Why social representations
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 13

Why social representations? PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 82 Views
  • Updated On :
  • Presentation posted in: General

Why social representations?. Anja Koski-Jännes Department of Sociology and Social Psychology University of Tampere IMAGES AND CONCEPTS OF ADDICTION 2nd Consortium Meeting Helsinki, 12-14 November 2007. Social representations. introduced by Serge Moscovici

Download Presentation

Why social representations?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Why social representations

Why social representations?

Anja Koski-Jännes

Department of Sociology and Social Psychology

University of Tampere

IMAGES AND CONCEPTS OF ADDICTION

2nd Consortium Meeting

Helsinki, 12-14 November 2007


Social representations

Social representations

  • introduced by Serge Moscovici

  • refer to lay theories of phenomena that are important to us

  • concerns systems of values, ideas and practices that

  • serve two kinds of functions:

    • by removing the mysterious edge from new phenomenona they bring order and manageability to our world

    • they facilitate communication

A K-J 12.11.2007


Who is serge moscovici

Who is Serge Moscovici?

  • born 1928 in a Jewish family in Romania

  • lived in France since 1948

  • a French social psychologist

  • Thesis La psychanalyse, son image, et son public (1961)

  • currently the director of the Laboratoire Européen de Psychologie Sociale ("European Laboratory of Social Psychology")

  • which he co-founded in 1975 at the Maison des Science de l’homme

A K-J 12.11.2007


How psychoanalysis was appropriated by the french society

How psychoanalysis was appropriated by the French society?

  • Initially a disturbing and confusing new phenomenon – a medical treatment without medication?

  • Focus of the thesis: how catholic, communist and urban liberals related to psychoanalysis

    • In a catholic context it was connected with confessing and father confessors, but its sexual aspects were rejected

    • commmunists saw it as a tool of the imperialist forces and therefore rejected it

    • urban liberals were the only group that approached it with curiosity and accepted its basic tenets because it fit with their previous knowledge base

  • A more general interest in how ideas of science are appropriated by common people and the nonspecialists

A K-J 12.11.2007


Collective and social representations

Collective and social representations

  • Emile Durkheim: collective representations

    • myths, traditions, legends, science, religion etc.

      • static

      • independent of unique individuals

      • were used to explain the life of a society

  • Moscovici: Social reepresentations

    • those concepts, images, and theories that we create of our changing world

    • folk beliefs or systems of belief about common objects

      • dynamic, interest in the evolving nature of representations

      • that require explanation as themselves

A K-J 12.11.2007


Social representations vs information processing or social constructionist approaches

Social representations vs. information processing or social constructionist approaches

  • SR are not only cognitive or linguistic phenomena

  • they highlight also the symbolic, emotive and social aspects of how people make sense of their world

  • interest in socially shared rather than individual ways of understanding

  • SR approach appreciates also the importance non-verbal material in the study of human psyche (Joffe 2002)

A K-J 12.11.2007


Main processes in forming social representations

Main processes in forming social representations

  • anchoring - naming and classifying a new object in one’s previous body of knowledge

    • e.g. psychoanalysis was anchored to confession in a catholic context

  • objectification – a process of filling a new phenomenon with familiar images by giving it an iconic form

    • personification as one form of objectification

      • e.g. theory of relativity is personified by Albert Einstein

  • naturalisation – hownew concepts turn to a part of the natural order and start to live a life of their own

A K-J 12.11.2007


Methods of study in sr studies

Methods of study in SR studies

  • highly variable

    • focus groups, surveys, interviews, drawings, free associations, media analysis, etc.

  • methodological triangulation

  • historical & developmental approaches

  • cultural and subcultural comparisons

A K-J 12.11.2007


Study of cultural variation in social representations

Study of cultural variation in social representations

  • different cultures and subcultural groups have different resources of ideas and imagery to draw upon when forming a social representation of something

  • therefore they also create somewhat different objectifications of the same concepts

  • they may also anchor them to different conceptual frameworks

A K-J 12.11.2007


Examples of related applications

Examples of related applications

  • representations of health (Flick et al. 2002)

    • how everyday or professional knowledge is informed by stocks of knowledge from science or a specific theory

    • identified cultures of knowledge among physicians and nursers

  • representations of AIDS (Crawford 1994)

  • represesentations of mental illness (Foster 2001)

    • central aspects of unified ’mental illness’: unpredictability, permanency, violence and Otherness

    • some differentiation to mental ilnesses

A K-J 12.11.2007


Preliminary trial with finnish interviewees sinr koski j nnes et al 2005

Preliminary trial with Finnish interviewees (SINR; Koski-Jännes et al. 2005)

  • the core of addiction was typically anchored in the physical effects of hard drugs and

  • objectified with such concepts as “hooks”, “heavenly effects”, which made them very difficult to change.

  • the psychological aspects of addiction were not seen to be linked to any neural basis at all

  • thus non-chemical addictions were regarded as enormously easy to change

  • representatives of different professional groups perceived the possibilities of recovery in widely differing ways

  • there were large crosscultural differences in views concerning possibilities of self-change

A K-J 12.11.2007


Images and or social representations

Images and/or social representations?

  • Images form a part of social representations

  • they are displayed in the objectified iconic aspects SR

  • particularly in professional contexts anchoring in the form of classification of addiction is of more importance

  • therefore we prefer to use SR in the survey and interview studies

A K-J 12.11.2007


References

References

  • Foster, J. (2001) Unification and differentation: A study of the social reporesentations of mental illness. In Papers on Social Representations 10,3, 1-18.

  • Joffe, H. (2002) Social representations and health psychology. In Social Science Infromation 41, 559-580.

  • Koski-Jännes, A., Vainionpää, J. & Haapamäki, L. (2005) Paving the way for change-related optimism in addictions. Dependence as a “social representation” and how to make more permeable for self-change processes. Paper presented at the First International Working Group Meeting of the Collaborative SINR Project, St. Peter’s Island, Erlach, Switzerland, September 18-21, 2005.

  • Moscovici, S. (1961/1976) La psychanalyse, son image, son public, University Presses of France.

  • Moscovici, S. (1981) On Social representations. In J. Forgas (Ed.) Social Cognition. European monographs in Social Psychology, 26. Academic press, London.

  • Pirttilä-Backman A-M ja Helkama K (2001) Serge Moscovici: Sosiaaliset representaatiot. Teoksessa V. Hänninen, O-H. Ylijoki ja J. Partanen (toim.) Sosiaalipsykologian suunnannäyttäjät. Vastapaino, Tampere, 253-274..

A K-J 12.11.2007


  • Login