1 / 23

FMP Technology Working Group Update

FMP Technology Working Group Update. Jerzy Komorowski Hany Moustapha. Outline. FMP Technology Working Group Technology Matrix Technology Demonstrators Airbus Boeing EU FP-7 engagement and CSA CANAPE. FMP Technology WG.

Mia_John
Download Presentation

FMP Technology Working Group Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. FMP Technology Working Group Update Jerzy Komorowski Hany Moustapha

  2. Outline • FMP Technology Working Group • Technology Matrix • Technology Demonstrators • Airbus • Boeing • EU FP-7 engagement and CSA • CANAPE

  3. FMP Technology WG • Workshop held in January in Montreal to update the Technology Matrix by 3 sub- groups (Aerostructures, Engines, Airborne Systems). • Leadership of sub-groups finalised: • David O’Connor, Magellan • Frederic Lefbvre, PWC • Philippe Molaret, Thales Canada

  4. FMP Technology WG All sub-groups have worked independently to redefine their Technology Demonstrator Proposals. Target cost for each sub-group TDP - $40M/$40M (private/public) Target date – end November 2010

  5. FMP Airframe Working Group Progress Summary Prepared: 18 Oct, 2010

  6. WG Participants Coordinator: Dave O’Connor, Magellan Aerospace (Bristol Aerospace Ltd.) Team Members:

  7. WG Progress Task 1: Refine Technology Matrix • A meeting was held to identify common priorities among the WG participants with respect to technology development and demonstration • Specific areas of interest were down-selected from the general Priority Technologies Matrix (previously published in June 2009 FMP report) • A summary of the final results was prepared and circulated among participants (refer to table on following slide for an overview) Status: Completed – September, 2010

  8. WG Progress Task 2: Develop Tech Demo Project Proposals • A standard template was developed to facilitate the collection of project ideas from within the WG • Individual organizations were requested to prepare project proposals reflecting each group’s technology priorities – participants were encouraged to work together in the development of collaborative proposals • Original deadline for submission of project ideas was 1 Oct – subsequently extended at the request of the participants to allow additional time for proposal preparation • Currently expect to receive submissions by end of Oct (anticipate 13 – 15 projects) Status: On-Going Next Steps: WG meeting to be held early Nov to review submissions and decide on way forward

  9. NEXT GENERATION GREEN ENGINE DEMONSTRATOR (NGGED) Future Major Platform (FMP) Intégrateur: Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Leader: Frederic Lefebvre Progress update, Oct. 25, 2010 P&WC Proprietary Information

  10. STATUS (Oct. 25, 2010) Original proposal in December 2008 Green Technology Demonstrator (GTD) - Full core demonstrator - SFC, Emission and weight reduction - Advanced green manufacturing technologies Quebec “AvionEcologique” program start in April 2010 Support the compressor development of the GTD GTD project was redefined in October 2010, in line with FMP Technology Matrix and P&WC future product needs to respond to major OEMs Next Generation Green Engine Demo “NGGED” : $80M over 3 years Potential partners/collaborators identified Next steps validate their interest

  11. P&WC NEXT GENERATION PRODUCT VISION Leveraging Core and Integration Technologies -30 to -40% Base TF (Current RJ Engines) Relative Fuel Burn NGRT -13% to 21% Base Turboprop (Existing Fleet) -2 to -3% -28% Advanced cycle Advanced architecture Integrated Prop/RGB -2 to -4% Material and coating development Cooling technology (RMC) Continued Integration More Electric technology NGRT is required to preserve turboprop competitiveness

  12. NGGED Benefits • Secure the Next Generation Regional Turboprop applications • Help secure the single aisle market (A320 and B737 replacement) • Preserve turboprop long term competitiveness • Reduce mission fuel burn by 15% to 20% over the existing turboprop fleet • Increase power/weight by up to 30% • Reduce emission level to 50% of the equivalent future regulations • Reduce product and operating cost • Improve engine manufacturing and assembly flow • Ensure Canadian supply chain readiness

  13. NGGED EIGHT PROJECTS ($80M over 3 Years) • Advanced combustion technology ($20M) • Advanced compressor-combustion integration ($8M) • Turbine advanced aerodynamic and cooling technologies ($14M) • Advanced rotor materials and coating technologies ($8M) • More Electric Architecture ($10M) • Hybrid RGB configuration ($8M) • Advanced and lean manufacturing and assembly processes ($8M) • Advanced composite materials ($4M)

  14. École Polytechnique Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières L’École de Technologie Supérieure Integran Avcorp-Comtek Goodwrich MDS-PWC University of British Columbia Howmet Laval, Georgetown Air Data Inc Concordia University Hamilton Sundstrand National Research Council (NRC) United Technologies Research Centre (UTRC) Mesotec University of Toronto WSK Magellan Hispano-Suiza GREEN TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATORPotential Partners and Suppliers Potential partners/suppliers identified and to be validated

  15. FMP technology – company mapping Early 2010 FMP technology matrix was updated by all sub-groups Under NDA signed in October 2009 Airbus provided confidential technology needs information for FMP to NRC, IC. NRC Aerospace (IAR, IRAP) and IC have developed a confidential list of companies in Canada relevant to the Airbus needs. AIAC has been encouraging these companies to join FMP TDPs Airbus is working on ways to develop a path for lower tiers to Airbus new programs.

  16. EU FP7 Engagement and CSA Mr. Liam Breslin, Head of Unit, Aeronautics Research, Directorate, General for Research and Technological Development, European Commission visit to Canada in June 2010. Meetings with AIAC, IC, NRC, DRDC, DFAIT in Ottawa Meetings with Industry, CRAIQ, AQA, AeroMontreal in Montreal Vists to PWC, CAE, Bell and Bombardier

  17. EU FP7 Engagement and CSA Industry Canada and NRC to lead and coordinate Canadian efforts with help from DFAIT in Brussels and Ottawa. Mr. Liam Breslin, lecture in Canada Pavilion at Farnborough Air Show. Coordinated Support Action (CSA) announced – EU funding for activities to help identify and set up EU – Canada collaborations under FP7

  18. EU FP7 Engagement and CSA • Attendance at various information gathering events to understand the CSA approach and to build relationships (Farnborough Air show, Transport Days in Brussels, Can EU JSTCC, etc.) • Circulation of latest call for research proposals to GARDN, AeroMontreal, NRC, CRIAQ • Canadian - EU team to develop proposal established (led in EU by UK) • Canadian CSA proposal “core team” and “steering committee” terms of reference developed in coordination with EU partners • Canadian CSA proposal “core team” established: NRC, IC, DFAIT, NSERC, AIAC • Canadian CSA proposal “steering Committee” scoped out – not confirmed yet • Preliminary draft of CSA proposal under discussion • Preliminary budget for Canadian side developed • Questionnaire to Canadian Industry (AIAC AGM) developed • Results of questionnaire will help us determine how aggressively we continue to pursue this initiative.

  19. Activities to include: - workshops, road shows and meetings - Studies, fact finding, monitoring, - Strategy development, - Working or expert groups, - Involvement of industry, organsiations and academia - Operational support, data access and dissemination, Information and communication activities Cooperation with other European research schemes ( No technical research / development / demo activities…) * Max. EU funding : 300 k€ + Canadian contributione.g. in kind * Typically up to 2 yearduration CANNAPE(CANadian Networking Aerospace Project for Europe) Competition under FP7: Exploring opportunities and stimulating research cooperation with Canada Dr. Gill Richards co-ordinator

  20. Expected Impact of CANNAPE • Form a European awareness of Canadian aerospace capabilities. • Produce a Technology Roadmap for strategic alignment. • Dissemination of CANNAPE material by road shows, workshops and websites. • Increase Canadian/European collaboration in joint projects.

More Related