1 / 11

Michael J. Dickstein Stanford University NET Institute Conference on Network Economics

“ To Belong or to Be Different? Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment in China ” by Monic Sun, Xiaoquan Zhang, Feng Zhu. Michael J. Dickstein Stanford University NET Institute Conference on Network Economics June 7, 2013. Outline. Experimental Design Simple model of behavior

Mia_John
Download Presentation

Michael J. Dickstein Stanford University NET Institute Conference on Network Economics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. “To Belong or to Be Different? Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment in China ”by Monic Sun, Xiaoquan Zhang, FengZhu Michael J. Dickstein Stanford University NET Institute Conference on Network Economics June 7, 2013

  2. Outline • Experimental Design • Simple model of behavior • Comments on empirical approach • Summary data • Implications of findings Michael J. Dickstein, Stanford University

  3. Experimental Design • Key Idea 1: Escape the classic “reflection” problem described by Manski (1993) • “reflection” problem: difficulty of inferring whether the average behavior in a group influences the behavior of individuals that comprise that group • Authors’ solution: randomize information on peers Michael J. Dickstein, Stanford University

  4. Experimental Design • Key Idea 2: Use data from choices on a social network platform; agent’s decisions are subject to evaluation by peers • Key Idea 3: Agents shown message “Most popular color is X with Y%”, where X = color not equal to initial choice • Key Idea 4: Randomize whether the experimental message includes a reminder that choice is public Michael J. Dickstein, Stanford University

  5. Simple model of behavior • Utility • Current (implicit): “Best color” depends on preference for convergence/divergence • Value from color of virtual home • Bayesian updating • Prob0,c(“best color”) -> choice • Prob0,c(“best color”) + signal -> Prob1,c(“best color”) -> choice • Identity of “best color” transmitted in signal may matter Michael J. Dickstein, Stanford University

  6. Simple model of behavior • Specifically: • If new information comes close to priors, leads to little adjustment (no switch). • If new information differs from priors, may lead to switch • In simple Bayesian setting, increasing the percentage of the majority color affects the updating process in a monotonic way Michael J. Dickstein, Stanford University

  7. Simple model of behavior • But, we observe a non-monotonic probability of convergence as the rate of adoption increases • Recent work: “Ego” utility consequences, Eiland Rao (2011): • Subjects receiving negative feedback on their intelligence and beauty were far less predictable in their updating behavior and exhibited an aversion to new information • In response to good news, inference more closely followed to Bayes’ Rule (as in the neutral experimental condition) Michael J. Dickstein, Stanford University

  8. Comments on Empirical Approach • Data • To external validity: who are the users of the Virtual Homes app and Kaixin more generally? Likely to be least conformist? Michael J. Dickstein, Stanford University

  9. Comments on Empirical Approach • Data • To external validity: who are the users of the Virtual Homes app and Kaixin more generally? Likely to be least conformist? • Is there a natural taxonomy to the colors {yellow, green, pink, blue, red, gray}? • Unconditional choice probabilities at initial choice • Correlations between initial choice and individual characteristics? Michael J. Dickstein, Stanford University

  10. Comments on Empirical Approach • Data • To external validity: who are the users of the Virtual Homes app and Kaixin more generally? Likely to be least conformist? • Is there a natural taxonomy to the colors {yellow, green, pink, blue, red, gray}? • Unconditional choice probabilities at initial choice • Correlations between initial choice and individual characteristics? • Balance in the demographic covariates by randomized majority share? Michael J. Dickstein, Stanford University

  11. Comments on Empirical Approach • Implications? • Validity for payoff-relevant choices? • Ex. Physicians choice of treatment regime • Exploit decisions after receiving signal to identify “non-conformists”. Valuable for tailoring marketing campaigns. Michael J. Dickstein, Stanford University

More Related