School improvement and restructuring under differentiated accountability
Download
1 / 80

School Improvement and Restructuring under Differentiated Accountability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 88 Views
  • Uploaded on

School Improvement and Restructuring under Differentiated Accountability. Lake County Cheryl L. Sattler, Ph.D Ethica, LLC. No Child Left Behind. Passed 2001, law 2002 “Due” for renewal 2007 Renewal (reauthorization) timing uncertain New regulations coming in November

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'School Improvement and Restructuring under Differentiated Accountability' - Pat_Xavi


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
School improvement and restructuring under differentiated accountability

School Improvement and Restructuring under Differentiated Accountability

Lake County

Cheryl L. Sattler, Ph.D

Ethica, LLC


No child left behind
No Child Left Behind Accountability

  • Passed 2001, law 2002

  • “Due” for renewal 2007

  • Renewal (reauthorization) timing uncertain

  • New regulations coming in November

  • Lots of changes - “pilots”


School in need of improvement status
School In Need of Improvement Status Accountability

  • Under NCLB, only Title I schools are SINI

    REQUIREMENTS:

    • School receives Title I-A funds for 2 years

    • School fails to make AYP for EACH of those 2 years

    • If School receives Title I-A funds the next year, it is a school in need of improvement

      EXAMPLE:

    • 2004-2005 – Title I-A + No AYP

    • 2005-2006 – Title I-A + No AYP

    • 2006-2007 – Title I-A School in Need of Improvement, Year 1 (SINI-1)


Under differentiated accountability
Under Differentiated Accountability… Accountability

  • All schools must make AYP

  • Only Title I schools are still SINI

  • Both Title I and non-Title I schools are graded

  • Accountability applies to all schools


Core of nclb title i
“Core” of NCLB = Title I Accountability

  • Testing

    • Grades 2-8, plus 1 high school grade

    • Reading, Math, Science

    • Florida adds Writing

  • Accountability (Adequate Yearly Progress)

  • School and District Improvement


Schools in need of improvement
Schools in Need of Improvement Accountability

  • SINI 1 = 2 years of no AYP

  • SINI 2 = 3 years of no AYP

    Corrective Action

  • SINI 3 = 4 years of no AYP

    Planning for Restructuring

  • SINI 4 = 5 years of no AYP

    Restructuring

  • SINI 5 = 6 years of no AYP

  • SINI 6+


When is sini status calculated
When is SINI Status Calculated? Accountability

  • After FCAT

  • Status takes effect DAY 1 of NEXT school year

  • Example: Dolphin Elementary is a SINI-3 this school year (2006-07). If it fails to make AYP based on 2006-07 FCAT scores, it will become a SINI-4.


Holding pattern
“Holding Pattern” Accountability

  • If a SINI makes AYP for ONE year, it stays at the same level.


Exiting sini
Exiting SINI Accountability

  • If a SINI makes AYP for TWO consecutive years, it exits improvement status.



Interpreting benchmarks
Interpreting Benchmarks Accountability

  • Percentage of students “at or above grade level” across the whole school

  • Levels 3 and above

  • For this past FCAT, school needed to have 58% of students at level 3 or above for reading; 62% for math

    • All students

    • Each subgroup (Econ. Disadvantaged, SWD, LEP, etc.)


Writing the exception
Writing…The Exception Accountability

  • Not an “absolute” benchmark

  • 1% improvement from prior year


Science
Science Accountability

  • Not included in AYP


3 ways to make ayp
3 Ways to Make AYP Accountability

  • “Straight Math” - Meet all benchmarks for all subgroups

  • Safe Harbor

    • Reduce non-proficient by 10%

  • Growth Model

    • Percent of students “on track” within 3 years


School report cards
School Report Cards Accountability

  • Overall AYP Report

    • http://schoolgrades.fldoe.org

  • Detailed Report = Key to planning

    • Scores for each subgroup

    • Other indicators

    • Safe Harbor, if applicable

    • Growth Model, if applicable


Example clermont elementary
Example: Clermont Elementary Accountability

  • Made AYP in reading for “all students”

  • Missed AYP for Hispanic students by 7 points (51 vs. 58)

  • Most important statistic: 49% NOT proficient (100-51=49)

  • If increase proficiency by 4.9% in next year, will make safe harbor.


Sini status
SINI Status Accountability

  • Not included on School Report Card

  • http://www.fldoe.org/bsa/title1/pubs_data.asp


New in 2008 2009 differentiated accountability
New in 2008-2009: Differentiated Accountability Accountability

  • Combines Federal and State accountability

  • Distinguishes between schools with minor and major problems

  • Federal pilot project - 6 states

  • New guidelines (July 29)

  • Federal evaluation


9 focus areas
9 Focus Areas Accountability

  • School Improvement Planning

  • Leadership

  • Educator Quality

  • Professional Development

  • Curriculum Alignment & Pacing

  • Continuous Improvement Model

  • Choice with Transportation

  • Supplemental Educational Services

  • Monitoring


5 new categories
5 New Categories Accountability



Across the state
Across the State Accountability


Correct ii means
Correct II Means… Accountability

  • School and District implement state-directed interventions


School improvement planning
School Improvement Planning Accountability

  • School provides extended day or after school programs

  • Parent compacts*

  • Systematic problem-solving process

  • District develops District Improvement, Assistance, and Intervention Plan

  • Reorganize/refocus District staff that support non-performance areas

  • District provides TA in analyzing student data, revising school budgets


Leadership
Leadership Accountability

  • School reviews/replaces members of leadership team with district assistance “as necessary”

  • District reviews/hires qualified principal with experience turning around similar school

  • Leadership team have success in similar setting

  • District provides “professional partner”

  • District uses state resources in leadership development


Educator quality
Educator Quality Accountability

Teachers highly qualified, certified

  • Paraprofessionals highly qualified

  • Student support services personnel highly qualified*

  • Student support services personnel have similar setting experience

  • School does not have a higher percentage of first-year or out-of-field teachers than model Title I schools*

  • No teachers “in need of improvement”

  • Fully staffed by day 1

  • Reading and Math/Science coaches provided


Educator quality1
Educator Quality Accountability

  • Lead teachers for each “grouping” hired or assigned by school, district assistance/state oversight “as necessary”

  • Staff reviewed for proof of accelerated student achievement – replace/reassign

  • Performance appraisals based primarily on achievement (including principal)

  • Performance appraisals of leadership team include achievement goals for targeted subgroups

  • District trains on performance appraisal

  • District provides pay for performance

  • District participates in school performance appraisal process at the school (sample)


Educator quality2
Educator Quality Accountability

  • District prioritizes resources for staffing, implements differentiated pay, uses state educator recruitment resources

  • District ensures school compliance with staffing requirements, provides TA, ensures mid-year vacancies filled

  • District reassigns teachers as needed

  • District ensures HR is appropriately staffed

  • District may declare “emergency” to suspend collective bargaining agreements


Professional development
Professional Development Accountability

  • IPDPs target needs of subgroups missed

  • Mentoring/coaching by highly effective teacher

  • ILPDs include PD targeting subgroups missed

  • PD plan meets state protocol standards

  • Equitable access to technology & PD

  • District provides TA on each of the above

  • District PD plan meets state protocol standards


Professional development1
Professional Development Accountability

  • School schedule designed to include:

    • Common planning time

    • Job-embedded PD

  • School organized into Professional Learning Communities

  • PLCs aligned with district-focused delivery model

  • Teachers of targeted subgroups organized into Lesson Study Groups

  • District ensures resources for above

  • District provides PD on assessing student progress


  • Professional development2
    Professional Development Accountability

    • Real-time access to achievement data with PD and support

    • District participates in IPDP meetings

    • Focused PD delivery model

      • Assignment of/training for content experts to serve as lead teachers

      • Assignment/training for PLC/LSC coaches


    Curriculum alignment pacing
    Curriculum Alignment & Pacing Accountability

    • School implements state-approved evidence-based curriculum program

    • Implement pacing guides

    • Implement schoolwide reform model

    • 90 minute uninterrupted reading block (elem.)

    • Ensure secondary students properly placed in rigorous coursework (District monitors)

    • District supports and identifies best practices

    • District defines instructional model to be followed in all classrooms (reported to state)


    Continuous improvement model
    Continuous Improvement Model Accountability

    • Administer diagnostics and provides remediation, acceleration & enrichment

    • Develop, implement curriculum calendar

    • District provides progress monitoring tools & analyzes data to determine effectiveness of instruction, allocate resources based on need

    • School implements Response to Intervention

    • Real-time access to student achievement data

    • District prescribes formative and summative assessments


    Choice and ses
    Choice and SES Accountability

    • Offer both Choice and SES


    Monitoring
    Monitoring Accountability

    • SAC monitors implementation of improvement plan

    • School team – monitors fidelity, defines roles

    • Comprehensive monitoring process – classroom, team, schoolwide

    • District monitors/evaluates improvement

    • District evaluates PD

    • District evaluates progress monitoring 3x/year (PMRN and core content)


    Restructuring
    Restructuring Accountability

    • District reorganizes school staff

    • District increases oversight and monitoring

    • District replaces school staff relevant to failure of the school (as necessary)


    And… Accountability

    • District appoints an outside expert to advise the school on its progress toward making AYP based on its school improvement plan



    Prevent ii means
    Prevent II Means… Accountability

    • District develops plans in collaboration with school, approves, monitors implementation

    • District develops District Improvement, Assistance, and Intervention Plan

    • District provides TA in analyzing student data, revising school budgets


    Prevent ii means1
    Prevent II Means… Accountability

    • District directs intervention

    • District provides assistance


    School improvement planning1
    School Improvement Planning Accountability

    • District develops plan in collaboration w/school

    • District approves/monitors implementation

    • District Improvement, Assistance and Intervention Plan

    • District provides TA in analyzing data and revising budgets


    Leadership1
    Leadership Accountability

    • School reviews/replaces members of leadership team “as necessary”

    • District reviews/hires qualified principal

    • District provides “professional partner”

    • District uses state resources in leadership development


    Educator quality3
    Educator Quality Accountability

    Teachers highly qualified, certified

    • Paraprofessionals highly qualified

    • Student support services personnel highly qualified*

    • Student support services personnel have similar setting experience

    • School does not have a higher percentage of first-year or out-of-field teachers than district average

    • Performance appraisals based primarily on achievement (including principal)

    • District trains on performance appraisal


    Educator quality4
    Educator Quality Accountability

    • District ensures performance appraisal implemented with fidelity

    • School reviews/replaces all relevant staff as necessary

    • District prioritizes resources for staffing, implements differentiated pay, uses state educator recruitment resources


    Educator quality5
    Educator Quality Accountability

    • District ensures school compliance with staffing requirements, provides TA, ensures mid-year vacancies filled

    • District reassigns teachers as needed

    • District ensures HR is appropriately staffed

    • District may declare “emergency” to suspend collective bargaining agreements


    Professional development3
    Professional Development Accountability

    • IPDPs target needs of subgroups missed

    • Mentoring/coaching by highly effective teacher

    • ILPDs include PD targeting subgroups missed

    • PD plan meets state protocol standards

    • Equitable access to technology & PD

    • District provides TA on each of the above

    • District PD plan meets state protocol standards


    Professional development4
    Professional Development Accountability

    • School schedule designed to include:

      • Common planning time

      • Job-embedded PD

    • School organized into Professional Learning Communities

  • District ensures resources for above

  • District provides PD on assessing student progress


  • Curriculum alignment pacing1
    Curriculum Alignment & Pacing Accountability

    • Identify and use evidence-based curriculum

    • Align curriculum to state standards

    • Implement pacing guides

    • Ensure secondary students properly placed in rigorous coursework (District monitors)

    • District supports and identifies best practices


    Continuous improvement model1
    Continuous Improvement Model Accountability

    • Administer diagnostics and provides remediation, acceleration & enrichment

    • Develop, implement curriculum calendar

    • District provides progress monitoring tools & analyzes data to determine effectiveness of instruction, allocate resources based on need

    • School implements Response to Intervention

    • Real-time access to student achievement data

    • District prescribes formative and summative assessments


    Continuous improvement model2
    Continuous Improvement Model Accountability

    • District monitors, analyzes PMRN 3x year

    • District monitors, analyzes progress monitoring on tested core-content areas 2x year

    • District ensures schools with greatest needs get greatest resources


    Choice ses
    Choice & SES Accountability

    • Offer both choice & SES


    Monitoring1
    Monitoring Accountability

    • SAC monitors implementation of school improvement plan

    • School assembles team to monitor fidelity of implementation

    • District monitors, evaluates improvement efforts

    • District evaluates PD


    Monitoring2
    Monitoring Accountability

    • District evaluates core-content progress monitoring 2x year and PMRN 3x year


    And… Accountability

    • District appoints an outside expert to advise the school on its progress toward making AYP based on its school improvement plan

    • District reorganizes district staff to support non-performance areas

    • District reassigns staff relevant to failure of the school


    Correct i
    Correct I Accountability

    • District directs intervention

    • State reviews progress


    School improvement planning2
    School Improvement Planning Accountability

    • SAC develops school improvement plan; district peer reviews and monitors

    • District develops District Improvement, Assistance, and Intervention Plan

    • District provides TA in analyzing student data, revising school budgets


    Leadership2
    Leadership Accountability

    • School reviews/replaces members of leadership team “as necessary”

    • District reviews/hires qualified principal

    • District provides “professional partner”

    • District uses state resources in leadership development


    Educator quality6
    Educator Quality Accountability

    Teachers highly qualified, certified

    • Paraprofessionals highly qualified

    • Student support services personnel highly qualified*

    • School does not have a higher percentage of first-year or out-of-field teachers than district average

    • Performance appraisals based primarily on achievement (including principal)

    • District trains on performance appraisal

    • School ensures performance appraisals of leadership include student achievement goals for subgroups


    Educator quality7
    Educator Quality Accountability

    • District ensures performance appraisal implemented with fidelity

    • School reviews/replaces all relevant staff as necessary

    • District prioritizes resources for staffing these schools

    • District implements differentiated pay

    • District uses state educator recruitment resources

    • District ensures school compliance with staffing requirements, provides TA, ensures mid-year vacancies filled


    Professional development5
    Professional Development Accountability

    • IPDPs target needs of subgroups missed

    • Mentoring/coaching by highly effective teacher

    • ILPDs include PD targeting subgroups missed

    • PD plan meets state protocol standards

    • Equitable access to technology & PD

    • District provides TA on each of the above

    • District PD plan meets state protocol standards


    Curriculum alignment pacing2
    Curriculum Alignment & Pacing Accountability

    • Identify and use evidence-based curriculum

    • Align curriculum to state standards

    • Implement pacing guides

    • Ensure secondary students properly placed in rigorous coursework (District monitors)

    • District supports and identifies best practices


    Continuous improvement model3
    Continuous Improvement Model Accountability

    • Administer diagnostics and provides remediation, acceleration & enrichment

    • Develop, implement curriculum calendar

    • District provides progress monitoring tools & analyzes data to determine effectiveness of instruction, allocate resources based on need

    • Real-time access to student achievement data

    • District provides TA on formative and summative assessments


    Continuous improvement model4
    Continuous Improvement Model Accountability

    • District monitors, analyzes PMRN 3x year

    • District monitors, analyzes progress monitoring on tested core-content areas 3x year

    • District ensures schools with greatest needs get greatest resources


    Choice ses1
    Choice & SES Accountability

    • Offer both Choice and SES


    Monitoring3
    Monitoring Accountability

    • SAC monitors implementation of school improvement plan

    • School assembles team to monitor fidelity of implementation

    • District monitors, evaluates improvement efforts

    • District evaluates PD


    And… Accountability

    • District appoints an outside expert to advise the school on its progress toward making AYP based on its school improvement plan and reassigns staff relevant to the failure of the school


    Prevent i
    Prevent I Accountability

    • School directs intervention

    • District provides assistance

    • State Monitors


    Prevent i means
    Prevent I Means… Accountability

    • School Improvement Planning

      • School & SAC develop school improvement plan; district peer review

      • District develops District Improvement, Assistance, and Intervention Plan

      • District provides TA in analyzing student data, revising school budgets

    • Leadership

      • School reviews/replaces members of leadership team “as necessary”

      • District uses state resources in leadership development


    Educator quality8
    Educator Quality Accountability

    - Teachers highly qualified, certified

    • Paraprofessionals highly qualified

    • Student support services personnel highly qualified*

    • Performance appraisals based primarily on achievement (including principal)

    • District trains on performance appraisal

      - District prioritizes resources for staffing, implements differentiated pay, uses state educator recruitment resources


    Professional development6
    Professional Development Accountability

    • IPDPs target needs of subgroups missed

    • Mentoring/coaching by highly effective teacher

    • ILPDs include PD targeting subgroups missed

    • PD plan meets state protocol standards

    • Equitable access to technology & PD

    • District provides TA on each of the above

    • District PD plan meets state protocol standards


    Curriculum alignment pacing3
    Curriculum Alignment & Pacing Accountability

    • Identify and use evidence-based curriculum

    • Align curriculum to state standards

    • Implement pacing guides

    • Ensure secondary students properly placed in rigorous coursework (District monitors)

    • District supports and identifies best practices


    Continuous improvement model5
    Continuous Improvement Model Accountability

    • Administer diagnostics and provides remediation, acceleration & enrichment

    • Develop, implement curriculum calendar

    • District provides progress monitoring tools & analyzes data to determine effectiveness of instruction, allocate resources based on need

    • Real-time access to student achievement data

    • District monitors, analyzes PMRN 3x year

    • District ensures schools with greatest needs get greatest resources


    Choice ses2
    Choice/SES Accountability

    • Offer SES


    Monitoring4
    Monitoring Accountability

    • SAC monitors implementation of school improvement plan

    • School assembles team to monitor fidelity of implementation

    • District evaluates PD


    And… Accountability

    • District appoints an outside expert to advise the school on its progress toward making AYP based on its school improvement plan and reassigns staff relevant to the failure of the school


    Continuous improvement model6
    Continuous Improvement Model Accountability

    • District monitors, analyzes progress monitoring on:

      • Progress monitoring 3x year for students requiring reading intervention

      • Tested core-content areas 3x year

    • District ensures schools with greatest needs get greatest resources


    Choice ses3
    Choice & SES Accountability

    • Offer both choice & SES


    Monitoring5
    Monitoring Accountability

    • SAC monitors implementation of school improvement plan

    • School assembles team to monitor fidelity of implementation

    • District monitors, evaluates improvement efforts

    • District evaluates PD


    And… Accountability

    • District appoints an outside expert to advise the school on its progress toward making AYP based on its school improvement plan


    Useful documents
    Useful Documents Accountability

    • USED: LEA and School Improvement Non-Regulatory Guidance REVISED July 21, 2006

    • FLDOE: Differentiated Accountability Plan


    ad