Food from genetically engineered crops should we worry
Download
1 / 35

Presentation File - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 185 Views
  • Updated On :

Food from genetically engineered crops. Should we worry?. Maarten J. Chrispeels. Genetic change resulting from crop domestication took 10,000 years. Teosinte (top) and corn or maize (bottom). The March of Genetic Technology.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Presentation File' - PamelaLan


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Slide2 l.jpg

Genetic change resulting from crop domestication took 10,000 years.

Teosinte (top) and corn or maize (bottom)


The march of genetic technology l.jpg

The March of Genetic Technology years.

1860 Mendel:making crosses, introducing genes1920 Discovery of hybrid vigor1950 Inducing mutations1960 Tissue culture and embryo rescue1980 Plant transformation and GMOs2000 Genomics


Slide4 l.jpg

Crop improvement has allowed food production to keep up with

phenomenal population growth for the past 100 years.



Slide6 l.jpg

The scientific basis of all crop improvement is the identification of the genes that encode certain phenotypic characteristics.Those genes can now be transferred more easily (via marker assisted breeding - no GM) or directly (through genetic engineering - GM)


Molecular agriculture makes new gene combinations possible l.jpg
Molecular agriculture makes new gene combinations possible identification of the genes that encode certain phenotypic characteristics.

Peas (on the left) that make a genetically engineered bean protein are insect-resistant and do not need to be sprayed with pesticides.



What are people s concerns l.jpg
What are people’s concerns mechanism

  • Is this food safe?

  • Should food be labeled?

  • Are there adverse environmental effects?

  • Patenting of seeds

  • Discrimination against the poor

  • Who benefits?

All of these concerns apply to food and agriculture in general


Slide11 l.jpg

These concerns are generally true for all innovations. Governments create policies based on the following principles:

Promote the general welfare

Maintain people’s rights (individuals, groups, corporations)

Ensure justice: burdens and benefits must be fairly shared



Agriculture requires land clearing l.jpg

Fires burning in Northeast Brazil’s Maranhao region degradation

Agriculture requires land clearing


Slide14 l.jpg

Worldwide, 40 % of our food production depends on irrigation. Depletion of aquifers is occurring at twice the re-charge rate. Salinization is a major consequence of irrigation


Agriculture has narrowed the gene pool and caused a loss of biodiversity l.jpg
Agriculture has narrowed the gene pool and caused a loss of biodiversity

Wild Progenitors and Relatives

Land Races

Elite Lines


Slide16 l.jpg

Environmental Hazards from Pesticides biodiversity

  • Substantial health impacts on workers

  • Pollution of natural ecosystems/ waterways

  • Loss of insect biodiversity in agroecosystems

  • Creation of secondary pests

  • Creation of insect races resistant to pesticides


Slide17 l.jpg

Genetics is always better than chemicals: biodiversity

GM Cotton with a Bacillus thuringiensis Cry gene is resistant

to Cotton Bollworm. Cry encodes an insecticidal protein


Slide18 l.jpg

Reduced Pesticide Use with Insect-Protected Cotton biodiversity

Insect Control Ledger for 2000: Bollgard® Cotton on Five Million Acres

Bollgard®Cotton

Distribution

Application

Financial Benefit

Stewardship

ConsumerBenefit

Manufacturing

Net

  • Transports and stores 416,000 fewer gallons of insecticide

  • Conserves 604,000 gallons of fuel oil

  • Applies 1.04 million fewer pounds of insecticide in 2.5 fewer applications per acre

  • Disposes of 416,000 fewer insecticide containers

  • Saves 41,250 10-hour farm work days

  • Eliminates 2,150 10-hour days of aerial application

  • Conserves 2.41 million gallons of fuel and 93.7 million gallons of water

  • Accrues $168 million in economic benefits from lower production costs and increased cotton yield

  • Produces fiber equivalent to that found in all consumer products derived from cotton

  • Saves 3.46 million pounds of raw material

  • Conserves 1.48 million gallons of fuel oil

  • Eliminates 2.16 million pounds of industrial waste

  • Reduces pesticide exposure risk

  • Preserves beneficial insect populations

  • Creates wildlife benefits

  • Gives cotton producers more time for family and community activities

  • Gives cotton producers peace of mind

Dr. Roger Leonard, LSU Agricultural Center Dr. Ronald Smith, Auburn University

Bollgard® is a registered trademark of Monsanto Company© 2001 Monsanto Company


Slide19 l.jpg

Some GM crops have the potential to mitigate the environmental impact of agriculture: less pesticide, less dust, more biodegradable herbicides

“Roundup” tolerant soybeans can be

Planted with no-till procedures,

which eliminate plowing (dust),

Save water and use a biodegradable

herbicide


Hmm i wonder if there could be gene flow l.jpg
Hmm… I wonder if environmental impact of agriculture: less pesticide, less dust, more biodegradable herbicides there could be gene flow?

Gene flow occurs when crops cross with wild relatives growing

in relative close proximity to the fields.

Gene flow requires sexual compatibility

Gene persistence requires an evolutionary advantage for the new trait


Slide21 l.jpg

What about their nutritional value and safety? environmental impact of agriculture: less pesticide, less dust, more biodegradable herbicides


Slide22 l.jpg

What are the main food issues in the US? environmental impact of agriculture: less pesticide, less dust, more biodegradable herbicidesThe # 1 safety issue is bacteria (6000 deaths per yr.)The # 1 health issues are fat, sugar and salt


Are gm foods safe and nutritious l.jpg
Are GM foods safe and nutritious? environmental impact of agriculture: less pesticide, less dust, more biodegradable herbicides

  • All GM foods have been extensively tested and they are as safe as other foods in the market place.

  • GM crops can be made into convenience and “junk” food just like organic crops and other crops!

  • Nutrition depends on the food, not the method of crop breeding




Slide26 l.jpg

A GM soybean line, developed as a collaboration between the USDA and DuPont, is hypoallergenic in humans.

The approach is to down regulate the expression of the gene encoding the major allergenic protein (antisense)


Slide27 l.jpg

Hmmm.. Shouldn’t those things be labeled? USDA and DuPont, is hypoallergenic in humans


Labels are not neutral l.jpg
Labels are not neutral! USDA and DuPont, is hypoallergenic in humans

Produced by

Radiation

Breeding!


Slide29 l.jpg

Truthful labels can be misleading or meaningless USDA and DuPont, is hypoallergenic in humans

There are no GM apples anywhere!

Is food labeled this way

nutritious?


How to label l.jpg

How to Label? USDA and DuPont, is hypoallergenic in humans

Conventionally grown

GMO

Pesticides, twice a week Pesticide free


Should foods from gm crops be labeled perhaps l.jpg
Should foods from GM crops be labeled? Perhaps! USDA and DuPont, is hypoallergenic in humans

The US takes the view that if

foods are “substantially equivalent”,

the method of producing them

need not be on the label.

Farmers use a variety of techniques, and keeping production streams separate “from plow to plate” costs money. Such separation is called “identity preservation”. Who should pay for this?


Slide32 l.jpg

Voluntary labeling works in the US for Kosher and Organic foods.

Europe requires that all food that has any ingredient that is

more than 1% GM be labeled as “GM containing”.


So what s the bottom line l.jpg

So, what’s the bottom line? foods.

GM foods are as safe and there is promise for more nutritious food.

For some crops, environmental impacts are similar or less than conventional agriculture.

GM is an important tool for the plant breeder

GM technology can solve problems that can’t be solved in other ways at present.

The benefits will be spread between biotech companies, farmers and consumers.


Slide35 l.jpg

GM or no GM foods. is a false issue. Sustainability is the real issue.

Through science and through ethics we have come to the realization that we are bound by the laws of Nature. We must obey those laws to make agriculture (and civilization) sustainable.

Our agricultural practices must reflect our new awareness that many practices threaten sustainability. Food production must be equitable and just, and sustainable, for all the peoples of the Earth.


ad