slide1
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Science Advocacy Committee Oregon Chapter of the Society for Neuroscience

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 44

Science Advocacy CommitteeOregon Chapter of the Society for Neuroscience - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 460 Views
  • Uploaded on

Science Advocacy Committee Oregon Chapter of the Society for Neuroscience.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Science Advocacy CommitteeOregon Chapter of the Society for Neuroscience' - Pat_Xavi


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

Science Advocacy Committee

Oregon Chapter of the

Society for Neuroscience

slide2

Scientists share (with doctors) the top spot in the Harris poll of occupations having the most prestige; engineers are about in the middle of this ranking. Most Americans say they would be happy if their son or daughter chose a career in science

www.nsf.gov/statistics

slide3

www.nsf.gov/statistics

People Value Science

  • Surveys found that S&T ranked 10th of 14 categories of news followed most closely by the public in 2004.
  • In 2004, 83% of Americans surveyed agreed that "even if it brings no immediate benefits, scientific research that advances the frontiers of knowledge is necessary and should be supported by the federal government."
  • Opposition to medical research that uses stem cells from human embryos has declined. In 2004, 36% of those surveyed said they were opposed to this type of research, down from 51% in 2002.
slide7

Diabetes cure

Parkinson’s

Alzheimer’s

Heart disease

Cancer

AIDS

slide8

www.nsf.gov/statistics

People Don’t Understand Science

  • Science knowledge in the United States is not improving. Survey respondents\' ability to answer most questions about science has remained essentially unchanged since the 1990s (exception: antibiotics).
  • In 2004 surveys, more than half of the respondents agreed that "we depend too much on science and not enough on faith," that "scientific research these days doesn\'t pay enough attention to the moral values of society."
  • Less than half the American population accepts the theory of evolution.
slide9

www.nsf.gov/statistics

US

China

South Korea

Malaysia

EU

slide11

www.nsf.gov/statistics

US

China

Japan

South Korea

EU

Americans believe they should know more.

slide12

www.nsf.gov/statistics

  • Americans express strong support for science and technology.
  • They are not very well informed about these subjects.
  • Implications?
  • good citizenship
  • evaluate the validity of various claims they encounter in daily life
  • level of government support for research
  • miracle cures (& other mystical or illogical thinking)
slide13

Role of Government in the Role of Science in Society

Federal agencies for promoting scientific research and science-based policies:

Science

Environmental Protection Agency

Advisory Committees

Food & Drug Administration

Center for

Disease Control

Legislators

National Institutes

of Health

Public Policy

slide16

Federal Advisory Committee Act

Advisory committees are to be “fairly balanced in terms of the points of view represented” and advice should “not be inappropriately influenced by the appointing authority or by any special interest.”

Durbin Amendment

Prohibits use of federal funds to ask candidates for appointment to scientific advisory committees to disclose their voting history, political affiliation, or opinions on unrelated political topics.

(http://www.apa.org/ppo/issues/durbinamdtdebate.html

http://durbin.senate.gov/record.cfm?id=247933&&)

Restore Scientific Integrity to Federal Research & Policy Making Act (HR 839) 2/16/05

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h109-839

slide18

Pandemic flu?

Increased from 1.4-2.4% of budget in 2 years – Road Map Initiatives

slide19

Large decrease in non-competing grants

Modest increase in competing grants (+ applications from people with terminating grants in 2007)

Net decrease of 642 grants

Biomedical inflation rate = 3.7%/year

NIMH will pay up to the 10th percentile & half of grants between 11th and 20th percentile

slide20

“To keep America competitive, one commitment is necessary above all: We must continue to lead the world in human talent and creativity… Tonight I announce an American Competitiveness Initiative, to encourage innovation throughout our economy, and to give our nation\'s children a firm grounding in math and science…I propose to double the federal commitment to the most critical basic research programs in the physical sciences over the next 10 years.”

1/31/06

www.whitehouse.gov

slide21

American Competitiveness Initiative from White House – calls for 7.8% increase in FY2007 for NSF & 14% increase for DOE

AAAS R&D Budget and Policy Program:

Overall federal investment in research and development (R&D) would increase to $137 billion in FY 2007 (1.9 % above this year’s funding level; 2.2 % needed to keep pace with projected inflation).

NIH budget would be flat for the second year in a row—with spending power losing ground to inflation—and would fund less than 1 out of every 5 grant applications.

slide22

On Monday, February 7th, President Bush submitted to Congress his budget recommendations for the Fiscal Year 2007 (FY 07). In it, he proposes to fund NIH at $28.587 billion, the same funding level as the FY 06 budget. The new budget continues to erode the gains made from the doubling period (1998-2003).

slide23

Harkin-Specter Amendment

Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA)

March 17 2006 – passed in Senate (73-27) – to increase NIH funding by $7 billion (Smith & Wyden voted in favor)

Will it pass in the House? Call your rep!

slide24

Other champions

Acknowledges the importance of neuroscience research and Brain Awareness Week (3/17/06)

Congressman Patrick Kennedy (D-RI)

After doubling the NIH budget, did we get what we paid for? Let’s not step backwards.

See Brain Research Success Stories (www.sfn.org)

slide25

Summary

Scientists have authority

Their work has the potential to positively affect public health

The authority of science may be abused for ideological purposes

Scientists should participate in presenting their knowledge

In this fiscally-competitive environment, we must speak up for neuroscience research

slide26

Acknowledgements

Bobby Heagerty, Paul Cordo, Anthony Oliva, Samantha Chirillo, Rebecca Hammond, Judy Cameron, Lillian Pubols, Jim Newman, Bryan Boehringer, Christa Helms, Ted Benice, Helen Kamens, Tina Gremel, Philippa Bayley, Skyla Herod, Elinor Sullivan, Shane Durrant, Mike Kaplan, Ethan Beckley, James Brady, Lauren Milner, Larry Sherman, Lee Robertson, David Morton, Alex Stevens, Trish Pruis, Kyle Ambert, Ellen Walker, Kristin McCarthy, Matthew McGinley, Adam Miller, Kim Cronise, Raphael Pinaud

slide27

Mission Statement(10-26-03)

Informlegislators and other policy makers about new scientific knowledge and recent developments in neuroscience research and their implications for public policy, societal benefit and continued scientific progress.

EducateOregon neuroscientists about the value, relevance, and techniques involved in communicating with elected officials.

Collaboratewith other Oregon organizations, universities, colleges, institutes, and companies to provide a unified and effective voice for promoting neuroscience.

Demonstratethe benefit of neuroscience research to the public through science outreach activities, communication strategies, and other educational opportunities to engage and mobilize their support.

slide28

2005 Activities

Capitol Hill Advocacy

Christa Helms, Bobby Heagerty, Helen Kamens, Ethan Beckley, Philippa Bayley, Ted Benice, Tina Gremel, Alex Stevens, Lee Robertson, Elinor Sullivan, Brenda McKee, David Morton, James Brady, Lauren Milner

Ron Wyden

Gordon Smith

David Wu

Peter DeFazio

Earl Blumenauer

Darlene Hooley

Greg Walden

slide29

Capitol Hill Day

April 26, June 7, July 26 and September 13

The Capitol Hill Day program seeks to strengthen the communication between scientists and their Representatives in Congress. Participants will also attend a briefing of the Congressional Biomedical Research Caucus. (travel awards!)

http://www.jscpp.org/output.cfm?ID=153

slide30

Actions

Join the Science Advocacy Committee

JSCPP Capitol Hill Day

Call your representative

Educational outreach

slide32

2004 Activities

SfN OR Chapter - Salishan

Samantha Chirillo, Rebecca Hammond, Bobby Heagerty,

Paul Cordo, Anthony Oliva

Public Advocacy Panel

slide34

2004

Neuroscience Town Hall

Bobby Heagerty, Anthony Oliva, Christa Helms

Neuroscience Research

slide35

2005

Neuroscience Town Hall

Bobby Heagerty, Samantha Chirillo

Stem Cells – Oregon Stem Cell Center

Photo by Anne Ryback

slide36

2006

Neuroscience Town Hall

Bobby Heagerty, Christa Helms, Trish Pruis

From Bench to Bedside

slide41

Presentations

“First Steps to Translating Your Research”

Judy Cameron – Vollum (2004)

Christa Helms, Rebecca Hammond, Bobby Heagerty, Skyla Herod, Judy Cameron, Jim Newman

Primate Center Advocacy Presentation (2005)

Bobby Heagerty, Ted Benice, Tina Gremel, Skyla Herod, Christa Helms

Neuroscience Graduate Program Advocacy Presentation – Seaside (2005)

Helen Kamens, Philippa Bayley

slide43

Poll Shows Majority of Americans Support Animal Research

http://www.fbresearch.org/Journalists/Polls/HartGraph2005_01.htm

slide44

www.fbresearch.org

Increase in number and severity of attacks by eco and animal extremists in the last 25 years (2.2.06)

11 indicted on charges including arson, allegedly participating in a campaign of domestic terrorism in five Western states for Earth Liberation Front and Animal Liberation Front

ad