacted in which individuals give up their autonomy in an effort to keep society safe and ordered • Difference between paternalism and harm to others: Consent • Harm to others principle forbids A from imposing harmful drug to B without B’s consent. If B consents, it is ok for A to give or sell harmful drug • Paternalism: forbids A from delivering dangerous drug to B whether or not B consents

  19. Evaluate: Justice • Determines if people are treated equally or proportionately • According to the American Civil Liberties Union, blacks are 3.73 times more likely than whites to be arrested for marijuana possession • A criminal conviction can make it difficult to: • Vote • Obtain educational loans • Get a job • Obtain housing

  20. Evaluate: Justice • History of marijuana laws and policy • Fear of Mexican Immigrants during the Great Depression • Reefer Madness, 1936 propaganda film • Suggesting adolescents who smoke marijuana would descend into madness • Marijuana causes violence, insanity, sex crimes • War on Drugs • Strengthen laws and penalties against illegal drugs • Research showed marijuana did not cause people to use harder drugs • Increased incarceration rates

  21. Evaluate: Common Good • The best policies that serve the community as a whole, not just some members • Communities are entitled to local control where marijuana is legal • Laws should protect citizens • In a liberal society, government does not need to interfere in what law abiding competent adults can or can’t do as long as there is no harm to others

  22. Evaluate: Common Good • Laws based on morality • Murder, rape, theft, fraud • Immoral because of harm to others • Is marijuana prohibition based on morality? • Why is marijuana immoral? • Many users find pleasure in the experience • Why is it ok to experience pleasure from alcohol but wrong to experience pleasure from marijuana?

  23. Evaluate: Respect for Public Institutions • Public health as an institution and judging the public health action (prohibition vs legalization) in relation to professional and civic roles • Does the institution demonstrate values such as honesty,transparency, trustworthiness • Role of public health after legalization: • Assessment—monitoring patterns of use, prevalence of use and health effects • Policy development—regulation to protect public health and safety. Includes mass education and prevention efforts • Assurance—ensuring a competent workforce including educating healthcare workers, developing screening tools and evaluation of public risk

  24. Justification • Effectiveness of public health goals • Status quo will not reach public health goals • Experts have suggested solutions • IF public health is willing to try new innovative tools • Proportionality • Benefits of reform may include less for non-violent drug use, reduced prison population, increase in state revenue • Necessity • Reform is necessary because the war on drugs has produced negative outcomes • There needs to be a shift from pitting morality and health (prohibition) against liberty and safety (reform) (Kleiman)

  25. Justification • Laws should be the least restrictive and the least intrusive • Prohibition is neither • Legalization puts more restrictions on youth access

  26. Discussion & Conclusion • Public health goals and legalization are not mutually exclusive • The time for marijuana reformation is now • Do not need to use alcohol and tobacco as the model • Public health ought to promote innovative approaches to reform • Current laws are unjust • Current laws do not protect minors • Use does not automatically mean abuse • Individuals have a right to make their own decisions including what they ingest • Reformation ought to promote the greatest good for the greatest number • Communities should have local control

  27. References • Aldcroft, A. (2012, July 13). Measuring the four principles of Beauchamp and Childress. Retrieved March 12, 2016, from Biomed Central: http://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcseriesblog/2012/07/13/measuring-the-four-principles-of-beauchamp-and-childress/ • American Civil Liberties Union. (2015). Marijuana Arrests Numbers. Retrieved March 2, 2016, from ACLU: https://www.aclu.org/gallery/marijuana-arrests-numbers • American Public Health Association. (2014, Nov 18). Regulating Commercially Legalized Marijuana as a Public Health Priority. Retrieved March 12, 2016, from American Public Health Association: http://www.apha.org/policies-and-advocacy/public-health-policy-statements/policy-database/2015/01/23/10/17/regulating-commercially-legalized-marijuana-as-a-public-health-priority • Bandow, D. (2012). From Fighting the Drug War to Protecting the Right to Use Drugs. In F. McMahon, Towards a Worldwide Index of Human Freedom (pp. 254-280). Canada: Fraser Institute. • Bernheim, R. G. Ethics in Public Health Practice and Management. In C. B. Lloyd F. Novick (Ed.), Public Health Administration (Second ed., pp. 149-160). Jones and Bartlett Publishers. • Bonde, S., & Firenze, P. (2013, May). A Framework for Making Ethical Decisions. Retrieved Feb 28, 2016, from Brown University: https://www.brown.edu/academics/science-and-technology-studies/framework-making-ethical-decisions • Caulkins, J. P. (2014). Effects of Prohibition, Enforcement and Interdiction on Drug Use. London School of Economics and Political Science, Expert Group on the Economics of Drug Policy. LSE Idea. • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016, Jan 12). Data Search Substance Abuse. Retrieved Jan 11, 2016, from HealthyPeople2020: http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/data-search/Search-the-Data/page/3/0?nid=&items_per_page=10&pop=&ci=&se=&f%5B%5D=field_topic_area%3A3500 • Doyle, J., Evins, E., Miron, J., Grant, I., & McKinley, S. J. (2014, Oct 8). Legalizing Marijuana: The Public Health Pros and Cons. The Forum at Harvard School of Public Health Legalizing Marijuana: The Public Health Pros and Cons. (S. Malone, Interviewer, & S. Malone, Editor)

  28. References • Drug Policy Alliance. (2015). 10 Facts about marijuana. Retrieved Feb 14, 2016`, from Drug Policy Allicance: http://www.drugpolicy.org/resource/10-facts-about-marijuana • Drug Policy Alliance. (2015). Drug War Statistics. Retrieved Feb 14, 2016, from Drug Policy Alliance: http://www.drugpolicy.org/drug-war-statistics • Dworkin, G. (1968). Paternalism. conference, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Philosophy. • Feinberg, J. (1986). Balancing Harms. In J. Feinbert, Harm to Self. Oxford University Press. • Feinberg, J. Legal Paternalism. In J. Feinberg, Harm to Self. Oxford: University Press. • Friedman, M., & Paige, R. (1991). Interview with Milton Friedman on the Drug War. (A. D. Forum, Producer, & PBS) Retrieved Feb 22, 2016, from Schaffer Library of Drug Policy: http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/misc/friedm1.htm • Frontline. (1998, April). Frontline: Busted: Americas War on Marijuana. Retrieved March 2, 2016, from PBS: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/dope/etc/cron.html • Gallup polls. (2015, Oct 21). Back legal marijuana. Retrieved Feb 27, 2016, from Gallup: http://www.gallup.com/poll/186260/back-legal-marijuana.aspx • Ghosh, T. M., Van Dyke, M. P., Maffey, A. M., Whitley, E. R., & Gilliam-Ross, L. P. (2016). The Public Health Framework of Leagalized Marijuana in Colorado. Journal of the American Public Health Association, 106, 21-26. • Gostin, L. O. (2008). Public Health Law Duty, Power, Restraint. Berkley, CA, USA: University of CA Press. • Guttmannova, K., Lee, C. M., Kilmer, J. R., Fleming, C. B., Rhew, I. C., Kosterman, R., et al. (2015, Dec 21). Impacts of Changing Marijuana Policies on Alcohol Use in the United States. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research .

  29. References •  Health and Human Services. (2016, Feb 12). Substance Abuse. Retrieved Feb 13, 2016, from Healthy People 2020: http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/substance-abuse • Holsinger, K. (2015, Dec 7). Consequentialist vs. non-consequentialist theories of ethics. Retrieved Feb 28, 2016, from University of Conneticut Ecology and Evolutionary Biolgoy: http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/eeb310/lecture-notes/value-ethics/node3.html • Kleiman, M. A. (2014). Lawful Access to Cannabis: Gains, Losses and Design Criteria. London School of Economics and Political Science, Expert Group on the Economics of Drug Policy. LSE Ideas. • Kuvadia, A. (2015, April). 21 influential medical organizations that support marijuana reform. Retrieved March 12, 2016, from RYOT.org: http://www.ryot.org/21-influential-medical-organizations-support-legalization-medical-marijuana/929010 • London, R. (2005, July 1). Harvard Law Today. Retrieved Feb 14, 2016, from Is the War on Drugs Succeeding: http://today.law.harvard.edu/feature/war-drugs-succeeding/ • LSE Expert Group on the Economics of Drug Policy. (2014). Ending the Drug Wars. London School of Economics and Political Science , Expert Group on the Economics of Drug Policy. LSE Ideas. • Madras, B. K. (2010). Office of National Drug Control Policy A scientist in drug policy in Washington DC. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1187 (Addiction Reviews 2), 370-402. • World Health Organization. (2016). Substance Abuse. Retrieved Feb 14, 2016, from World Health Organization: http://www.who.int/topics/substance_abuse/en/

More Related