The HAP Standard 2009-2010 Review Highlights Monica Blagescu [email protected] “making humanitarian action accountable to beneficiaries “. Why review the Standard and The Guide?. To reflect learning from application to date To incorporate emerging good practice
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
HAP Board and GA
EndorsementThe review process
Main steps so far
“it challenges agencies to address power imbalances between aid workers and communities”
“it breaks down accountability to affected populations into distinct and logically-linked parts”
“First attempt to meaningfully go beyond voluntarism and set up quality benchmarks that are monitored”