New and emerging science and technology
Download
1 / 75

New and Emerging - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 331 Views
  • Updated On :

New and Emerging Science and Technology. NEST. Alejandro MARTIN HOBDEY Unidad NEST DG RTD B-1 Madrid, 23 Noviembre 2005. Revisions of the NEST WP and last NEST Call for Proposals Practical information on this NEST PATHFINDER Call

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'New and Emerging ' - Mia_John


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
New and emerging science and technology l.jpg

New and Emerging Science and Technology

NEST

Alejandro MARTIN HOBDEY

Unidad NEST

DG RTD B-1

Madrid, 23 Noviembre 2005


Slide2 l.jpg

Revisions of the NEST WP and last NEST Call for Proposals

Practical information on this NEST PATHFINDER Call

Some brief info on the outcome of the last Call for Proposals on NEST PATHFINDER Topics 2004/2005

Pathfinder Topics 2005/2006

Cultural Dynamics

Measuring the Impossible

What it means to be human (CAs and SSAs only)

Synthetic Biology

Tackling Complexity in Science

Outline of presentation


Revision of the nest wp 2005 06 l.jpg

NEST PATHFINDER Call: published on 27 October 2005, closing on 15 February 2006

This is the last Call for NEST; no further call for NEST ADVENTURE, INSIGHT, or SUPPORT

Call budget: €50M

Pre-proposal check open up to three weeks before deadline

Revision of theNEST WP 2005-06


Slide4 l.jpg

“support research on specific topics on 15 February 2006 that are identified during the course of implementation of FP6 on the basis of their urgency and potential for future societal, industrial or economic relevance.”

PATHFINDER:

Mandate


Slide5 l.jpg

Ideas must come “bottom-up” on 15 February 2006 from the science base

Open forum for ideas may be useful (ADVENTURE + INSIGHT proposals, NEST “ideas in-box”)

A “Structured dialogue” with the research community is required to make choices:

Search strategy within the science and technology “space”

Interaction with the research community structured over time to move from global assessment to specific choices

PATHFINDER topics

Identification/Selection


Slide6 l.jpg

Definition of search strategy on 15 February 2006 :

Areas of research where cross-disciplinary transfers of technique are creating new opportunities

Outside the frame of thematic priorities

Identification of candidate areas, on basis of research literature, foresight and other strategic analysis, plus open invitations for ideas

Iterative process of testing and refining choices:

Targeted workshops with external experts to explore candidate areas

Internal consultation with thematic priorities

High level consultation with EURAB, programme committee

PATHFINDER topics

“Structured dialogue”


Slide7 l.jpg

Build and consolidate European capabilities on 15 February 2006 in promising emerging (interdisciplinary) areas with high future potential for Europe in the long term.

Provide “early stage funding”: as ideas mature they should be translated into more conventional funding modes

Up to 10 Mio. EUR or more per topic (for several STREPS + one or more CAs)

Annual calls for proposals; several topics per call

PATHFINDER:

Implementation


Slide8 l.jpg

Initial “blue sky” topic analysis (8 March 2005) on 15 February 2006

How Things Evolve: Evolution Outside of Biology

Laboratory of the Future; Speeding up the Discovery Process

Transmission of Culture

New Techniques for Molecular Imaging

Time in Biological Processes and Systems

More detailed “opportunity analysis” (3 May 2005)

Transmission of Culture

Work programme text preparation meeting (8 July 2005)

Cultural Dynamic: from transmission: and change to innovation

More details, summaries of meetings, list of participants, on NEST web site.

Main Workshops

this year


Slide9 l.jpg

Each PATHFINDER initiative/topic will be composed of on 15 February 2006 several STREP projects submitted individually (not as clusters)

Proposals have to be submitted as FULL proposals (one stage evaluation process not two stages as in NEST-OPEN)

Proposers need to choose clearly one PATHFINDER initiative/topic they are addressing

Proposals will be evaluated and selected on their individual merits

Projects funded within a PATHFINDER initiative will be expected to develop a degree of interaction, exchange and cooperation

Project size expected to be in the 1.5-2.0 Mio. EUR range; 4 - 6 partners

STREP projects


Slide10 l.jpg

Expect to fund on 15 February 2006 one (exceptionally more) co-ordination action for each PATHFINDER initiative/topic

Co-ordination actions will be evaluated and selected at the same time as the STREP proposals

Role of co-ordination depends on topic

An added task will be to provide a means and venue of interaction for the chosen projects

Funding expected to be in the 1 to 1.5 MEuro range; 15 – 25 partners

Coordination

Actions


Slide11 l.jpg

Possibility of Support Actions open for each topic on 15 February 2006

Support actions will be evaluated and selected at the same time as the STREP proposals

Role of support depends on topic; do nit expect to fund “general” support actions on “general” topics

An added task will be to provide a means and venue of interaction for the chosen projects

Funding expected to be ~200.000 range

Support Actions


Pathfinder topics last call l.jpg

Tackling Complexity in Science on 15 February 2006

Synthetic Biology

Measuring the Impossible

Cultural Dynamics (New topic)

What it means to be human (only CAs and SSAs)

PATHFINDER: Topics Last Call


Slide13 l.jpg

PATHFINDER on 15 February 2006

Practical Aspects and

Frequently Asked Questions


Pathfinder reference documents l.jpg

Reference documents available on on 15 February 2006 NEST Web Site for each topic

Generated following iterative consultations with experts

Provide further practical guidance to proposers in terms of the scope, objectives, partnerships, etc

Proposers are strongly encouraged to consult and read over the documents prior to preparing proposals

Pathfinder Reference documents


Pre proposal check service l.jpg

Pre-proposal check service available on 15 February 2006 up to 3 weeks prior to the deadline (that is: 11 January 2006)

Pre-proposal Forms: Guide for Proposers

Requested: project summary + partnership

Before submitting, ideas and partnership should be pretty clear and stable

NEST will give guidance regarding suitability of scope and eligibility, based on information submitted

Responses from the EC are simply for guidance and do not commit the Commission either way

Final decision on proposals made by external expert evaluators

Not a discussion forum!

Pre-proposals (PATHFINDER) and OUTLINE Proposals (ADVENTURE, INSIGHT) are something different

Pre-proposal check service


Evaluation l.jpg

Evaluation will be performed first by sending proposals to remote referees for detailed technical evaluation

Following that, a Panel with wide ranging expertise will be brought together to choose the most outstanding proposals, and that form a complementary set

Evaluation expected to take place in April 2006, and initial results available before the end of July

Expert referees on these topics always needed / welcome (include NEST activity code) (http://www.cordis.lu/experts/fp6_candidature.htm)

Evaluation


Nest pathfinder information and brokerage event brussels nov dec 2005 l.jpg

Still Tentative… remote referees for detailed technical evaluation

Overall Information on Pathfinder

Parallel sessions on each topic

Chance to meet potential partners

Jointly organised with NCPs

NEST-PATHFINDER Information and Brokerage Event, Brussels, Nov/Dec 2005


Previous call fp6 2004 nest path l.jpg

Call budget 35M€ remote referees for detailed technical evaluation

59 STREP proposals, 17 retained

4 CA proposals, 0 retained

5 SSA proposals, 1 retained

Previous Call:FP6-2004-NEST-PATH


Slide19 l.jpg

Synthetic Biology remote referees for detailed technical evaluation

3 new STREPs funded out of 14 submitted(21% success rate)

1 SSA funded, no CAs

What it means to be human

8 new STREPs funded out of 21 submitted(38% success rate)

No CAs or SSAs

Measuring the Impossible

6 STREPs funded out of 24 submitted(25% success rate)

No CAs or SSAs

Previous Call:FP6-2004-NEST-PATH


Pathfinder initiative on tackling complexity in science alejandro martin hobdey 2005 l.jpg

www.cordis.lu/nest remote referees for detailed technical evaluation

PATHFINDER initiative on:Tackling complexity in scienceAlejandro MARTIN HOBDEY2005


Background motivation l.jpg

Complexity is a critical challenge towards progress in many areas of Science (e.g. biology, cognitive science)

Increasing need to understand behaviour of ever more complicated man made systems (e.g. electrical grid) – Technological Systems

Same is true of natural phenomena such as weather, geology, etc – Natural Systems

Also true of understanding human networks (social, political, enterprise, etc) – Social Systems

Common approach and techniques emerging to dealing with complex problems in science and technology

Background / motivation


Objectives of initiative l.jpg

Bring together high level groups in areas of Complex Systems Science and others in specific disciplines to tackle important problems where complexity is a key issue

Extend and generalise techniques used in one area to other areas of science (“generalisability”)

Help structure and co-ordinate the complexity field in Europe

Objectives of initiative


Emphasis and approach l.jpg

Use of tools and techniques of complex systems science areas of such as:

Representing complex systems as networks, and networks of networks, etc

“Emergence”: key characteristic of complex systems

Predictability and extreme events

Transfer or extension of successful techniques from one area of science to another

Projects should take a practical problem solving approach, grounded in (experimental, real) data

Emphasis and approach


Some possible topics l.jpg

Biology, Health, Medicine areas of

Bio-complexity, Cellular signalling and regulation processes, animal biology (BIOPHOT, STARFLAG, EMBIO, BRACCIA, etc)

Social Sciences

Emergence and robustness of social institutions, financial markets, etc (COMPLEXMARKETS, COL-PLEXITY, CAVES

Environmental Sciences

Predictability and distribution of extreme events in natures, such as earthquakes, floods, weather, ecology (E2C2)

Particularly interested in projects that help bridge gap between physical sciences, and social and other natural sciences

Some possible topics


Possible co ordination actions l.jpg

Already have a “General Coordination Action” linking together the already funded PATHFINDER projects in the initiative: “GIACS”

Expect that new funded projects will have some link to GIACS in some formal or informal way

Expect newly proposed CAs to focus on particular scientific areas or approaches to complexity

Possible Co-ordination Actions


Possible support actions l.jpg

Focussed Actions of more limited scope together the already funded PATHFINDER projects in the initiative:

One to two years of duration

Budget range: up to 250.000 €

Sort of activities envisaged: science mapping, foresight, conference or large work-shop, etc

It would make sense if there were a link between the SSA and the already supported activities in the NEXT- Complexity initiative

Possible Support Actions


Examples of topics not included l.jpg

Research of a purely together the already funded PATHFINDER projects in the initiative: theoretical nature

ICT – IT related research (FET initiative)

Purely industrial or engineering nature

Financial research not related to social sciences (eg. Stock market analysis)

Research of limited interdisciplinary nature

Proposals whose primary focus lies in one of the other Pathfinder Initiatives

Research in Thematic Priorities

Examples of topics not included


Pathfinder initiative on synthetic biology christian krassnig 2005 l.jpg

www.cordis.lu/nest together the already funded PATHFINDER projects in the initiative:

PATHFINDER initiative on

Synthetic Biology

Christian KRASSNIG

2005


Background l.jpg

1st Call 2003, 2nd Call 2004 together the already funded PATHFINDER projects in the initiative:

30 proposals received (7 STREPs, 1SSA funded)

Refinement of reference document for 3rd Call

Expert Group delivered report (to develop a broader strategy for the area)

Background


Slide30 l.jpg

Limited number of STREP proposals together the already funded PATHFINDER projects in the initiative:

A lot of proposals not regarded as within the scope of the Call

Lack of ambition in terms of the « technology vision »

No particular interest in safety issues linked to the topic

No Coordination Action(s)

Issues not covered (1st and 2nd Call)


Slide31 l.jpg

To understand how cells work you need more than a « list » of parts

Systems biology provides knowledge how parts of the cell operate together

New tools available such as computer models and bio-informatics, rapid synthesis, better experimental techniques to explore gene interactions

Why is this topic emerging?


Slide32 l.jpg

It will drive industry, research, employment, education in a way that might rival the computer industry’s development during the 1970s to the 1990s

Progress will be made much faster and in a much more organized way

It will enable developments of complex systems not achievable by evolutionary and screening procedures

If the « engineering of biology » becomes available it will be used for more and more day-to-day applications

Main vision – Biotechnology that works


Slide33 l.jpg

Major change through Synthetic Biology will be achieved by integration of existing disciplines.

Biology and engineering, computer modeling, information technology, control theory, chemistry and nanotechnology

Synthetic Biology is primarily not concerned with investigating how nature works, but is ultimately about a new way of making things.

Main directions


Objective s l.jpg

Objective/s integration of existing disciplines.

The DESIGN and ENGINEERING of biologically based (or inspired) PARTS or SYSTEMS with:

New standardised functionalities NOT present in NATURE

High level of internal complexity

Logical or complex dynamical behaviour


Specific target research projects streps 1 l.jpg

Demonstration of mastering control over key biological processes.

Development and application of robust modules amenable to standardisation.

Combination of rigorous engineering methods and high-quality science, involving adequate expertise in core engineering disciplines.

Specific Target Research Projects (STREPs) (1)


Specific target research projects streps 2 l.jpg

Specific Target Research Projects (STREPs) (2) processes.

  • Demonstration of real capacity to drive new discoveries and theories

  • and/or

  • Proof of concrete applicability to model areas.


Co ordination action ca l.jpg

Co-ordination of existing and future research projects. processes.

Networking of European activities in relevant fields

Intellectual and material infrastructure requirements of synthetic biology

Perspectives and strategies for innovation and industrial translation, including intellectual property

Societal acceptance, including ethical, safety and regulatory aspects

Co-ordination Action (CA)


Specific support actions ssas l.jpg

Tackling practical questions related to the field. processes.

To assist in the mapping and development of the definition of the field in question.

Assessing future development prospects and trends in the field.

Specific Support Actions (SSAs)


What research will not be pursued l.jpg

What research will NOT be pursued ? processes.

  • Research whose main focus is computational, combinatorial or biomimetic chemistry.

  • Research on functional genomics and proteomics.

  • Single-component genetic engineering and classical biotechnology, including classical metabolic engineering.

  • Research on structural biology and systems biology mainly aimed at the generation of basic knowledge.

  • Protein engineering or chemistry in its classical sense.

  • Research on tissue engineering.

  • Research on artificial organs and bionics implants, and other research on classical biomedical engineering.

  • Research related to Artificial Life (as the term is used by the ICT community e.g. life-like machines or computers).


Pathfinder initiative on measuring the impossible carlos saraiva martins 2005 l.jpg

PATHFINDER initiative on processes.

Measuring the Impossible

Carlos SARAIVA MARTINS

2005


Objectives l.jpg

Objectives processes.

Interdisciplinary research

Novel investigative methods

Significant advance in the scientific basis for rigorous measurements of phenomena

Intrinsically multidisciplinary and mediated by

human interpretation and/or perception


Slide42 l.jpg

processes.support research on specific topics that are identified during the course of implementation of FP6 on the basis of their urgency and potential for future societal, industrial or economic relevance.”

PATHFINDER:

Mandate


Why this initiative l.jpg

Why this initiative ? processes.

…becomes a general concern for science, business and public authorities …

Science- strong cross-over between physical, biological and social sciences

Business- products and services appeal to consumers according to parameters of quality, beauty, comfort which are mediated by human perception

Public authorities- provide citizens with support and services whose performance is measured according to parameters of life quality, security or well being


Measuring the impossible l.jpg

Measuring the impossible processes.

“Measure what is measurable, and make measurable what isn’t”

Descartes (1596-1650)


Measuring the impossible45 l.jpg

Measuring the impossible processes.

“ If you can not measure it

and/or what it means”

then

=> how can you improve it ? ”


Measuring the impossible46 l.jpg

Measuring the impossible processes.

It is simply impossible to find out what a test measures, without knowing how it works

Tables of correlations are unable to fill this gap, because what is lacking is not data, but theory

A radical shift in orientation is needed in our thinking about measurements and validity


Measuring the impossible47 l.jpg

Measuring the impossible processes.

Food industry – chemical and physical analysis combined with empirical psychometric studies moved to

…a more systemic understanding of the ways in which the physical world is mediated via the senses and the internal processing of signs in the human brain


Measuring the impossible48 l.jpg

Measuring the impossible processes.

But, is it possible to measure the role of memory in the appreciation of food?

….Or the food-addictive behaviour?

Predicting food selection

How to make “healthy choice the easy choice” ?


Specific target research projects streps l.jpg

Fundamental scientific advances supported by interdisciplinary research and novel investigative methods for the measurement of intrinsically multidimensional phenomena, and which are mediated by human interpretation and/or perception.

Specific Target Research Projects (STREPs)


Slide50 l.jpg

Focus on measurement interdisciplinary research and novel investigative methods

Multidimensional phenomena

Mediated by human interpretation and/or perception

Interdisciplinary research

Novel investigative methods

Concrete and tangible objectives

Well posed problems and measurement challenges

Long-term impact in terms of advancing science

Measuring the impossible

STREP Characteristics


Co ordination action l.jpg

to act as a forum for the development and exchange of ideas of active players

to promote a wider understanding of the implications of research across the various relevant disciplines, as regards measurement

to bring together experts in metrology, material scientists, biologists, psychologists, cognitive neuroscientists, sociologists, ergonomic experts to take up work in this “field”

to provide a degree of coordination and interaction between the research projects ultimately selected in this initiative

Measuring the impossible

Co-ordination Action


Specific support actions s l.jpg

to assist in the mapping and development of the definition of the field in question, assessing future development prospects and trends in the field.

to discuss the contextual aspects of the measurement (social, institutional, economic, political, etc)

to re-think assumptions about measuring systems and how uncertainties are treated.

Measuring the impossible

Specific Support Actions (s)


Slide53 l.jpg

1 of the field in question, assessing future development prospects and trends in the field.st Call

Results:

2 CA

0

0

30 proposals

It corresponds to 50% of PATHFINDER submissions

4 SSA

6

24 STREP

(20% success rate / ~ 11M€ )


Slide54 l.jpg

1 of the field in question, assessing future development prospects and trends in the field.st Call

Recommended PROJECTS

BioEmergences – towards the measurement of the individual susceptibility to diseases or responses to treatments

BrainTuning – to resolve the neural determinants of music emotions. What are the biological determinants of music appreciation?

Closed – Objective measurement of functional-aesthetic sound qualities of artefacts

Fuga - Measuring the human experience of media enjoyment – the fun of gaming

MONAT – Measurement of Naturalness

SysPAQ – Measurement of perceived air quality


Measuring the impossible55 l.jpg

Measuring the impossible of the field in question, assessing future development prospects and trends in the field.

Ethical Issues:

Use of animals and GMOs (replacement, reduction, refinement) / research with children and infants

Informed consent procedures

Personal data protection and anonymisation

Long term storage of sensitive data

Social implications of research


Scientific areas involved 1 l.jpg
Scientific areas involved (1) of the field in question, assessing future development prospects and trends in the field.

e.g.

BioEmergences (6 academic + 1 industrial partner) biology, toxicology, computational vision, applied mathematics, cognitive science, computer science, optics/physics)

BrainTuning (6 academic partners) cognitive neuroscience, computational modelling, music acoustics, neuroimaging, psychology, music perception)

CLOSED(3 academic + 1 industrial partners) – acoustics, computer science, signal processing, neurosciences,


Scientific areas involved 2 l.jpg
Scientific areas involved (2) of the field in question, assessing future development prospects and trends in the field.

e.g.

FUGA (6 academic partners) applied psychology, computer science, human-computer interaction, communication, psychotherapy, experimental psychobiology, media technology

MONAT (6 academic + 1 industrial partners) cognitive neurosciences, psychology, metrology, mathematical modelling, sensor technology, neuroimaging

SysPAQ (7 academic + 3 industrial partners) aerodynamics, civil engineering, sensory perception, psychology, materials, analytical chemistry, instrumentation, indoor climate technology


Slide58 l.jpg

Feedback for first call of the field in question, assessing future development prospects and trends in the field.

( + )

  • Successful call with many interesting projects integrating different fields of science

  • Projects of very high quality with the participation of highly renown institutions and scientists

( - )

  • A topic as complex as “Measuring the Impossible“ needs time to develop

  • Some problems with the scope and the instruments


Feedback for first call l.jpg
Feedback for of the field in question, assessing future development prospects and trends in the field.first call

  • CA - (2) - complexity; cluster of 3 STREPs

  • SSA - (4) - research with one or two partners

  • STREP – (18)

  • (NO Relevance + YES excellence) - 2

  • (~ Relevance + ~ excellence) - 5

  • (OK Relev + ~ excellence - 4

  • (NO Relev + NO excellence - 7


Second call l.jpg

Focussed on perception/interpretation of the field in question, assessing future development prospects and trends in the field.

Problems => last call => resubmissions

tailoring

Second call


Measuring the impossible61 l.jpg

Measuring the impossible of the field in question, assessing future development prospects and trends in the field.

We are looking forward to the measurement environment in 20 years, which is expected to involve a strong component of interpretation and perception

“Hard and soft sciences interdisciplinarity should be developed and the distances and similarities between them urgently discussed”

Measuring the Impossible is a good example and a fantastic opportunity to create excellence is a very interdisciplinary topic


Slide62 l.jpg

www.cordis.lu/nest of the field in question, assessing future development prospects and trends in the field.

PATHFINDER initiative on

Cultural Dynamics

from transmission and change to innovation

Shamila NAIR-BEDOUELLE

2005


Cultural dynamics from transmission and change to innovation l.jpg

Outcome of topic selection process over the last year (“structured dialogue” - full details on NEST web site)

Cultural Dynamics: from transmission and change to innovation


Why this initiative64 l.jpg

Why this initiative ? (“structured dialogue” - full details on NEST web site)

  • Culture impacts all sectors of human life (poverty, global change, education etc)

  • Interactions between culture and technology : global communication networks, media

  • Objective is to develop better scientific tools and methods to understand culture transmission, change and innovation.


What research will be pursued l.jpg

What research will be pursued ? (“structured dialogue” - full details on NEST web site)

  • Research including the cognitive correlates of cultural phenomena: culture control vs. resistance; effects of cultural variables on behaviour ;

  • Interactions between cultural markets: public policies, trade integration, culture and power

  • Interactions between culture and technology; Cultural changes brought about by modern technologies (influence and resistance to these)

  • Research on new predictive models linking and understanding diverse phenomena: health epidemics, consumer behaviour, economic markets, social networks


What research will not be pursued66 l.jpg

What research will NOT be pursued ? (“structured dialogue” - full details on NEST web site)

  • Pure empirical research

  • Single component data collections e.g. social behaviour

  • Classical research on cognitive systems in general

  • Research which could be carried out under the TPs

  • Research which is mono-disciplinary


Specific target research projects streps67 l.jpg

The research supported by this initiative through (“structured dialogue” - full details on NEST web site) Specific Targeted Research Projects will be aimed at bringing together from different fields of science, technology, the social sciences and humanities, concepts, data and analytical methods, to promote a better understanding and predictive capacity relating to transmission, change and innovation in human culture.

Specific Target Research Projects (STREPs)


Co ordination action68 l.jpg

Proposals for (“structured dialogue” - full details on NEST web site)Co-ordination Actions are strongly encouraged. They should focus on cross-disciplinary networking, in relation to particular areas of cultural dynamics, or particular research methods or analytical approaches.

Networking of European activities in relevant fields

Co-ordination Action


Specific support actions l.jpg

To assist in the mapping and development of the definition of the field in question, assessing future development prospects and trends in the field.

Specific Support Actions


Pathfinder initiative on what it means to be human shamila nair bedouelle 2005 l.jpg

www.cordis.lu/nest of the field in question, assessing future development prospects and trends in the field.

PATHFINDER initiative on

“What it means to be human”

Shamila NAIR-BEDOUELLE

2005


Slide71 l.jpg

Overall objectives of the field in question, assessing future development prospects and trends in the field.

  • This initiative aims to investigate why humans are different:

    • What features make our cognitive abilities unique?

    • What are the origins of these features?

  • Why this question?:

    • Today, a more integrated understanding of the human mind/brain and its specific features should open up new scientific opportunities

    • It provides a way to bring together cognitive sciences and related disciplinary areas that can all contribute to explore the opportunities at the interface


Scientific objectives l.jpg

Projects may have different individual objectives.  However, they must address “what features make human cognitive abilities unique, and what are the origins of these features?” 

focus on higher cognitive faculties, (thinking, reasoning, using language) and individual cognitive development (in the context of social and cultural factors)

take a comparative and evolutionary perspective

be highly interdisciplinary

In all cases however, the research must address the key question: why are humans different?

Scientific objectives


Results l.jpg
Results However, they must address

2 CAs

1 SSA

24 submissions

21 STREPs / 8 funded

~13.5 Mio. €

  • SSA : ineligible

  • 2 CA‘s: not retained for funding

  • STREPS Scientific projects:

  • 9 Cognitive science

  • 7 Neuroscience

  • 3 Anthropology

  • 2 Linguistics


Examples of projects and scientific areas involved l.jpg
Examples of projects and scientific areas involved However, they must address

ABSTRACT:

The formation and use of abstract concepts by humans. Research will focus on how abstract concepts in different languages and cultures are represented in the mind/brain and how they are learnt during childhood.

ChLaSc:

What makes us smart? Focussing on structural complexity in language acquisition and other cognitive systems e.g.natural numbers.

Paul Broca II:

Neural and genetic features that distinguish Homo sapiens; human brain asymmetry : link to language and genes


Slide75 l.jpg

Conclusions However, they must address

  • Successful second call, transcdiciplinary integrative projects

  • Already have a critical mass of projects from the previous 2 calls

  • Therefore : Would like to have a CA or CAs to coordinate and bring together people in areas of ongoing research

  • Next call: only CAs and SSAs

  • Commission set up an Expert Group to examine new scientific opportunities and assess the potential for a concerted research program in this area (Brochures)


ad