Loading in 5 sec....

Computational Modeling of Magnetic InterventionPowerPoint Presentation

Computational Modeling of Magnetic Intervention

- 204 Views
- Updated On :
- Presentation posted in: Pets / Animals

Computational Modeling of Magnetic Intervention. D. V. Rose* Voss Scientific, LLC A. E. Robson, J. D. Sethian, and J. L. Giuliani Naval Research Laboratory High Average Power Laser Program Workshop Naval Research Laboratory, Building 226 Auditorium October 30 and 31, 2007.

Computational Modeling of Magnetic Intervention

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Computational Modeling of Magnetic Intervention

D. V. Rose*Voss Scientific, LLC

A. E. Robson, J. D. Sethian, and J. L. Giuliani

Naval Research Laboratory

High Average Power Laser Program Workshop

Naval Research Laboratory, Building 226 Auditorium

October 30 and 31, 2007

*With a special acknowledgement to Chris Mostrom for continuing work on 3D graphics!

- Electromagnetic analysis of the Pechacek experiment is essentially complete.
- We are continuing to use this analysis to explore other computational models suitable for efficient EM analysis of IFE-scale MI physics.

- Ion orbit analysis of the conventional MI concept has indicated that the escaping ion “beams” in both the ring and point cusps result in very high current densities.
- No integrated, feasible solution of this ion-stopping/materials problem is known at this time.

- Ion orbit analysis of the OCTACUSP MI concept (A. Robson) is underway (and is the main subject of this presentation):
- Discussed in the previous presentation by A. Robson.

- The essential physical character of the experiment reproduced in a 2D, large-scale simulation.
- This model is NOT directly extendable to IFE chamber-scale problems.

- We are continuing to develop new models that should lessen the discrepancies and handle the IFE chamber spatial & temporal scales.
- The Pechacek experiment will continue to be the test case for all new algorithms.

t (ms)

t (ms)

Ion channel “width” as a function of time at r=29 cm in the escape cusp.

Ion channel transverse momentum (vz) at r=29 cm.

- The duckbill ion dump design does NOT look feasible for the ring cusp.
- “5th” coil designs to spread the escaping ion ring have not been successful.

HeliumDensity at25 ms

The resulting time-integratedenergy deposition is a littlebroader than the 4-coil case.

Triangles:

Circles:

Conformal Triangles:

|B| contour levels at z=0 plane illustrating magnetic void at center of trap (left). 3D representation of a single |B| iso-surface also shown (right).

|B|~0.1T iso-surfaces

The long tube-like extensions away from the center of the chamber at X-type neutral lines.

Magnetic field at x=200 cm plane:

Chamber wall, r=5 m

Sample streamlines withoutconductor boundaries:

Sample streamlines withconductor boundaries:

“outside” view

View from “inside” the chamber:

- 5-meter radius vacuum chamber
- Four triangular main “coils” mapped onto a 6-meter radius sphere
- each triangle carrys 6 MA
- Allows 1-meter for neutral shielding

- Eight 1.1-meter radius solenoids along ion drift tubes
- Drift tubes have an inner diameter of 0.9 meters
- Solenoids composed of 11 individual rings, each carrying 100 kA

- Only 3.0 MeV Helium ions (4He++) followed here.

Oct17.lsp

Particle positions and

densities at 5 ms:

Here, only surface cells with non-zerocharge deposition are plotted.

All surface cells plotted

For this case, about

40% of the ions reach theends of the drift tubes.

About 2% are deposited at the neutral line points,and 58% are in the flowerpetals radiating out from the entrance to the drift tubes.

Lsp uses combinatorialgeometry of basic objectsto build physical spaces and material boundaries.

Target planes alongone drift tube are shown.

At r = 10 m:

* Additional diagnostics, not shown here, also indicate an expanding ion beam envelope.

- Tapered X-type neutral line physics (including diamagnetic effects) needs to be addressed.
- Full “Perkins” ion spectrum needs to be examined once the current design exercise is completed.
- Lead vapor dE/dx mass-stopping analysis for the ions (realistic energy loading, radiation, thermal cycles, etc.).
- The eight-fold symmetry of the OCTACUSP design adds complexity to the plasma/magnetic-field interaction analysis. (A full 3D inertialess-electron dynamic EM model is still being explored.)

- Issues with the “conventional” MI chamber (with 2 or 4 coil system with ring and point cusps) are forcing consideration of other magnetic field topologies.
- Bertie’s OCTACUSP design:
- preserves the spherical symmetry inherent in direct-drive systems
- minimizes the chamber surface area for ion escape ports (~5%)

- Other coil configurations are possible (nested triangles, etc.)

1-m radius solenoids at each point cusp, 2 kA/cm (11 rings each carrying x MA)

5-meter radius chamber

Conformal Triangles on 6-m radius sphere, 3 MA

3 MeV He++ ion orbits followed

Show magnetic field topology

Ion orbits

Sample density plot

Energy deposition on surfaces.

|B|=0.6 T iso-surfaces.

Neutral lines (6)lie along thecoordinate axesin this orientation,and terminatenear the chamberwall.

Ion Energy Delivery:

~20% in 8 tube ends

~4% in 6 neutral line points

~76% in the chamber wall (flower petals)

R = 6 m

R = 10 m

* Additional diagnostics, not shown here, also indicate an oscillating ion beam envelope.

Sample orbits for 3 MeVa particles launchedfrom the origin at differentinitial angles.

Escape radius is 200 cm(the radius of the conductingspherical boundary).