Cultural and educational issues in english for academic purposes
Download
1 / 24

Cultural and Educational Issues in English for Academic Purposes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 395 Views
  • Uploaded on

Cultural and Educational Issues in English for Academic Purposes. Zuzana Talašová, Janka Bačínská, Peggy Huppert. 0. What is Culture?. Products literature folklore art music artefacts Ideas Behaviours beliefs customs values habits

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Cultural and Educational Issues in English for Academic Purposes' - Renfred


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Cultural and educational issues in english for academic purposes l.jpg
Cultural and Educational Issues in English for Academic Purposes

Zuzana Talašová, Janka Bačínská, Peggy Huppert


0 what is culture l.jpg
0. What is Culture? Purposes

Products

literature

folklore

art

music

artefacts

Ideas Behaviours

beliefs customs

values habits

institutions dress

foods

leisure

(Tomalin/Stempleski)


I discourses c ommunities and c ultures l.jpg
I. Discourses, PurposesCommunities and Cultures

  • Writing disciplines are distinguished by:

    ▪specialized subject areas

    ▪ diversity of topics

    ▪methodologies

    ▪ways of seeing the world which characterizes them


Slide4 l.jpg

  • k Purposesnowledge produced by the academy is usually in written language

  • large spoken academic corpus is now becoming available

  • disciplinary variation raises a number of key issues


Discourse and k nowledge c onstruction l.jpg
Discourse and PurposesKnowledge Construction

  • learning a discipline implies learning to use language in disciplinary approved ways

  • the key concepts of a discipline are defined through and by language

  • learning a discipline thus means learning to communicate as a member of a community


The f ocus on a cademic w riting l.jpg

L Purposesilis (2001) calls it ‘essayist literacy’, reflects a gate-keeping role and the importance it has in representing academic knowledge

Bourdieau (1991) forms this as it is seen to be a guarantee of objectivity and truth

The Focus on Academic Writing


Social constructivism l.jpg
Social Constructivism Purposes

  • theory that knowledge is created through the discourses of social communities

  • knowledge does not result from objective descriptions of what the world is really like, but emerges in part through our perceptions

  • understanding is always filtered through beliefs


Opinion of physicists l.jpg

Hawkin Purposes(1993) notes a theory may describe a range of observations, but beyond that it makes no sense to ask if it corresponds to reality, because we don’t know what reality is independent of

Rotry (1979) says that knowledge is the social justification of belief

Opinion of Physicists


Ii discourse communities l.jpg
II. Discourse Communities Purposes

  • social constructivism tells us that the intellectual climate in which academics live and work determines the problems they investigate

  • the community-based orientation to literacy focuses on the importance of writing and speaking, and learning to write and speak as an insiderof the community


The concept of community l.jpg

Swales Purposes(1990) defined these communities as having collective goals and purposes

Barton (1994) suggests they can be loose knit groups engaged in either the reception or production of texts, or both

The concept of community


Slide11 l.jpg

  • Discourse community Purposeshelps to join writers, texts and readers together and, irrespective of how we define the idea, it is difficult to see how we might do without it. Essentially, it draws together a number of key aspects and contexts that are crucial to the ways spoken and written discourse is produced and understood.


Cutting 2002 points out l.jpg
Cutting Purposes(2002) points out:

▪Situational context:what people „know about what they can see around them“

▪Background knowledge context: what people know about the world, what they know about the aspects of life and what they know about each other

▪Co-textual context: what people „know about what they have been saying“


Task 2 l.jpg
Task 2 Purposes

  • Could you identify the discourse communities you are a member of?

  • How central is your participation in each one?


Iii the i nfluence of c ulture l.jpg
III. The PurposesInfluence of Culture

  • culture influences how students expect to write and speak in the academy, but also the ways of writing and speaking they bring with them from their home environments


Language and l earning are c losely b ound up w ith c ulture l.jpg
Language and PurposesLearning are Closely Bound up With Culture

  • culture is a controversial notion, with no single agreed definition, one version sees it as a historically transmitted and systematic network of meanings which allow us to understand, develop and communicate our knowledge and beliefs about the world (Lantolf, 1999)


Differences in o rganizing our u nderstanding l.jpg
Differences in PurposesOrganizing our Understanding

▪different linguistic proficiencies and intuitions about language

▪different learning experiences and classroom expectations

▪different sense of audience and self as a text producer

▪different preferences for ways of organizing texts

▪different writing, reading and speaking processes

▪different understandings of text uses and the social value of different text types


Slide17 l.jpg

  • One important element in EAP classrooms is the potential for culturally divergent attitudes to knowledge to influence students’ language production and how we understand students’ progress

  • Culture can also intrude into learning through students’ expectations about instruction and the meanings they give to classroom tasks


One potential problem area is that of peer review l.jpg
One Potential Problem Area is That of Peer Review: culturally divergent attitudes to knowledge to influence students

  • Asking students to respond to their classmates’ writing is generally seen as beneficial in L2 instruction, but while it may help to some learners to envisage their audience more effectively, peer evaluation has been criticized as inappropriate for learners from collectivist cultures.


Carson and nelson 1996 l.jpg
Carson and Nelson (1996): culturally divergent attitudes to knowledge to influence students

  • Chinese students often avoid criticism of peers and so provide no useful feedback (collectivism)


Iv education l.jpg
IV. Education culturally divergent attitudes to knowledge to influence students

  • ideal: bilingual education

  • culture studies

  • interaction

  • collaborative teaching

  • cultural mismatches


Iv education21 l.jpg
IV. Education culturally divergent attitudes to knowledge to influence students

  • knowledge of linguistic, social, cultural criticism

  • curriculum

  • “one size fits all” ?

  • lingua franca or tyrannosaurus rex?


Slide22 l.jpg

(F culturally divergent attitudes to knowledge to influence studentslowerdew/Peacock)


Common core hypothesis l.jpg
Common Core Hypothesis culturally divergent attitudes to knowledge to influence students

  • common set of linguistic structures and vocabulary

  • problems:

    • incremental language learning?

    • finite number of elements?

    • variety of language? (connotations)


Bibliography l.jpg
Bibliography culturally divergent attitudes to knowledge to influence students

  • Barry Tomalin and Susan Stempleski: “Cultural Awareness”. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.

  • Penny Adams, Brian Heaton and Peter Howarth (eds.): “Socio-Cultural Issues in English for Academic Purposes.” London and Basingstoke: Macmillan Publishers Linited, 1993.

  • Ken Hyland: “English for Academic Purposes.“ London and New York: Routledge, 2006.

  • Andy Gillett: “Intercultural Communication.“ available via: <http://www.uefap.com/articles/arena.htm>

  • Mark W. La Celle-Peterson and Charlene Rivera: “Is it Real for All Kids? A Framework for Equitable Assessment Policies for English Language Learners.“ available via <http://ceee.gwu.edu/Products_ELLs/IsitReal.pdf>

  • John Flowerdew and Matthew Peacock: “Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes.“ available via <http://assets.cambridge.org/052180/1303/sample/0521801303ws.pdf>

  • Ronald Carter and David Nunan (eds.):“The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of other Languages.“ available via <http://assets.cambridge.org/97805218/01270/sample/9780521801270ws.pdf>


ad