Monitoring genetic change in natural populations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Slide1 l.jpg
1 / 58

  • Updated On :
  • Presentation posted in: Pets / Animals

Monitoring genetic change in natural populations. Michael S. Schwartz U.S. Forest Service Fred W. Allendorf University of Montana. First Working Group jointly funded by NCEAS & NESCent. Initial meeting in March 2008. Objectives of Working Group

Related searches for Monitoring genetic change in natural populations

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

Download Presentation

Monitoring genetic change in natural populations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

Slide1 l.jpg

Monitoring genetic change in natural populations

Michael S. SchwartzU.S. Forest Service

Fred W. AllendorfUniversity of Montana

Slide2 l.jpg

First Working Group jointly funded by NCEAS & NESCent.

Initial meeting in March 2008.

Slide3 l.jpg

Objectives of Working Group

(1) Provide practical guidelines for resource managers and policy makers to design genetic programs to monitor population trends and processes.

(2) Evaluate potential to use genetic monitoring of candidate genes likely to be affected by climate change, and other types of stress, to understand evolutionary responses to environmental changes.

Slide5 l.jpg

Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22:25-33. 2007.

We define genetic monitoring as quantifying

temporal changes in population genetic metrics or other population data.

We distinguish monitoring, which must have a temporal dimension, from assessment, which reflects a snapshot of population characteristics at a single point in time.

Slide6 l.jpg

Population Genetics in Space & Time

Space: Describing patterns of genetic variation among geographical populations.

FST,heterozygosity, allelic diversity

Time: Describing changes in patterns of genetic variation among samples collected at different times from a single site.

Fk, etc.

Slide7 l.jpg

Schwartz et al. 2007

Slide8 l.jpg

Schwartz et al. 2007

Slide9 l.jpg

Class III:

Detect and monitor adaptation (e.g., response to climate change) using candidate genes

Using genetic markers to predict and monitor climate change in insects

Carla Sgro & Ary Hoffmann

Slide10 l.jpg

  • Three Examples

  • Class I: Detecting recolonization of lynx in Minnesota.

  • Class II: Estimation of effective population size in Swedish brown trout.

  • (3) Use of historical DNA to monitor genetic variation and manage grizzly bears in the Yellowstone Ecosystem (YE).

Slide12 l.jpg

Genetics of Lynx in


Schwartz et al. 2004

Slide13 l.jpg

  • Lynx Listed as Threatened

  • in March 2000

  • Species occurs on 110

  • Million acres of USFS land

  • Elusive, Patchily Distrib.,

  • cyclic in abundance

  • In MN they were absent

  • from 1993-2001

Slide14 l.jpg

Last verified


McKelvey et al. 2000

Slide15 l.jpg

How do we confirm lynx’s return

to Minnesota after 10 yr absence?


Can we monitor the population

using DNA?

Slide16 l.jpg

Our Approach

  • Between 2002 - 2006 backtracked

  • “putative lynx”

Schwartz et al. 2004

McKelvey et al. 2006

Slide17 l.jpg

Track Surveys

2002 - 2006 back-tracked

“putative” lynx

Slide18 l.jpg


Collected 263 scats and hairs (and tissue)

Goal was to identify to species,

then individual

Schwartz et al. 2004

Slide19 l.jpg

Lynx in Minnesota

263 samples

94.1% success scat / 70.0% success hair

157 confirmed lynx

Schwartz et al. Unpub.

Slide20 l.jpg

Lynx in Minnesota

But is it 157 Individuals or Less?

Schwartz et al. Unpub.

Slide21 l.jpg

Focus on ~100-200bp




Sample 1

Sample 2

Sample 3

Sample 4

Sample 5

Sample 6

Sample 7

Sample 8


DNA Panel

Slide22 l.jpg

94 Unique lynx

Slide24 l.jpg

Genetic Tools Also Provide Gender Identification

Pilgrim et al. 2005

Slide25 l.jpg

These Data Can be Turned Into a Corrected Index

Slide26 l.jpg

All Metrics Suggest that Lynx are

Increasing, But Indices may be

Effort Sensitive

Slide28 l.jpg

Lynx Effective Pop. Size (Same Raw Data)

  • Effort less imp.

Methods: Tallmon et al. 2005, Tallmon et al. In Prep.

Slide29 l.jpg

All Metrics Point to Same Trend

Slide31 l.jpg

Conservation Genetics 4:249-264. 2003.

Slide32 l.jpg

EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE (Ne) is the size of the ideal population (N) that will result in the same amount of genetic drift as in the actual population being considered.

per generation:∆ h = -1/2N = F

Ne can be estimated by using changes in allele frequencies over time to estimate F.

Slide33 l.jpg

Sampled 100 fish from two sites annually from 1980-2000.

Identified cohorts using otoliths to determine age.

Examined 17 polymorphic allozyme loci

Slide34 l.jpg

Geography: FST = 0.13 (stable over time)

Temporal changes:

Fk = based upon mean allele frequency change between consecutive cohorts (overlapping generations)

Slide35 l.jpg


II Ne=48

I Ne=19

Point estimates of Ne for pairs of consecutive cohorts are relatively stable over time.

Slide37 l.jpg

(3) Use of genetic monitoring to manage grizzly bears



Slide38 l.jpg

Why do Yellowstone Ecosystem bears (YE) have 21% less nuclear heterozygosity and 61% less mtDNA diversity compared to the nearby Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem (NCDE) bears?

Slide39 l.jpg

Continuous habitat

~150 km

Slide40 l.jpg

Time Travel: The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) allows using historical or ancient DNA to detect genetic changes (or lack thereof) by going back in time using museum specimens or other sources of DNA (seed banks, fish scales, etc.).

Miller & Waits (2003) used bone from museum specimens of grizzly bear skulls to extract DNA.

Slide41 l.jpg

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:4334-4339. 2003.

A, B, or C???

Slide42 l.jpg

And the answer is -

Het: 0.564 0.560 0.544

Ne ~ 75

Ne ~ 50

Slide43 l.jpg

Ongoing Genetic Monitoring

Continued genetic screening of YE grizzly bears with microsatellite loci to detect migrant individuals using “assignment” tests to identify population of origin based upon genotype (YE or NCDE; FST =0.12)

If no genetic exchange is detected by 2020, two bears will be translocated every generation (10 years) from the NCDE to the YE.

Slide44 l.jpg

1 FebIntroduction – Schwartz & Allendorf8 Feb15 FebMonitoring of Ne - Gordon Luikart22 FebSnake River cutthroat trout - Mark Novak29 Feb Happy Birthday Janean!7 Mar 14 Mar21 Mar----4 Apr11 Apr18 Apr25 Apr2 May

  • Login