1 / 20

Post-Award Issues for the Pre-Award Administrator

Post-Award Issues for the Pre-Award Administrator. Panelists: Tim Leung Senior Research Accountant Stanford University Craig Johnson Compliance Analyst University of Washington Csilla M. Csaplár Contract & Grant Officer Stanford University. Agenda.

Lucy
Download Presentation

Post-Award Issues for the Pre-Award Administrator

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Post-Award Issues for the Pre-Award Administrator Panelists: Tim Leung Senior Research Accountant Stanford University Craig Johnson Compliance Analyst University of Washington Csilla M. Csaplár Contract & Grant Officer Stanford University

  2. Agenda • Discussion of common issues (and solutions) that arise during proposal development and award stage that impact post-award • Terms and conditions to avoid • Ways to be proactive! • Building the bridge between pre-award and post-award to facilitate effective project management

  3. Budgets • Identify Cost Categories • Unidentified costs • May require sponsor approval for rebudgeting • Bottom line: Not in the budget? Ask. • Personnel Costs: Proposal vs. Expenditures • Materials/Supplies vs. Equipment • Subawards vs. subcontracts • Correct rates applied

  4. Budgets, continued • Budget projections • Impacts of poor planning: • Loss of direct cost funding available to the project • Loss of F&A/indirect cost recovery • Disallowances • Open communication reduces potential for: • Excessive, inappropriate, or late cost transfers • Manual adjustments • Disallowances • Revised invoices/financial reports • Audit findings • Loss of expanded authorities or letter of credit drawdown eligibility

  5. Awards • Award classification – award type, award instrument, sponsor type • Single PI vs. Multiple PIs • One shared account or separate accounts for each? • PIs from different departments/divisions • Access? Controls? • Budget years vs. cumulative project period • Separate accounts? • Is carryforward automatic or is prior approval required?

  6. Award Notices • Identify important information that post-award will need • Payment terms or schedule • Financial reporting requirements and timelines • PO or award number to be included on invoice • Restrictions • Milestones

  7. Award Set-up • Interest earned • Return to sponsor? • Use toward the project? • For use at institution’s discretion? • Tracking • Reporting • Interest Income • Tracked separately from revenue • Recorded as income, not expense • Cost sharing

  8. Award Set-up, continued • Period of Performance dates • Effective date vs. execution date • Funding authorizations • Budget periods • Incremental funding • Supplemental funding • Impacts allowability of expenditures • Rebudgeting • Institutional policy • Sponsor policy/prior approval requirements • Impacts ability to get reimbursed and project planning

  9. Billing/Invoicing • Invoicing • Format and documentation • Standard or Sponsor-specific? • Back up documentation required (negotiate!) • Tied to award type - Cost reimbursement or fixed price • Frequency • CR: in arrears monthly, quarterly, semi-annually, annually? • FP: up-front, per milestones reached, at completion? • Combination: tied to progress or deliverables?

  10. Payment Terms • Upon execution/initiation • Fixed schedule of installments • Milestone payments • Upon completion/termination • Withholding of percentage or amount • Net 30 standard • Non-standard can impact institution’s cash flow • Advances/refunds

  11. Reporting Requirements • Technical • Progress/interim • Final • Financial • SF 269 and SF 270 for federal awards • Sponsor-specific forms for others • Timeframe for submission – at least 60 days preferable • Who is responsible – department? Central post-award? • Be timely! Timely report submission impacts A/R, relationship between central offices with responsibility/oversight, and PI/institution’s reputation with sponsor • Delinquent reports may cause sponsors to withhold funding on all awards • Your institution may be identified as “not responsible”; can impact future competitions

  12. Sponsor Approvals • Rebudgeting • Carryforward • Change of PI or level of effort • Pre-award spending • Flowdowns – additional oversight

  13. Compliance Requirements • Waivers (PI effort, indirect costs) • Human/animals subjects approvals • Cost-sharing • Conflict of Interest • Impacts level of risk to PI, department, and institution

  14. Sticky Award Terms • Publication • Restrictions • Impacts: restriction on ability to disseminate research results • Export controls • Acceptance of controlled or proprietary technology, items covered by EAR/ITAR • Impact: loss of fundamental research exclusion • Intellectual property • Disclosure internally and to sponsor • Ownership • Impacts: loss of ability to file provisional patents, legal battles over inventorship if proper disclosures not made • Legal terms (indemnification, venue, governing law, etc.)

  15. Closeout • Meet with PIs before the grant period is over • Develop a process • Use checklists to track items of special concern (i.e. cost-sharing, unliquidated encumbrances, final invention statements, etc.) • Contact your grant accounting team in advance • Avoid “first among equals” thinking

  16. Terms to Avoid • Detailed financial reporting and back-up documentation • Payments or reporting in non-U.S. dollars • Reporting deadlines on end date of award (60 days after end date preferred) • Final invoicing deadline less than 45 days after end date • Monthly interim financial reporting • Return of all award funds if project is terminated early • Any restrictions on publication • Others?

  17. Be Proactive! • Training • PIs: Explain the process and your expectations, answer questions • Department administrators: Understand their role and the relationship with the PI, help facilitate the process with both • Encourage them to take advantage of training opportunities • Acting on behalf of the Institution • Explain the impacts of a poorly planned budget or a rushed proposal • Remind your team and your departments that you have their interests and those of the institution in mind • Get to know your neighborhood • Meet your customers! • Know who does what and who can help during a crisis • Be patient – and be a resource!

  18. Collaborative Solutions What Pre-award can do: • Serve as the primary point of contact for the PI, department, and sponsor • Learn about and anticipate the needs of your post-award counterparts • Understand impacts of award terms and conditions so you can negotiate the best deal for all the players • Educate your post-award counterpart on project specifics • Communicate often, and keep people apprised of your expectations • Recognize sponsor restrictions and special requirements, negotiate to standardize when it makes sense and is possible • Realize restrictions of institution’s systems, work to accommodate whenever possible

  19. Collaborative Solutions What Post-award can do: • Understand award terms and conditions, and how to adhere to them • Interact regularly, not just when there are fires to be put out • Ask questions – communication is key • Be flexible! Not all sponsors and awards are created equal.

  20. Questions? Tim Leung Senior Research Accountant, Stanford University tnleung@stanford.edu Craig Johnson Compliance Analyst, University of Washington erfalas@u.washington.edu Csilla M. Csaplár Contract & Grant Officer, Stanford University csaplar@stanford.edu With thanks to Marti Dunne, New York University, and Diane Barrett, University of Wisconsin.

More Related