1 / 38

Regulatory Update

Regulatory Update. Jason Bostic April 10, 2007 West Virginia Mine Drainage Task Force. Introduction . Legislative Report Regulatory Issues Section 404 Issues Outlook . 2007 Legislative Session. Year of Stream Lists Defense on Safety Issues . 2007 Legislative Session.

Pat_Xavi
Download Presentation

Regulatory Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Regulatory Update Jason Bostic April 10, 2007 West Virginia Mine Drainage Task Force

  2. Introduction • Legislative Report • Regulatory Issues • Section 404 Issues • Outlook

  3. 2007 Legislative Session • Year of Stream Lists • Defense on Safety Issues

  4. 2007 Legislative Session • Tier 2.5 Streams -Anti-Deg Program • Trout Streams -Water Quality Standards Program

  5. 2007 Legislative Session • Legislative Rulemaking Review • Anti-deg Rule and WQS Rule become legislation

  6. 2007 Legislative Session • Legislative Battle -Farmers, Forestry, Oil & Gas, Manufacturers, Coal vs. WV DEP, Enviros -Tier 2.5 list amended in Senate Judiciary Committee to remove all but 38 streams from the list -Senate Judiciary Committee poised to delete proposed expansion of the trout stream list

  7. 2007 Legislative Session • Meanwhile in the House of Delegates… -House Judiciary Committee considers all of WV DEP’s rules at once -prematurely “bundled” the rules into one single piece of legislation -Entire rule package passed without amendment to House floor

  8. 2007 Legislative Session • Poised for a floor fight -Assembled enough votes on the floor to amend rules to delete most of the Tier 2.5 streams and to remove the expansion of the trout stream list -House leadership refused to add the bill to the special calendar so that it could proceed to amendment stage

  9. 2007 Legislative Session • Meanwhile in the Senate… -All work on WV DEP Rules halts in anticipation of receiving House version of legislation -Normally, Senate would accept House version and make amendments

  10. 2007 Legislative Session • House refuses to place WV DEP rules bill on special calendar • Senate has stopped working on the rules • DEADLOCK

  11. 2007 Legislative Session • House Judiciary Committee Chair tries to broker compromise • No fewer than six compromises offered by the “anti-deg coalition” • Each one would address trout streams and other rule issues as well as tier 2.5 streams • WV DEP and administration consistently rejected compromise offers • WV DEP wants 156 tier 2.5 streams • Anti-deg coalition cannot accept all 156 streams

  12. 2007 Legislative Session • What Happened? -Legislature adjourned without completing action on any of the WV DEP rules -Mining & Reclamation -Explosives & Blasting • What Happens Now? -Still hopeful for a compromise -All roads lead to the lawyers…

  13. 2007 Legislative Session • Why do we care if the rules failed to pass? -ALUMINUM • But… -EPA approved the change as though it was permanent

  14. 2007 Legislative Session No firewall between agencies on a rulemaking binge and the regulated community: Industry & the Public

  15. 2007 Legislative Session • Other Bills -Greenhouse Gas Reporting -Passed during the last hours of the session -Coal Association opposed the bill -Coal mining operations exempt

  16. 2007 Legislative Session • Coal Slurry Study Resolution -Reaction to hysteria campaign conducted by the extremists -Requires WV DEP to conduct a study of groundwater movement of injected slurry into domestic wells -Department of health to analyze chemical constituents of slurry • All of this has been done before, but not enough for the Other Side

  17. 2007 Legislative Session • Bills that failed to pass -UMWA on surface mine board -Prohibition on use of belt air -Prohibition on longwall mining -Requirement that WV DEP perform complete title search on all lands associated with mining permit -Various safety related bills

  18. Regulatory Issues Cascade of Legal Actions

  19. Regulatory Issues • Notices of Intent to Sue Selenium -Clean Water Act -SMCRA -Material Damage -Individual Permit Holders

  20. Regulatory Issues • Notice of Intent to Sue • Motion to Reopen Bonding Case -Alleges the Special Reclamation should hold NPDES permits at bond forfeiture sites -Coal mining effluent limits -Alleges the SRF is Insolvent -Legislature failed to act on recommendation to establish a trust fund -But SRF has enough $$$ to last until 2016

  21. Regulatory Issues • Final OSM Tennessee Bonding Rule -No Resolution of the AMD Policy • EPA Re-evaluation of Coal Mining Effluents Limits • Re-submission of Material Damage Definition

  22. Regulatory Issues • New Programmatic Section 404 General Permits -Nationwide Permit 21 Surface Coal Mining Operations -Nationwide Permit 49 Remining Operations -Nationwide Permit 50 Underground Mining Operations

  23. Section 404 Issues • Chambers Case -Challenge of Corps’ Issuance of IPs to Four Massey Energy Subsidiaries -Coal Association Intervenes to Protect Programmatic Issues • Extremists Have Found a New Whipping Boy: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

  24. Section 404 Issues • Alleged Pre-mining Stream Assessment Inadequate • Alleged Mitigation Unproven and Unable to Offset Stream Losses • Alleged Impacts Significant– EIS Required • Alleged Even if EIS was Conducted, Corps Could not Issue Permits

  25. Section 404 Issues • “Waste Treatment Exclusion” -Stream Length Between Toe of Fill and Sediment Pond -Extremists Argue that Segment is Being Illegally Used for Waste Assimilation -Corps, EPA Have Policy– Length is Part of a Waste Treatment System and Exempt from Section 402 Requirements

  26. Section 404 Issues • March 23, 2007 Decision • Judge Usurped the Corps’ Authority; Inserted His Own Beliefs for the Discretion of the Agency -Corps Failed to Adequately Measure Stream Functions -Mitigation Cannot Offset Losses -Corps NEPA Analysis Should Extend to Uplands Areas

  27. Section 404 Issues • Judge Rescinded the Four Permits • Decision Cuts Deep- -On-site Mitigation -Off-site Mitigation • Sets the Bar Too High; Ties the Corps’ Hands • Judge Bought the Plaintiffs’ Line w/ Respect to Stream Functions -Endorsed the Theories of Out-of-State Environmental Philosophers Over Professional Corps’ Staff

  28. Section 404 Issues • Plaintiffs Trying to Add Other Permits to the Case -They Have Always Viewed the Case as a Programmatic One • Subsequent Ruling, Judge Prohibited Further Placement of Material in Already-Started Fills -Cannot Raise the Elevation of the Deck of the Fill Even Though Corps’ Jurisdiction has Terminated

  29. Section 404 Issues • What Happens Now? -Major Slow Down in Corps Permitting (?) -Trying Our Best to Keep Decision From Becoming Programmatic (not much success) -Awaiting a Ruling on Waste Treatment Exclusion -Richmond, Here We Come!

  30. Something Wicked This Way Comes • FOIAs Filed by Same Groups -Louisville District IPs & NWPs -Pittsburgh District IPs & NWPs -Huntington District NWPs

  31. Section 404 Issues • Rapanos -Hopeful that Corps & EPA Finalize Jurisdictional Guidance Soon -Prospect of Each and Every Section 404 Permit Being Thrown Under the Wheels of the Legal System will Encourage Industry to Seek a Jurisdictional Challenge

  32. Outlook (Hint: Think Legal Bills) • Enough is Enough • WVCA Challenges • Selenium • Category A • AMD Policy • WV Stream Condition Index • Jurisdictional Waters

  33. Outlook • Refuse to Give Up and Resort Only to the Legal System -Work Through All of This

  34. Outlook • WV DEP Funding Issues -Division of Mining & Reclamation Needs $$$ (well, maybe they need $$$) -Review the OSM Required Staffing Levels -Work on Resolution that Satisfies Everyone

  35. Outlook • Selenium (the scientifically-indefensible standard) -Find a Treatment Solution -Site-Specific Criteria -Change the WQS • All of this Would be Easier if We Weren’t Fighting in Court

  36. Outlook • If Selenium is a Problem in West Virginia, Why is it Not a Problem Elsewhere? • Why is Selenium Only a Problem Related to Coal Mining? • Show Me the Impacts

  37. Outlook • Global Climate Change -Supreme Court has Fallen Victim to Hysteria -Back to EPA -Time for a Response

  38. Outlook • Don’t Give Up • Not Going to be Easy • Going to Cost Money • In the End, We Will Prevail -Appalachian Coal Far Too Important • But Will We Prevail Soon Enough?

More Related