Inter organizational network analysis a systems approach to health research practice
Download
1 / 37

Inter-organizational network analysis: A systems approach to health research practice - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 638 Views
  • Uploaded on

Inter-organizational network analysis: A systems approach to health research & practice. Center for Tobacco Policy Research Saint Louis University School of Public Health Douglas Luke, PhD Jenine Harris, MA .

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Inter-organizational network analysis: A systems approach to health research practice' - LionelDale


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Inter organizational network analysis a systems approach to health research practice l.jpg

Inter-organizational network analysis: A systems approach to health research & practice

Center for Tobacco Policy Research

Saint Louis University

School of Public Health

Douglas Luke, PhD

Jenine Harris, MA


Slide2 l.jpg


Context dependency of health behavior l.jpg
Context dependency of health behavior of philosophic thinking goes back to neglect of context.


From systems theory to health promotion via organizational networks l.jpg
From systems theory to health promotion via organizational networks

  • Society must be reconceptualized as a complex network of groups of interacting individuals whose membership and communication patterns are seldom confined to one such group alone.

    • —Diana Crane, Invisible Colleges (1972)

  • Health promotion activities (such as tobacco control) can be seen as a complex network of individuals, groups, and organizations.

  • Network analysis is a tool that connects systems theory to health promotion.


  • Definition l.jpg
    Definition networks

    • An inter-organizational network is a social structure that connects a collective: group, community, agency, organization, etc.

    • The connection can be of many types: communication, transmission, affiliation.

    • The connection can be about many things: money, knowledge, relationship, influence.


    Katrina failure of inter organizational networks l.jpg
    Katrina – Failure of inter-organizational networks networks

    • Inability to communicate between first responders from different agencies

    • Conflicts and poor communication between levels of government (federal, state, local)

    • Difficulty integrating private aid and voluntary efforts into official Katrina response







    Three examples l.jpg
    Three examples networks

    • Identifying the core tobacco control program ‘blueprint’

    • Charting how inter-organizational networks change in response to challenging fiscal and political conditions

    • Mapping federal tobacco control leadership to aid in strategic planning


    Example 1 identifying tc organizational blueprint l.jpg
    Example 1 – Identifying TC organizational blueprint networks

    • Use network analysis to examine communication, partnership networks to identify commonalities, differences

    • Use a technique called block-modeling to identify and present common underlying inter-organizational patterns

    • Examine fit of individual states to the general blueprint



    Contact network l.jpg
    Contact Network networks


    Integration network l.jpg

    Cooperation networks

    Collaboration

    Not Linked

    Communication

    Coordination

    Partnership

    Fully linked or integrated

    Integration Network

    Not linked or integrated at all- We do not work together at all and have separate program goals.

    Communication- We share information only when it is advantageous to either or both programs.

    Cooperation- We share information and work together when any opportunity arises.

    Coordination- We work side-by-side as separate organizations to achieve common program goals.(e.g., efforts are coordinated to prevent overlap but perform our tasks as separate organizations)

    Collaboration- We work side-by side and actively pursue opportunities to work together as an informal team. (e.g., attempt to find ways to work together but do not establish a formal agreement or contract- “in the spirit of collaboration”)

    Partnership- We work together as a formal team with specified responsibilities to achieve common program goals. (e.g., have formally identified common goals and areas of responsibility for each organization, usually outlined in a Memorandum of Understandingor other type of agreement)

    Fully linked or integrated- We mutually plan, share staff and/or funding resources and evaluate activities to accomplish our common goals.

    Based on the continuum below, please choose the response that best describes the current relationship between your agency and…



    Florida oregon contact l.jpg
    Florida & Oregon Contact networks

    Florida 2004

    Oregon 2004





    Example 2 charting inter organizational network changes l.jpg
    Example 2 – Charting inter-organizational network changes general blueprint

    • What happens to TC networks when funding is cut, or political support changes?

    • Collect organizational network data at multiple timepoints

    • Examine how changes may be in response to external conditions


    Indiana l.jpg
    Indiana general blueprint

    FY04

    FY05

    FY03

    Stability

    73%

    Stability

    97%

    Stability

    --

    --

    Density

    Density

    Density

    0.61

    0.48

    0.59

    Betweenness

    Betweenness

    Betweenness

    0.14

    0.30

    0.23

    $850M State Budget Deficit

    $33.8M Tobacco Control Funding

    $595M State Budget Deficit

    $300M State Budget Deficit

    $18.2M Tobacco Control Funding

    $12.4M Tobacco Control Funding


    Indiana 2003 l.jpg

    FY03 general blueprint

    Stability

    --

    Density

    0.61

    Betweenness

    0.14

    Indiana 2003


    Indiana 2004 l.jpg

    FY04 general blueprint

    Stability

    73%

    --

    Density

    0.48

    Betweenness

    0.30

    Indiana 2004


    Indiana 2005 l.jpg

    FY05 general blueprint

    Stability

    97%

    Density

    0.59

    Betweenness

    0.23

    Indiana 2005


    Example 3 mapping the us dhhs tobacco control leadership l.jpg
    Example 3 - Mapping the US DHHS tobacco control leadership general blueprint

    The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) is responsible for planning, guiding, and funding much of the tobacco control and research activity in the US. The activities are carried out within various DHHS agencies.

    The aim of this Project was to create a map of the tobacco control leadership within the US DHHS. Using social network analysis, we:

    • Identified the tobacco control leadership network within DHHS

    • Described five different relational networks within DHHS

    • Identified individuals who play unique or critical roles in the networks

    • Identified knowledge and communication gaps in the networks

    • Examined the characteristics of the networks

      A map of this sort is important to guide strategic planning for tobacco policy by identifying strengths and challenges related to intra- and inter- agency awareness, communication, and partnerships.


    Participating agencies l.jpg
    Participating Agencies general blueprint

    • Administration for Children and Families (ACF)

    • Agency for Healthcare Research Quality (AHRQ)

    • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

    • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)

    • Food & Drug Administration (FDA)

    • Health Resource and Services Administration (HRSA)

    • Indian Health Services (IHS)

    • National Institutes of Health (NIH)

    • National Cancer Institutes (NCI)

    • Office of the General Counsel (OGC)

    • Office of the Secretary (OS)

    • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)


    Methods and survey items l.jpg
    Methods and Survey Items general blueprint

    Respondents were asked to answer five questions about their colleagues and other DHHS agencies in tobacco control. The responses to these questions were used to develop five networks in five areas:

    • Awareness of tobacco work

    • Contact frequency

    • Formal partnerships

    • Individual influence

    • Agency importance

      We used a web-based survey to collect data; the response rate was 92.5% (50/54 respondents).


    Awareness network l.jpg
    Awareness Network general blueprint


    Contact network32 l.jpg
    Contact Network general blueprint


    Collapsed contact network l.jpg
    Collapsed Contact Network general blueprint


    Inter intra agency contact l.jpg
    Inter & Intra Agency Contact general blueprint


    What we found l.jpg
    What we found general blueprint

    • There is a high degree of awareness of tobacco work among individuals across all agencies in DHHS.

    • CDC, OS, and NCI play central roles in the tobacco leadership networks.

    • The network maps reveal communication and partnership gaps that might be addressed by future DHHS strategic planning.

    • This type of network analysis is a useful tool for revealing interorganizational capacity.


    Why should you care l.jpg
    Why should you care? general blueprint

    • First steps in describing the structure of public health systems

    • System diagnostics – How to improve the system

    • System access – How to work with the system

    • Very useful tool for working with organizations, communities – The ‘Ideal Network’ exercise


    Miscellany l.jpg
    Miscellany general blueprint

    • Funding for these projects was provided by NCI, CDC, the American Legacy Foundation, and the Chronic Disease Directors Association.

    • Copies of this presentation (and other associated works) are available at: http://ctpr.slu.edu

    • If you have further questions, contact me at dluke@slu.edu


    ad