Child care and welfare reform child care subsidy utilization and effects on employment
Download
1 / 35

Child Care and Welfare Reform: Child Care Subsidy Utilization and Effects on Employment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 360 Views
  • Uploaded on

Child Care and Welfare Reform: Child Care Subsidy Utilization and Effects on Employment. Anne Shlay, Visiting Professor, Department of Geography and School of Public Policy, Hebrew University Professor of Sociology, Temple University http://astro.temple.edu/~ashlay. Outline.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Child Care and Welfare Reform: Child Care Subsidy Utilization and Effects on Employment' - LionelDale


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Child care and welfare reform child care subsidy utilization and effects on employment l.jpg

Child Care and Welfare Reform: Child Care Subsidy Utilization and Effects on Employment

Anne Shlay, Visiting Professor, Department of Geography and School of Public Policy, Hebrew University

Professor of Sociology, Temple University

http://astro.temple.edu/~ashlay


Outline l.jpg
Outline Utilization and Effects on Employment

  • The new welfare reform and implications for child care

  • The quality issue

  • Design and data collection

    • The Subsidy Utilization Study

    • The Employment Outcomes Study

    • The Factorial Survey Study

  • Welfare, child care and employment in Israel: discussion


Welfare reform in the u s l.jpg
Welfare Reform in the U.S. Utilization and Effects on Employment

  • 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunities Reconciliation Act (PRWORA)

  • “Change welfare as we know it.”

  • Previous welfare benefits : Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC)

  • New welfare benefits: Temporary Aid to Need Families (TANF)


Employment and welfare reform l.jpg
Employment and Welfare Reform Utilization and Effects on Employment

  • Ended welfare as an entitlement program

  • Work requirement after two years of receiving cash assistance

  • Five year total life time limit for receiving cash assistance.

  • Key element: Work requirement after two years of receiving cash assistance


Supporting work the transition off of welfare l.jpg
Supporting work: the transition off of welfare Utilization and Effects on Employment

  • PRWORA: accompanied by large federal appropriations to support transition from welfare to work

  • Overall appropriations: $30 billion

  • Support for states to operate own programs

  • Range of services include education and job training, transportation and child care


Child care and welfare reform l.jpg
Child care and welfare reform Utilization and Effects on Employment

  • Most AFDC/TANF recipients: single mothers with very young children

  • To attend education/employment programs and to work, requires child care to free up mothers’ time

  • Child care subsidies: critical component of welfare reform

  • Government pays for child care while low income women prepare for and enter the labor market


Federal support for child care subsidies l.jpg
Federal support for child care subsidies Utilization and Effects on Employment

  • Billions of dollars for child care subsidies

  • Mostly federal but some state dollars

  • Debate over whether support adequate to meet need

  • As policy issue: welfare reform given child care issue more support, public visibility and political leverage than ever before.


Child care subsidies and welfare reform two goals l.jpg
Child care subsidies and welfare reform: two goals Utilization and Effects on Employment

  • Support child care while families (mothers) in training, education or work programs to assist transition off of welfare while receiving TANF

  • Support child care for families (mothers) immediately after they stop receiving TANF to support employment and impede return to welfare

  • Key element: Child care subsidies intended to support welfare recipients make permanent transition into labor market


Important caveat germane to u s child care politics l.jpg
Important caveat: germane to U.S.: Child care politics Utilization and Effects on Employment

  • Mothers being told that they should stay home with children.

  • Guilt syndrome associated with legitimate concerns over quality of care

  • Major divisions by race and class

    • Middle class married women may have choices: to stay home or stay in the labor market. Can also afford better quality care

    • Low income women: told not to stay home. Must enter the labor market. Must use child care system, regardless of quality.


The quality issue major issue in u s l.jpg
The quality issue: major issue in U.S. Utilization and Effects on Employment

  • Child care market does not deliver quality care

  • Studies of quality (direct observation of care and proxies for quality) show most care low to mediocre quality


Why low quality l.jpg
Why low quality? Utilization and Effects on Employment

  • Poor remuneration: poverty wages

  • High turnover (33% annually)

  • Low education levels

  • Poor training

  • Informal market

  • Minimum regulations

  • Absence of regulation enforcement

  • Feminization of care work: concentration of women

  • Cost of care tied to women’s wage (lower than men’s)

  • Patriarchy/sexism


Two tiered market l.jpg
Two tiered market Utilization and Effects on Employment

  • Formal market: regulated market

  • Informal market: unregulated market


Formal market regulated market l.jpg
Formal market: regulated market Utilization and Effects on Employment

  • State regulations: regulate minimum class size, child/staff ratios, educational credentials, and minimum standards for safety and sanitation

  • Regulations do not mandate quality. Provide floor for quality

  • Includes child care centers (>12 kids), family day care homes (3-5, 6-12 kids), legally unregulated care (1-3 kids)


Informal market l.jpg
Informal market Utilization and Effects on Employment

  • Unregulated family day care homes

  • Neighbor care

  • Relative care

  • Kith and kin care


Quality and the market l.jpg
Quality and the market Utilization and Effects on Employment

  • Quality known about formal market

  • Informal market: underground

  • Approximately 50% of child care informal

  • Question: is quality lower in informal market?


Importance of quality l.jpg
Importance of quality Utilization and Effects on Employment

  • Early years important years for child development

  • Debate about brain development (first three years)

  • NICHD Study of Early Child Care

    • Quality affects development outcomes and school readiness (over and above family characteristics)

    • Impact of quality higher for lower income children than higher income children

    • Quality child care (perhaps) more important for lower income kids than higher income kids


Child care as low income family intervention l.jpg
Child care as low income family intervention Utilization and Effects on Employment

  • Child care: potentially mechanism for improving developmental outcomes for young children

  • May support school readiness and later learning ability

  • Could be mechanism for improving life chances of low income children/families

  • Reduce socio-economic difference by race, ethnicity and class


Welfare leavers study l.jpg
Welfare leavers study Utilization and Effects on Employment

  • Designed to look at child care subsidy utilization, employment outcomes and child care preferences of welfare leavers

  • Funded by two major foundations


Policy partners l.jpg
Policy partners Utilization and Effects on Employment

  • Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare: welfare and child care agency

  • Advisory board of major child care actors including practitioners and advocacy (NGO) organizations

  • Goal: do research and make into policy quickly.

  • Therefore: government and advocate partners


Initiated three empirical studies l.jpg
Initiated three empirical studies Utilization and Effects on Employment

  • Subsidy utilization study

  • Employment outcomes study

  • Child care preferences factorial survey study


Subsidy utilization study telephone survey time 1 l.jpg
Subsidy utilization Study. Telephone survey (time 1) Utilization and Effects on Employment

  • Welfare leaver utilization of child care subsidies when leaving welfare system

  • Transition process from one subsidy system to another

  • Barriers to subsidies

  • Factors that influence the acquisiton and utilization of subsidies


Employment outcomes study telephone survey time 2 l.jpg
Employment outcomes study: telephone survey (time 2) Utilization and Effects on Employment

  • Interviewed welfare leavers 6-8 months later

  • Examine acquisition and maintenance of employment

  • Impact of child care subsidies on welfare leavers’ ability to sustain employment


Factorial survey study in person interviews time 3 l.jpg
Factorial survey study: in person interviews (time 3) Utilization and Effects on Employment

  • Examine child care preferences

  • Look at whether child care subsidies permit child care use congruent with preferences


Race and ethnicity l.jpg
Race and ethnicity Utilization and Effects on Employment

  • Compared differences by race and ethnicity

  • Specifically looked at differences among White, Hispanic and African American welfare leavers

  • Race and ethnicity: structural factors in U.S. society

  • Distributes rewards, outcomes and opportunities

  • Dimensions of inequality both within and between classes


Race and ethnicity as cultural factors l.jpg
Race and ethnicity as cultural factors Utilization and Effects on Employment

  • Believed to be related to child care use and subsidy use

  • Related to attitudes, preferences and behaviors vis a vis child care and child care subsidies

  • Look at differences among race and ethnicity


Overall study design l.jpg
Overall study design Utilization and Effects on Employment

  • Comparative and longitudinal

  • Sample of White, African American and Hispanic welfare leavers

  • Sampled from lists of welfare leavers provided by Department of Public Welfare

  • Stratified random sample: random sample from three strata defined by race and ethnicity


Final sample l.jpg
Final sample Utilization and Effects on Employment

  • 658 welfare recipients

    • African Americans: 228

    • White: 215

    • Hispanic: 215

  • Time 1: Overall response rate: 66% (similar across all groups)

  • Time 2: 36% of study respondents from time 1.


Subsidy utilization study preliminary findings on subsidy and child care use l.jpg
Subsidy utilization study: Preliminary findings on subsidy and child care use

  • Less than one third used a child care subsidy after leaving welfare

  • Large number (30%) used unsubsidized care

  • Largest group (40%) used no form of regular child care

  • African Americans used child care subsidies at twice the rate of White or Hispanic welfare leavers


Employment outcomes study preliminary findings l.jpg
Employment outcomes study: preliminary findings and child care use

  • Continuity in use of subsidized care over time (61% received subsidies at time 1 and time 2)

  • Continuity in employment (94% employed at time one were employed at time 2)

  • Having child care subsidies increased probably of employment by 139%


Factorial survey design l.jpg
Factorial survey: Design and child care use

  • Method to examine preferences for complex, multidimensional phenomenon

  • Factor out different components of multidimensional phenomenon

  • Goal: look at the impact of different components on overall preferences for multi-dimensional phenomena

  • Examples: housing and neighborhood preferences, household prestige, crime seriousness, sexual harassment, racial prejudice.


Random assignment to short stories vignettes l.jpg
Random assignment to short stories: vignettes and child care use

  • Determine discrete items that make up multidimensional phenomena: dimensions (type of variable)

  • Determine levels within dimensions (values of variables)

  • Have computer randomly assign levels to short stories (vignettes)

  • Ask overall rating question: desirability

  • Use multivariate technique to assess independent contribution of each level on net changes in desirability.


Examples of dimensions and levels l.jpg

Type of care and child care use

a. center care

b. family day care

c. relative cared. neighbor care

Location of care

a. in your home

b. not in your home

Relationship to care provider

a. care by a relative

b. care by a neighbor

c. care by a friend

d. care by a professional

Familiarity with care provider

a. someone you have known for a long time

b. someone you have not known for a long time

License

a. is licensed  

b. is unlicensed

c. [blank] 

Group size 

a. provides care for children in smaller groups 

b. provides care for children in larger groups  

Examples of dimensions and levels


Slide33 l.jpg

Sample Child Care Vignette and child care use

This is a relative care arrangement in the relative's home that is a 15-minute commute from home to child care and 30-minute commute from child care to work. The arrangement is accredited. It accepts subsidized children and offers care during the evenings and weekends.

The care provider has some training in child care. The care provider does not have any experience taking care of children in a child care setting.

The care provider is not warm but strict. The children receive a lot of individual attention.

The program has planned activities for learning and playing.

The care provider always makes sure that everything appears to be clean and safe for the children. The children cared for are racially mixed and are mostly children from high income families. Most of the children are receiving a subsidy to help pay for the cost of care.

______________________________________________________________________

Please circle the number that best corresponds with your answer.1. How much would you like this child care for you and your family?

Not at all Very much

1------------2-----------3-----------4-----------5-----------6-----------7-----------8-----------9

2. In your view, what would be a fair weekly price for this child care? Please disregard whether or not you could afford the fair price.

$0 <$20 $21-$40 $41-$60 $61-$80 $81-$100 $101-$120 $121-$140 $141-$160 $161-$180 >$181

1------2------------3------------4------------5------------6---------------7----------------8----------------9--------------10----------11

3. How much would you be willing to pay per week for this child care?

$0 <$20 $21-$40 $41-$60 $61-$80 $81-$100 $101-$120 $121-$140 $141-$160 $161-$180 >$181

1---------2------------3------------4------------5------------6---------------7----------------8----------------9--------------10-------11


Factorial survey analysis l.jpg
Factorial Survey Analysis and child care use

  • Assess contribution of impact of having a license not have a license, center care versus family care.

  • Also assesses overall contribution of dimensions, e.g. effect of regulations, child care provider interactions

  • Applications to multiple set of issues


Child care and welfare reform35 l.jpg
Child care and welfare reform and child care use

  • The Israeli context??


ad