What is morality and how does it work sage lecture 1 nov 10 2008
Download
1 / 51

What is morality - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 377 Views
  • Updated On :

What is morality and how does it work? Sage Lecture #1 Nov. 10, 2008. Jonathan Haidt University of Virginia. 6 Lectures on Morality. 11/10: What is morality and how does it work? 11/17: The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'What is morality ' - Michelle


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
What is morality and how does it work sage lecture 1 nov 10 2008 l.jpg

What is morality and how does it work?Sage Lecture #1Nov. 10, 2008

Jonathan Haidt

University of Virginia


6 lectures on morality l.jpg
6 Lectures on Morality

  • 11/10: What is morality and how does it work?

  • 11/17: The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion

  • 11/24: The positive moral emotions: Elevation, awe, admiration, and gratitude 

  • 12/1: Hive psychology, group selection, and leadership

  • 12/8: The dark side: Why moral psychology is the greatest source of evil  

  • 12/15: The light side: How to pursue happiness using ancient wisdom and modern psychology


Morality is the best topic l.jpg
Morality is the best topic

  • 1. One of oldest topics of inquiry

  • 2. One of the most useful topics

  • --for relationships

  • --for social problems

  • 3. One of the best linking topics

  • The ultimate goal of the center is both highly ambitious and refreshingly simple: when you understand the mind, you understand the human condition.


Magic trick 1 l.jpg
Magic trick #1

Where did the rabbit come from?

1. Put into the hat from outside, during the trick

2. Was in the hat all along

3. Was constructed in the hat, by the hat


Magic trick 2 l.jpg
Magic trick #2

Where did Max’s morality come from?

1. Put into Max from outside (empiricism)

2. Was in Max all along (nativism)

3. Was constructed in Max, by Max (constructivism)


1 empiricism l.jpg
1. Empiricism

“The human intellect at birth is rather like a tabula rasa, a pure potentiality that is actualized through education...”

Avicenna, 11th C.


2 nativism l.jpg
2. Nativism

Nature provides a first draft, which experience then revises… ‘Built-in' does not mean unmalleable; it means

organized in advance of experience.“

(Marcus, 2004)


3 constructivism l.jpg
3. Constructivism

  • “Even if adults never interfered, the social relations subsisting between children would perhaps be sufficient to create them. The play of sympathy and antipathy is a sufficient cause for practical reason to become conscious of reciprocity“ (Piaget, 1932)


Kohlberg s rationalist constructivism l.jpg
Kohlberg’s Rationalist Constructivism

Finish: Adult reaches understanding of morality as justice (stage 5)

During childhood: --experience helps cognitive skills unfold (a la Piaget) --Role-taking leads to understanding of fairness --Child constructs own morality

Start: no morality; egocentrism (Stages 1 and 2).


The rationalist model l.jpg
The Rationalist Model

“Affective forces are involved in moral decisions, but affect is neither moral norimmoral. When the affective arousal is channeled into moral directions, it is moral; when it is not so channeled, it is not. The moral channeling mechanisms themselves are cognitive.“(Kohlberg, 1971)

Eliciting

Situation

Reasoning

Affect

Judgment


The rationalist model11 l.jpg
The Rationalist Model

Key points:

1) The action in moral psych is in the study of reasoning/justification

2) Little or no moral content is innate

3) Morality is about justice and rights, discovered by thinking about harm and welfare.


Why i don t believe it l.jpg
Why I don’t believe it

David Hume: “Reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions, and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them.”

(A Treatise of Human Nature, 1739)

Passion/

sentiment

Judgment

Reasoning


Slide13 l.jpg

“There has been a controversy started of late ... concerning the general foundation of Morals; whether they be derived from Reason, or from Sentiment; whether we attain the knowledge of them by a chain of argument and induction, or by an immediate feeling and finer internal sense;

whether, like all sound judgments of truth and falsehood, they should be the same to every rational intelligent being; or whether, like the perception of beauty and deformity, they be founded entirely on the particular fabric and constitution of the human species.”

(Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, 1960/1777


Evidence for humean model interview studies l.jpg
Evidence for Humean Model: Interview Studies

  • Harmless taboo violations (Haidt, Koller, & Dias, 1993, JPSP).

  • Sexual morality (Haidt & Hersh, 2001, JASP)

  • Moral dumbfounding (Haidt, Bjorklund, & Murphy, in prep)

1) Moral reasoning: Heinz dilemma

2) Harmless taboo: Consensual adult sibling incest

3) Harmless taboo: Cannibalism of unclaimed corpse

4) Disgust dumbfounding: Sterile cockroach in juice

5) Superstitious dumbfounding: Selling your soul

Key question: Do P’s behave like scientists searching for truth, or like lawyers searching for justifications?


Slide15 l.jpg

I, _____________________,

hereby sell my soul, after my death,

to ___SCOTT MURPHY______,

for the sum of _____.

___________________

(signed)

Note: This form is part of a psychology experiment.

It is NOT a legal or binding contract, in any way.


Slide16 l.jpg

“I agree [with that counterargument] and I respect that opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”


Results l.jpg
Results opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”

  • On Heinz, it looks like people are reasoning: --give reasons before giving judgment--keep most of their arguments--say they are relying on reason more than gut feeling

On harmless taboo stories, more dumbfounding: --give judgment first, then reasons --drop most of these reasons under cross-examination

--say they relied on “gut feeling” more than reasoning

--make more unsupported declarations (“it’s just wrong!”)


The social intuitionist model haidt 2001 psych review l.jpg
The Social Intuitionist Model opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”(Haidt, 2001, Psych Review)

6

A’s Intuition

A’s Judgment

2

A’s Reasoning

1

5

4

3

B’s Reasoning

B’s Judgment

B’s Intuition

Four main processes:

1) the intuitive judgment link

2) the post-hoc reasoning link

3) the reasoned persuasion link

4) the social persuasion link

Two rare processes:

5) the reasoned judgment link

6) the private reflection link


Evidence for sim inducing extraneous disgust wheatley haidt 2005 psych science l.jpg
Evidence for SIM: Inducing Extraneous Disgust opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”(Wheatley & Haidt, 2005, Psych Science)

Congressman Arnold Paxton frequently gives speeches condemning corruption and arguing for campaign finance reform. But he is just trying to cover up the fact that he himself [will take bribes from] [is often bribed by] the tobacco lobby to promote their legislation.

Bob was at a family gathering when he met Ellen, a second cousin of his that he had never met before. Bob found Ellen very attractive and he asked her out on a date. Ellen accepted and they began to have a romantic and sexual relationship. They [take] [often go on] weekend trips to romantic hotels in the mountains.

Rate “how morally wrong is this?” and “How disgusting is this?”


Hypnotic disgust makes judgments more severe l.jpg
Hypnotic disgust makes judgments more severe opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”

*

**

n=64/45


Hypnotic disgust makes judgments more severe21 l.jpg
Hypnotic disgust makes judgments more severe opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”

*

*

**

**

n=64/45

n=94/63


What if no condemnation is possible l.jpg
What if no condemnation is possible? opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”

  • Dan is a student council representative at his school. He is in charge of scheduling discussions about academic issues. He [tries to take] <often picks> topicsthat appeal to both professors and students in order to stimulate discussion.

“I don’t know, it just seems like he’s up to something.”[Dan is a] “popularity seeking snob”“I’m not sure, it just is.


Intuition tilts the table l.jpg
Intuition tilts the table opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”


Slide24 l.jpg

Dramatization

Study 2

Study 1

Study 4


The social intuitionist model l.jpg
The Social Intuitionist Model opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”

6

A’s Intuition

A’s Judgment

2

A’s Reasoning

1

“I knew about ‘the word’ but it still disgusted me anyway and affected my ratings. I would wonder why and then make up a reason to be disgusted.”

5

4

3

B’s Reasoning

B’s Judgment

B’s Intuition


The new synthesis in moral psych haidt 2007 science l.jpg
The New Synthesis in Moral Psych opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”(Haidt, 2007, Science)

  • 1) Intuitive primacy (but not dictatorship)

  • 2) Moral thinking is for social doing

  • 3) Morality binds and builds

  • 4) Morality is about more than harm and fairness


The new synthesis in moral psych l.jpg
The New Synthesis in Moral Psych opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”

1) Intuitive primacy (but not dictatorship)

2) Moral thinking is for social doing

3) Morality binds and builds

4) Morality is about more than harm and fairness


The intuitive brain l.jpg
The intuitive brain.... opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”

  • --Emotion areas are crucial for moral judgment (Damasio; Greene)

  • --Neuroecon is largely the study of how emotional reactions predict departures from econ rationality (Sanfey et al., Rilling et al.)

  • --Psychopaths have an emotional deficit, not reasoning or knowledge deficit (Hare; Cleckley; Blair; Kiehl)

  • --Chimps and 2 y.o. children show the emotional building blocks of morality (de Waal; Wynn & Bloom)


The new synthesis in moral psych30 l.jpg
The New Synthesis in Moral Psych opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”

1) Intuitive primacy (but not dictatorship)

2) Moral thinking is for social doing

3) Morality binds and builds

4) Morality is about more than harm and fairness


Functionalisms moral thinking is done in order to l.jpg
Functionalisms opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”Moral thinking is done in order to...

  • 1. Feel good. (Intrapsychic functionalism: Freud, Cialdini)

  • 2. Find the truth. (Epistemic functionalism: Plato, Kohlberg, rationalists)

  • 3. Succeed socially. (Social-functionalism: Darwin, Tooby, Cosmides, Dunbar)

  • --the “interpreter module” (Gazzaniga, 1985)

  • --the intuitive politician (Tetlock) and the ubiquity of hypocrisy (Batson)


The new synthesis in moral psych32 l.jpg
The New Synthesis in Moral Psych opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”

1) Intuitive primacy (but not dictatorship)

2) Moral thinking is for social doing

3) Morality binds and builds

4) Morality is about more than harm and fairness


3 morality binds and builds l.jpg
3) Morality binds and builds opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”


3 morality binds and builds34 l.jpg
3) Morality binds and builds opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”


Darwin morality was the binder l.jpg
Darwin: Morality was the Binder opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”

  • A tribe including many members who, from possessing in a high degree the spirit of patriotism, fidelity, obedience, courage, and sympathy, were always ready to aid one another, and to sacrifice themselves for the common good, would be victorious over most other tribes; and this would be natural selection. At all times throughout the world tribes have supplanted other tribes; and … morality is one important element in their success

  • --Descent of Man, Ch. V


The new synthesis in moral psych36 l.jpg
The New Synthesis in Moral Psych opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”

1) Intuitive primacy (but not dictatorship)

2) Moral thinking is for social doing

3) Morality binds and builds

4) Morality is about more than harm and fairness


Morality is l.jpg
Morality is..... opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”

“prescriptive judgments of justice, rights, and welfare pertaining to how people ought to relate to each other.” (Turiel, 1983)


Morality is38 l.jpg
Morality is..... opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”

“prescriptive judgments of justice, rights, and welfare pertaining to how people ought to relate to each other.” (Turiel, 1983)

Harm/Care


Morality is39 l.jpg
Morality is..... opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”

“prescriptive judgments of justice, rights, and welfare pertaining to how people ought to relate to each other.” (Turiel, 1983)

Fairness/

Justice

Harm/Care


Morality as harm reduction l.jpg
Morality as harm reduction: opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”

“Morality is an informal public system applying to all rational persons, governing behavior that affects others, and has the lessening of evil or harm as its goal.” (Gert, Stanford Encycl. of Phil.)

“If, as I believe, morality is a system of thinking about (and maximizing) the well being of conscious creatures like ourselves, many people's moral concerns are frankly immoral.” (Harris, 2008)


1 harm care l.jpg
1. Harm/care opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”


2 fairness reciprocity l.jpg
2. Fairness/reciprocity opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”


3 ingroup loyalty l.jpg
3. Ingroup/loyalty opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”


4 authority respect l.jpg
4. Authority/respect opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”


5 purity sanctity l.jpg
5. Purity/sanctity opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”


Slide46 l.jpg

Liberals 2 channels, Conservatives 5 opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”

Harm

Fairness

Endorsement

Authority

Ingroup

Purity


So what is morality l.jpg
So.... What is morality? opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”

“Moral systems are interlocking sets of values, virtues, norms, practices, identities, institutions, technologies, and evolved psychological mechanisms that work together to suppress or regulate selfishness and make social life possible”

(Haidt, 2008, Perspectives on Psych Science)


And how does it work l.jpg
And how does it work? opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”

Key points:

1) The action in moral psych is in the study of reasoning/justification

2) Little or no moral content is innate

3) Morality is about justice and rights, discovered by thinking about harm and welfare.


Slide49 l.jpg

“There has been a controversy started of late ... opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”concerning the general foundation of Morals; whether they be derived from Reason, or from Sentiment; whether we attain the knowledge of them by a chain of argument and induction, or by an immediate feeling and finer internal sense; whether, like all sound judgments of truth and falsehood, they should be the same to every rational intelligent being; or whether, like the perception of beauty and deformity, they be founded entirely on the particular fabric and constitution of the human species.”

(Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, 1960/1777


Thank you l.jpg
Thank You opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”

Mentors: Paul Rozin, Alan Fiske, Richard Shweder, Dan Wegner

Collaborators: Thalia Wheatley, Fredrik Bjorklund, Simone Schnall, Pete Ditto, Jesse Graham, Ravi Iyer, SenaKoleva

Papers available at www.JonathanHaidt.com


Definitions of terms l.jpg
Definitions of terms: opinion, but I’m afraid I’m not swaying on this topic. I just feel too strongly against it.”

  • Moral Judgment: Evaluations (good vs. bad) of the actions or character of a person that are made with respect to a set of virtues held by a culture or subculture to be obligatory.

  • Moral Reasoning: Conscious mental activity that consists of transforming given information about people in order to reach a moral judgment.

  • Moral Intuition: The sudden appearance in consciousness, or at the fringe of consciousness, of an evaluative feeling (like-dislike, good-bad) about the character or actions of a person, without any conscious awareness of having gone through steps of search, weighing evidence, or inferring a conclusion.


ad