idsf new judging system
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
IDSF New Judging System

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 17

IDSF New Judging System - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 942 Views
  • Uploaded on

IDSF New Judging System Proposal Stuttgart , 23rd August 2009 Concept Based on a ISU judging system that has IOC approval Possibility of phase by phase implementation Improved objectivity of marking Improved transparency Better understanding of judging by IOC, media and public

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'IDSF New Judging System ' - MikeCarlo


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
idsf new judging system

IDSF New Judging System

Proposal

Stuttgart , 23rd August 2009

concept
Concept
  • Based on a ISU judging system that has IOC approval
  • Possibility of phase by phase implementation
  • Improved objectivity of marking
  • Improved transparency
  • Better understanding of judging by IOC, media and public
  • Provides constructive feedback to athletes and trainers
changes needed
Changes needed
  • Establishing the criteria - clear definitions
  • Establishing a numerical marking scale
  • Changing the format of the competition
  • Creating appropriate software and hardware
  • Changing the mindset of all participants involved
idsf new judging system4
IDSF New judging System
  • Programme Components Score PCS
    • First draft ready for discussion and testing
  • General Deductions
    • First draft ready for discussion and testing
  • Technical Elements Score
    • Not ready due to lack of technical definitions
programme components
PROGRAMME COMPONENTS
  • 5 COMPONENTS – CRITERIA
    • PB Posture, Balance, Coordination
    • QM Quality of Movement
    • MM Movement to music
    • PA Partnering
    • CP Choreography and Presentation
pb posture balance coordination
PB – Posture, Balance, Coordination
  • Posture and Poise
  • Body line, shape, design
  • Hold or Holds
  • Positions and transitions
  • Balance
    • Static- Dinamic
    • Individual- Couple
  • Coordination of movement
qm quality of movement
QM – Quality of Movement
  • Actions
    • General
    • Style specific
  • Dynamics
    • Flow
    • Weight
    • Time
    • Space
mm movement to music
MM – Movement to Music
  • Time
  • Tempo
  • Rhytmical structure
  • Phrasing
  • Timing
  • Musicality
pa partnering
PA - Partnering
  • Physical connection
  • Communication without physical connection
  • Appropriateness
  • Effectiveness
  • Consistency
cp choreography and presentation
CP - Choreography and Presentation
  • Well balanced choreography
    • Content
    • Space
    • Partnering
    • Level of difficulty
  • Atmosphere
  • Creativity
  • Expression
  • Interpretation
marking scale
Marking scale

10 Outstanding

9 Superior

8 Very Good

7 Good

6 Above Average

5 Average

4 Fair

3 Weak

2 Poor

1 Very Poor

general deductions
General Deductions
  • Balance loss
    • Momentary
    • Frequent
  • Fall
  • Delayed start
  • Early finish
  • Loss of connection
    • Momentary
    • Frequent or long
  • Dancing out of time
    • Momentary
    • Frequent or long
  • Discontinuation
    • Momentary
    • Frequent or long
  • Error
    • Momentary
    • Frequent
pcs phase 1
PCS Phase 1
  • Programme components ( Criteria)
    • Presentation Stuttgart
      • Discussion
      • Corrections
    • Test event
      • Discussion
      • Corrections
pcs phase 2
PCS Phase 2
  • Involving a wider panel of experts to create a final content of program components
  • Further presentations at IDSF adjudicators congresses
  • Further testing -to be decided by the Presidium of IDSF
  • Presentation to the IDSF 2010 AGM
    • Discussion
    • Changes( if required )
  • Motion for approval to the 2011 IDSF AGM
pcs phase 3
PCS Phase 3
  • Education and training of IDSF Adjudicators
  • Implementation in IDSF events
    • World Championships
    • IOC events
technical elements score
Technical Elements Score
  • Parallel developement of the system for TES
  • Technical definitions of dance figures
    • Latin?
    • Compulsory figures?
  • Assigning base value to each figure – level of difficulty
  • Deciding on the scale of deductions
ad