1 / 21

Internet as a critical infrastructure: lessons from the backbone experience in South America

Internet as a critical infrastructure: lessons from the backbone experience in South America. F. Beltran, A. Bourdeau de Fontenay, & M. Wohlers Presentation: IDATE, Montpellier 22 November 2005 A. Bourdeau de Fontenay & J. Liebenau. Agenda.

Olivia
Download Presentation

Internet as a critical infrastructure: lessons from the backbone experience in South America

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Internet as a critical infrastructure: lessons from the backbone experience in South America F. Beltran, A. Bourdeau de Fontenay, & M. Wohlers Presentation: IDATE, Montpellier 22 November 2005 A. Bourdeau de Fontenay & J. Liebenau

  2. Agenda Given Internet’s strategic role in economic activities around the world, • Is Internet a critical infrastructure & what is it that is “critical” in Internet? • What can we learn from and for the South American experience?

  3. South America’s Internet Infrastructures • Analysis restricted to: • Argentine, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Peru, & Venezuela; • Below IP: backbones & interconnection/NAPs; • How can we understand different governance structures? • Is Internet perceived/treated as an infrastructure? • How to compare various governance? • Only a preliminary research step: • Internet not studied from that perspective; and • Limited empirical information.

  4. Problem • Is the backbone sector “competitive”? • Contestability (role of vertical integration); • Efficiency. • South America policy perspective • Historical & growth; • Universal access; vs. targeted access; • Suggest some “infrastructure perspective.” • Internet as an infrastructure • Markets & market structure; • Governance & exchange commons; • Internet geography.

  5. Telecommunicationsin Latin America • Significant overall progress • Fixed telephones almost doubled • 53 million to close to 93 million; • Mobile grew 8.5 times • 20 million to 172 million; • Internet users increased twelve-fold • 6 million to 72 million. • Growing digital divide • 14% penetration in Latin America vs. 50% access in developed countries; • Substantial population without access. • Policy concern • Universal vs. localized-targeted.

  6. Emergence of South America Internet • Access characteristics • Use of IBPs (international broadband providers); • All traffic routed via US. • Mid-90s: commercial access • New entrants; • Existing data networks; • Some incumbents.

  7. 1998: NAP Cabase Argentina • Cabase: Argentine Chamber for Databases and On-line Services; • ISPs • Initially: 3 ISPs • Now: 12, a mix of ISPs, data networks, & telco. • Not-for-profit • NAP outsourced to Comsat Argentina • Advocacy • NAP • 100% of national interconnection - all must be peering • Exclude international links (bilateral agreements)

  8. Cabase Argentina governance Open-Policy “equalitarian” NAP governance • Uniform membership requirements • Largely consensus; • Egalitarian • NAP contracts are uniform • Exclusively peering; • Members’ routing tables available to all

  9. Governance sustainability • 2003: Defection by 4 members • Commercially motivated (expected due to VOIP) • Traffic scale-based justification but • Disruptive to others (e.g., routing tables) • Request for compensation • Originally partial & eventually total. • Governance problem • No provision for defection foreclosure • No provision for dealing with conflicts among members • Appeal to government • Available but not pursued

  10. NAP Chile • Initiated by 6 ISPs • Led to Internet Provider Association • Regulation • Non-discriminatory, e.g., • Access to content • Access to backbones • Peering obligation (national traffic) • Quality requirements

  11. 1998: NAP Colombia • 12 ISPs create the Colombian Chamber of Informatics and Telecommunications (CCIT) • Egalitarian governance • Exclusively peering • Member-shared routing tables • 90% national traffic • Overall cost saving estimated at $1 Million • Operating costs migrated from equally shared to traffic-based

  12. Lessons from South America • Geographically-based NAPs; • Significance of NAP creation • Commercial/tier-based vs. equalitarian • Ability to evolve through time & potential for disruption • Significant cost considerations • Possible lessons • Critical infrastructure • Justifications for government intervention • Short run vs. long run • Peering vs. transit • Discrimination

  13. Background • Is Internet a critical infrastructure? • What constitutes Internet’s infrastructure? • Layer & function-based • Utilization routines • Interaction between infrastructure and market structure • Governance efficiency & sustainability

  14. What’s an infrastructure? • Intuitive and, yet, complex: • “The basic underlying framework or features of a system or organization.” • Conventional views: • Capital-intensive high sunk cost activities (e.g., streets); & • Society-wide activities (e.g., health). • Ignored by modern economic analysis • Today’s analysis based on goods & services & market-type environment • Limited integration of “exchange commons” dimensions: • Externalities • Governance

  15. Critical infrastructures • What is happening to infrastructures? Is infrastructure still a relevant concept? • Established • New? • How are infrastructures evolving through time? • Are infrastructures context-specific? Today’s FCC Internet regulatory policies • Yes: 9-11/terrorism • No: Deregulation of incumbents • Yes? Broadband as primary strategic goal

  16. Adam Smith & infrastructure economics • Government’s 3 duties • Defence • Justice • Infrastructures • The extent of the market & competition conditional upon the government’s duties • Minimization of government’s role conditional upon the government providing infrastructures

  17. Infrastructure economics:government & market roles • Infrastructures generally evolve from markets • A review of Coase’s lighthouse analysis: • Private sector • Can provide infrastructures; • Inadequate treatment of rivalry & excludability • Externalities • Regulation &/or licensing • “Exchange commons” governance is what matters

  18. Infrastructures and “round about” production • Young (1928): division of labor evolved to “round about”/layered production/transaction activities • Growing complexity of outputs • Increasing layering of processes • Innovation-based discontinuities • Implications for infrastructures • What layers are infrastructures? • Are “systems” (e.g., Internet as a system) infrastructures? Modern infrastructures support a very wide range of activities across the economy

  19. Infrastructures and “exchange commons” • Exchange commons • Conceptualization of transactions taking place in a generalized exchange regime within which markets of various kinds are subsets • Infrastructures are operated within exchange commons • Market inadequacy • Role of governance

  20. Internet’s geography • Internet transforms rather than eliminates the geographical dimension of economic activities • Good for some regions & bad for others • Human exchanges can only be partially “codified” • Codification leads to geographical independence • Hard-to-codify knowledge implies geographical limitations (e.g., exchange of personal views, complex transfer of information)

  21. Conclusions

More Related