Idsf new judging system
Download
1 / 17

IDSF New Judging System - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 938 Views
  • Uploaded on

IDSF New Judging System Proposal Stuttgart , 23rd August 2009 Concept Based on a ISU judging system that has IOC approval Possibility of phase by phase implementation Improved objectivity of marking Improved transparency Better understanding of judging by IOC, media and public

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'IDSF New Judging System ' - MikeCarlo


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Idsf new judging system l.jpg

IDSF New Judging System

Proposal

Stuttgart , 23rd August 2009


Concept l.jpg
Concept

  • Based on a ISU judging system that has IOC approval

  • Possibility of phase by phase implementation

  • Improved objectivity of marking

  • Improved transparency

  • Better understanding of judging by IOC, media and public

  • Provides constructive feedback to athletes and trainers


Changes needed l.jpg
Changes needed

  • Establishing the criteria - clear definitions

  • Establishing a numerical marking scale

  • Changing the format of the competition

  • Creating appropriate software and hardware

  • Changing the mindset of all participants involved


Idsf new judging system4 l.jpg
IDSF New judging System

  • Programme Components Score PCS

    • First draft ready for discussion and testing

  • General Deductions

    • First draft ready for discussion and testing

  • Technical Elements Score

    • Not ready due to lack of technical definitions


Programme components l.jpg
PROGRAMME COMPONENTS

  • 5 COMPONENTS – CRITERIA

    • PB Posture, Balance, Coordination

    • QM Quality of Movement

    • MM Movement to music

    • PA Partnering

    • CP Choreography and Presentation


Pb posture balance coordination l.jpg
PB – Posture, Balance, Coordination

  • Posture and Poise

  • Body line, shape, design

  • Hold or Holds

  • Positions and transitions

  • Balance

    • Static- Dinamic

    • Individual- Couple

  • Coordination of movement


Qm quality of movement l.jpg
QM – Quality of Movement

  • Actions

    • General

    • Style specific

  • Dynamics

    • Flow

    • Weight

    • Time

    • Space


Mm movement to music l.jpg
MM – Movement to Music

  • Time

  • Tempo

  • Rhytmical structure

  • Phrasing

  • Timing

  • Musicality


Pa partnering l.jpg
PA - Partnering

  • Physical connection

  • Communication without physical connection

  • Appropriateness

  • Effectiveness

  • Consistency


Cp choreography and presentation l.jpg
CP - Choreography and Presentation

  • Well balanced choreography

    • Content

    • Space

    • Partnering

    • Level of difficulty

  • Atmosphere

  • Creativity

  • Expression

  • Interpretation



Marking scale l.jpg
Marking scale

10 Outstanding

9 Superior

8 Very Good

7 Good

6 Above Average

5 Average

4 Fair

3 Weak

2 Poor

1 Very Poor


General deductions l.jpg
General Deductions

  • Balance loss

    • Momentary

    • Frequent

  • Fall

  • Delayed start

  • Early finish

  • Loss of connection

    • Momentary

    • Frequent or long

  • Dancing out of time

    • Momentary

    • Frequent or long

  • Discontinuation

    • Momentary

    • Frequent or long

  • Error

    • Momentary

    • Frequent


Pcs phase 1 l.jpg
PCS Phase 1

  • Programme components ( Criteria)

    • Presentation Stuttgart

      • Discussion

      • Corrections

    • Test event

      • Discussion

      • Corrections


Pcs phase 2 l.jpg
PCS Phase 2

  • Involving a wider panel of experts to create a final content of program components

  • Further presentations at IDSF adjudicators congresses

  • Further testing -to be decided by the Presidium of IDSF

  • Presentation to the IDSF 2010 AGM

    • Discussion

    • Changes( if required )

  • Motion for approval to the 2011 IDSF AGM


Pcs phase 3 l.jpg
PCS Phase 3

  • Education and training of IDSF Adjudicators

  • Implementation in IDSF events

    • World Championships

    • IOC events


Technical elements score l.jpg
Technical Elements Score

  • Parallel developement of the system for TES

  • Technical definitions of dance figures

    • Latin?

    • Compulsory figures?

  • Assigning base value to each figure – level of difficulty

  • Deciding on the scale of deductions


ad