Bacterial source tracking by dna fingerprinting of escherichia coli
Download
1 / 25

DNA Fingerprinting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 466 Views
  • Updated On :

Bacterial Source Tracking by DNA Fingerprinting of Escherichia coli. Bacterial Source Tracking (BST). Determination of the sources of fecal bacteria from an environmental water sample (1995) Several different techniques are currently being used for BST. BST Technology. Genotypic

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'DNA Fingerprinting' - LionelDale


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Bacterial source tracking by dna fingerprinting of escherichia coli l.jpg
Bacterial Source Tracking by DNAFingerprinting of Escherichia coli


Bacterial source tracking bst l.jpg
Bacterial Source Tracking (BST)

  • Determination of the sources of fecal bacteria from an environmental water sample (1995)

  • Several different techniques are currently being used for BST


Bst technology l.jpg
BST Technology

  • Genotypic

    • Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis (Simmons/Herbein/Hagedorn – Va. Tech.)

    • Ribotyping (Samadpour – U. of Wash.)

    • Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD)/PCR (Sadowsky – U. of Minn.)


Bst technology4 l.jpg
BST Technology

  • Biochemical (Phenotypic)

    • Multiple Antibiotic Resistance (MAR) (Hagedorn - Va. Tech/ Kator – VIMS/ Wiggins – James Madison)

    • Coliphage (Geoff Scott – NOAA)

    • Carbon Source Profiles (Hagedorn – Va. Tech)

    • Sterols or Fatty Acid Analysis

  • Chemical (Non-Bacterial)

    • Optical Brighteners

    • Caffeine Detection


Fecal indicators microbial l.jpg
Fecal Indicators (Microbial)

  • Fecal Coliforms

    • Facultative, Gram negative, non-spore forming, rod –shaped, ferment lactose producing gas within 48 hours. Sources: animals, soil (44.50 C is selective)

  • Fecal Streptococci (Enterococci)

    • Facultative, Gram positive, tolerate high salt and are used as indicators particularly in brackish or marine waters. Sources: warm-blooded animals

  • Escherichia coli

    • A sub-set of the fecal coliform. Sources: mammals and birds


Elevated levels of e coli l.jpg
Elevated levels of E. coli

  • Indicator of potential pathogens

    • Other bacteria

    • Viruses

    • O157:H7

  • Beach closings

  • Shellfish bed closings


Fecal coliform standards l.jpg
Fecal Coliform Standards

  • Recreational Water

    • < 200 MPN/100 ml

  • Shellfish Beds

    • < 14 MPN/100 ml

  • Public Drinking Water Supply

    • < 20 MPN/100 ml

  • Treated Drinking Water

    • < 1% positive/month


Sources of contamination l.jpg
Sources of Contamination

  • Treatment plants

  • Septic systems

  • Improper disposal from boats

  • Agricultural runoff

  • Pets

  • Wildlife


Project overview l.jpg
Project Overview

  • Study site selection

  • Monitor study sites for elevated levels of E. coli

  • Isolate E. coli from known sources

  • Isolate E. coli from water

  • Verify as E. coli

  • DNA analysis (Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis)

  • Match water sources to known sources

  • Possible remediation plan


Slide10 l.jpg

Determining Fate and TransportSample E. coli levels monthly for one year Use GPS and GIS to map and analyze levels Determine principal inputs of contamination


Scat collection l.jpg
Scat Collection

  • Locations within drainage area

  • Identifiable samples


Water samples l.jpg
Water Samples

  • Select rivulets or Drainage areas

  • Monitor E. coli levels by MPN

  • Monitor pH, dissolved oxygen, temp., salinity, conductivity

  • Focus on MPN “hot spots” for collecting isolates for DNA analysis


Isolation of e coli l.jpg
Isolation of E. coli

  • A-1 Broth with MUG (4-methylumbelliferyl-B-D-Glucuronide)

    • E. coli-specific enzyme glucuronidase

    • Fluorogenic metabolite

  • Presumptive E. coli :

    • Turbidity

    • Gas

    • Fluorescence


Isolation of e coli14 l.jpg
Isolation of E. coli

  • API 20-E Strips (Biochemical tests for gram negative bacteria)

  • E. coli verified


Dna sample preparation enzyme digestions l.jpg
DNA Sample Preparation: Enzyme Digestions

  • Plugs restricted with Not I

    • Restriction sites recognized:

    • DNA cut

    • Bands generated

5’..GC*GGCC GC..3’ 3’..CG CCGG*CG..5’


Gel preparation l.jpg
Gel Preparation

  • Plugs “glued” to comb

  • Gel formed around DNA plugs


Pulsed field gel electrophoresis l.jpg
Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis

  • Fragments separated by electric current

  • Multi-directional current over 20 hours

  • Downward net flow



Gel analysis l.jpg
Gel Analysis

  • Gels stained with Ethidium Bromide

  • Gels photographed under UV light

  • Banding patterns analyzed


Bacterial source identification l.jpg
Bacterial Source Identification

  • E.coli banding patterns from scat added to library

  • E. coli banding patterns from water matched to library


Dna match water sample to deer scat sample l.jpg
DNA Match: Water Sample to Deer Scat Sample

Shiles Creek water sample Shiles Creek deer scat sample


Dna match water sample to muskrat scat sample l.jpg
DNA Match: Water Sample to Muskrat Scat Sample

Shiles Creek water sample Shiles Creek muskrat scat sample


Conclusions l.jpg
Conclusions:

  • Molecular Biology advances provide a means to identify nonpoint sources of bacterial contamination.

  • Lab results identified sources consistent with rural and urban settings.

  • This technology adds to our knowledge base for better decision-making regarding potential remediation.


Students technical help l.jpg
Students/Technical Help

  • The Described Project:

    • Jon Neville, Amanda Zych, Julie Wood

  • Currently:

    • Natasha Patterson, Gayle Raynor, Rebecca Scott, Gry Wesenberg

  • Current Technical Help:

    • Lesley Frana

    • -


Acknowledgements l.jpg
Acknowledgements

  • Maryland Department of Natural Resources

    • This project was funded in part by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Section 319 Nonpoint Source Program through the Maryland Department of Natural Resources.

  • Maryland Department of the Environment

    • Technical and Regulatory Services Administration

  • R.A. Henson School of Science and Technology


ad